1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
|
Return-Path: <tomh@thinlink.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28E689D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 1 Aug 2015 23:57:26 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pd0-f180.google.com (mail-pd0-f180.google.com
[209.85.192.180])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA7B7EA
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 1 Aug 2015 23:57:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pdrg1 with SMTP id g1so58734689pdr.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 01 Aug 2015 16:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=6hFlqXfJxmWnNVpiVr8PtzI7rFf/IHvUGQpVt6m85o4=;
b=SWYeIb04NmkCLlLQz+XeEORo2xRRPx5KjSlsP4Lr9KdE7HW1ONO/fxM4ot9vX3L5g1
+UsWa+xihHeeYi1UpeeV8iOPzkuvkNlAVa3Mz1Vp7jTd0xyZ8RZL9ICGM89fXJYu84dt
dOrETxmwuNPXSQ874oQWaFYvImmgftHw6Zwovn84uC5MMiGWan/64YtXdGWSkOZn/2v3
i6qtFaDw+wVTeK+oKoDz5NDjyCLzMfYm25MyjY9fNJtMBYQg0vDNdXyYUpSR/bweRy8q
RTjoY7I11MeUlgEioVChSRqRnLmFD0sfRYTMzbhnr8mbh7T7L3KZoFW247M6N22zDEgi
qzug==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmK+UgP6sI+NR/bUc8Nc1i+535Uqm+6ytOBTjtNa0XwrdvGmO5RYcUiwcjorhL4VZSD2biS
X-Received: by 10.70.103.145 with SMTP id fw17mr22236947pdb.1.1438473445426;
Sat, 01 Aug 2015 16:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.89] (99-8-65-117.lightspeed.davlca.sbcglobal.net.
[99.8.65.117]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
hk4sm3205743pbb.80.2015.08.01.16.57.23
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Sat, 01 Aug 2015 16:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <20150731083943.Horde.68uT9J78H_PdIgIwQP5frA1@server47.web-hosting.com>
<CAPg+sBhFYJudy+m8+FqxTczj6W8Uc1pH1BsOqP0kgxmv-FMW0w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <55BD5CE4.80703@thinlink.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2015 16:57:24 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPg+sBhFYJudy+m8+FqxTczj6W8Uc1pH1BsOqP0kgxmv-FMW0w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] A compromise between BIP101 and Pieter's proposal
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2015 23:57:26 -0000
On 8/1/2015 1:45 PM, Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>
> Regarding "reasonable", I have a theory. What if we would have had 8
> MB blocks from the start? My guess is that some more people would have
> decided to run their high-transaction-rate use cases on chain, that
> we'd regularly see 4-6 MB blocks,
You've proposed scaling the cap based on technology growth. There's
still a cap to stop bad things from happening.
Once that is done, why worry so much about whether the uses are
efficient? Let people work in the space created. Let them figure out
how to make good things happen in the application space.
|
