1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
|
Return-Path: <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 231F4932
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 19 Dec 2016 02:22:32 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail.bluematt.me (mail.bluematt.me [192.241.179.72])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9668119E
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 19 Dec 2016 02:22:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:2607:fb90:a444:c025:8c9e:4ff5:473b:ddd0] (unknown
[172.58.32.214])
by mail.bluematt.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D0C3D132D84;
Mon, 19 Dec 2016 02:22:27 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <d2e0dd76-e6ec-8ccb-5a33-48f0d005afe9@librelamp.com>
References: <f27bd300c20d1b48cddc7e1d1dc1a96c@112bit.com>
<615c88d2a1263810923705c170b25d33@112bit.com>
<d2e0dd76-e6ec-8ccb-5a33-48f0d005afe9@librelamp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=UTF-8
From: Matt Corallo <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 02:22:21 +0000
To: Alice Wonder <alice@librelamp.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Alice Wonder via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <9E1EA42E-B37E-47C9-89B0-37F4CDB2B711@mattcorallo.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Planned Obsolescence
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 02:22:32 -0000
Please do report bugs to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin . If you never report them of course they won't get fixed. I'm not aware of test suite failures and know a bunch of folks who use CentOS, though not sure how many develop on it.
On December 18, 2016 12:07:36 PM PST, Alice Wonder via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>On 12/14/2016 07:38 PM, Juan Garavaglia via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>
>>
>> For reasons I am unable to determine a significant number of node
>> operators do not upgrade their clients.
>
>I almost did not update to 0.13.0 because the test suite was failing
>due
>to python errors. How to fix them was posted on bitcointalk.
>
>0.13.1 came with new python errors in the test suite. So I just said
>fuck it.
>
>When the test suite actually works in my fairly standard environment
>(CentOS) in the distributed release, I will upgrade.
>
>Until then, I'm not jumping through hoops to make the test suite work
>and I'm not running clients that haven't passed the test suite so
>that's
>why I almost didn't update to 0.13.0 and haven't updated since.
>_______________________________________________
>bitcoin-dev mailing list
>bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
|
