summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/8b/710b391e18f8249701a784f68fd0f3a3f0932a
blob: f39d9bde891dc249ab61dbb695fd24999536326e (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
Return-Path: <rebroad@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC951C0001
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:04:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D104ED55
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:04:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.201
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
 dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id FbJvD75yBVcY
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:04:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-ot1-x32d.google.com (mail-ot1-x32d.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32d])
 by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 714764ED4E
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:04:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id t16so3492651ott.3
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri, 12 Mar 2021 05:04:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=RlrEeweqtfDJpppqizbnnATIzmiEfJI1Djtjn0UF23Q=;
 b=Vqfjnx3lKsz+zeDDTEWDTDpWvhFnyO4d1b/ah9Jd/xnJYwU1JMIF4l+jID/LJn1ZUb
 4FIMLt31KZ8ThEr9IOM/4a++LGLCputWJ4QKj/xWAQn8kEdQKK4+KnN0Q/KUYP/ewuMl
 sqCTnJNoDhhkHViFLs/f3jmlG3q6eyvLUoq9kQZtyxHTy75lPHxWfEDdblp5x0x+sRqQ
 zt9VlIuI0+T7Ik0pkxfCAA4HPvgNafSJkPFd1jQSDvimltclpsMACO/ERH2jxY5CPTCL
 N+nsEgJt1joFBwQt4rFVsibOYxHdxtWtNHR1JVaZoKkcWefzFUo2VPuqJUGHMX3evN9x
 2AbQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=RlrEeweqtfDJpppqizbnnATIzmiEfJI1Djtjn0UF23Q=;
 b=LQkwF4JzRo2WIA0yJNtcSINhnmnNQnmgCGKMS/Ivp9wG7pKVoPJoRvXzhjRUvP9NPN
 saWGyEamwpdtepgtcXzpnhOj02/aiciSl4/Hwj/GqKTjJJcpNvxPf48X9Bo+we9N7mEt
 gjWauJBEaP8I9Gzx16UGiNInGrOrLTIht9FuZp//mlDs9kISflVaT/emcDkHgB3lOkiT
 /O3n+mL1H1bc1Iu/FRY7EeBCRsMRSmv6h7VnQ8xCU9Uar1/ETdOSxU1NCajhoaLtMIlL
 NNJeh0ZBkG59uIFHu6PAx3SZ59Gc1AUXcKG6jsA6oun9sP0ME0NeHoKTphzy9p+fSGxF
 SgFw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5318va40Fok5/dAD0zG6AYYZvDlIJEpW9i0cKFfLvYnk4v1lbsKV
 YGsdpBVRhYrsM3zqXXtXFonvddsBPWp8B7nhnIs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyu8eHEynXuQk4J3AHCkzw/fdGlXQPGAT8ERtap9rhEBN73yRWRJApcAh03v1pV2OtxSAoaqvHv1A3sM00pMKQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6196:: with SMTP id g22mr3307853otk.74.1615554258421; 
 Fri, 12 Mar 2021 05:04:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <SL2P216MB0089B70AEDD58F2EBC46B4309D9A9@SL2P216MB0089.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
 <A326C6D2-7C6E-42A2-93C9-DC7647BB09B6@voskuil.org>
 <fbc4ce6c-111d-4dcc-8fc7-03ea91855bc4@www.fastmail.com>
 <SL2P216MB00899B7B3C67C0DD9E9376B09D989@SL2P216MB0089.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
 <CAJowKg+UY4AN_9otk+6doNsP6NVeHZti_89rCAOTfVaQahre+A@mail.gmail.com>
 <SL2P216MB00893A9FE7A43CDC373197889D979@SL2P216MB0089.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
 <CAMnpzfpJSy6Jib_467c7zhE02cSNhjG7T8ASJ=X-b_j4F1Zmgg@mail.gmail.com>
 <SL2P216MB0089B36FF0EFAB9958E4DA5B9D919@SL2P216MB0089.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
 <CALeFGL2oNzuUx=aYbqtEknhJ1wviof2neB7eFwBBJ_4iA0wOMw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALeFGL2oNzuUx=aYbqtEknhJ1wviof2neB7eFwBBJ_4iA0wOMw@mail.gmail.com>
From: R E Broadley <rebroad+linuxfoundation.org@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:04:05 +0000
Message-ID: <CAFBxzAAO1u=C8wpwvRs5evE657V0NdnSE9PYAbanpJt5ZdSkdA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Keagan McClelland <keagan.mcclelland@gmail.com>, 
 Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 22:02:31 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot NACK
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:04:21 -0000

Can I just point out (to those addressing James as Lord/Excelency/etc
that he isn't noble nor a Lord, so just wanted to mention this in case
people were giving him more attention than the average person would be
afforded.

My 2p (an equal 2p) on Taproot is ACK, by the way.

On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 00:49, Keagan McClelland via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> LORD HIS EXCELLENCY,
>
> This isn't different with Taproot either. When you spend a P2SH output yo=
u reveal the script. In Taproot you reveal the portion of the script that i=
s relevant to allowing you to spend it. There is no value to specifying the=
 other possible conditions that could have moved the coins because, after a=
ll, you aren't invoking those clauses to move the coins. I am showing you m=
y fingertip, and pointing to my finger tip, the palm is not relevant.
>
> Keagan
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 2:11 AM LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via bitcoi=
n-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> Good Afternoon,
>>
>> You cannot liken the ability to scrutinise the public ledger to be the s=
ame as hiding information, it is like showing your palm while you are point=
ing at the back of your hand. The advice that I have is P2SH is scrutable o=
nce the UTXO is spent. Also, there is no public ledger obfuscation in creat=
ing new addresses, there is a plausible reduction in transaction linkage.
>>
>> KING JAMES HRMH
>> Great British Empire
>>
>> Regards,
>> The Australian
>> LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH (& HMRH)
>> of Hougun Manor & Glencoe & British Empire
>> MR. Damian A. James Williamson
>> Wills
>>
>> et al.
>>
>>
>> Willtech
>> www.willtech.com.au
>> www.go-overt.com
>> and other projects
>>
>> earn.com/willtech
>> linkedin.com/in/damianwilliamson
>>
>>
>> m. 0487135719
>> f. +61261470192
>>
>>
>> This email does not constitute a general advice. Please disregard this e=
mail if misdelivered.
>> ________________________________
>> From: bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org> on beh=
alf of Ryan Grant via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, 6 March 2021 1:04 AM
>> To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
>> Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot NACK
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 8:48 PM LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via
>> bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > My concern was that the more complex scripts allow obfuscation of the =
Pay To address
>>
>> This is no different from options available in P2SH, or from the
>> obfuscation achieved by generating a new address for a payment.
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev