summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/8b/a8ebd1af97a7c344a7cd51fb353ae18df73f85
blob: 9a1d867b4ebc33f3de62357fdca4dbad55e8aca1 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 325CD3EE
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:09:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail149055.authsmtp.co.uk (outmail149055.authsmtp.co.uk
	[62.13.149.55])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 857411B8
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:09:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235])
	by punt17.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t7HF9sfs087314;
	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:09:54 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [25.83.82.194] ([24.114.38.12]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t7HF9m5Q010643
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:09:51 +0100 (BST)
In-Reply-To: <55D1F471.8060802@bitminter.com>
References: <CABsx9T16fH+56isq95m4+QWsKwP==tf75ep8ghnEcBoV4OtZJA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1679272.aDpruqxXDP@coldstorage>
	<CABm2gDr98G1K1F7YapCQbKtQ2YEsW8FrYVnFtk+M2Hfvy4WgfQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1963286.x5NhlJ5RfS@pluto>
	<CABm2gDqhoDrQAVAE4oedHEK2s_iYwPAADVZVj2zb940eG2hGBQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<55D1F471.8060802@bitminter.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:01:30 +0000
To: BitMinter operator <operator@bitminter.com>,
	BitMinter operator via bitcoin-dev
	<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>, 
	bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Message-ID: <1141FB24-698B-4A6B-8028-646BCD0B43A0@petertodd.org>
X-Server-Quench: 03f2f2b7-44f2-11e5-b398-002590a15da7
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
	http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
	aQdMdwUUGUATAgsB AmMbWlJeUFR7XGc7 aQ5PbARZfElGQQRo
	T0xPR01TWkFveWoI Wxt/UhhycQFFNntz Z0QsXnMNXhJ4J0Fg
	RkoCF3AHZDJldTIc WUhFdwNWdQpKLx5A PgF4GhFYa3VsNCMk
	FAgyOXU9MCtqYApY TxpFJFQeCVoLE3Y2 QxcJHnAhHEsJRiM8 ZwQ8LVURB115
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 24.114.38.12/465
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
	anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fees and the block-finding process
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:09:57 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256



On 17 August 2015 07:49:21 GMT-07:00, BitMinter operator via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>I don't think mining pools will immediately make blocks as big as
>possible if the hard limit is raised.

Note that XT includes a patch that sets the soft limit to be the same as the hard limit by default, so if miners did use the defaults "as big as possible" blocks would be produced.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQE9BAEBCAAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJV0fc+
AAoJEMCF8hzn9Lnc47AIAIubfigcCrw3GiPUxsqzNkY2BECj+ACcoNCJaftjtM1b
y5GrR0Ud8F9NKVw2iaG67ofgq7ry/s9MpgxhRFTjYrEyF+CCmUuuV4fu9f4zXzLc
uHXh781zwa9wZKXls53vlS1v1V3jips5B8k+SWh2IWlaOBqZ0onb2uhojE8xfaqU
vIAJIu8bSX1BHX3VnHN6u4VvUJx1EUj4zNpLj1C4fVsbCO+mzvKucNc6KGRXRSWe
fde6h7gHJE7A7+K5E/xdXAlpIt1PAO8upE7tPwBiqwLWMEg82leVtMP7ivZ5XZlu
Uqh5GKIfCCs11jO189TijwDDUYwlAOXENBtowX+3YbQ=
=Emr/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----