1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <bk@thinkloop.com>) id 1VqXny-00060i-VU
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 00:37:34 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of thinkloop.com
designates 209.85.212.177 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.212.177; envelope-from=bk@thinkloop.com;
helo=mail-wi0-f177.google.com;
Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1VqXnx-0004Uc-LR
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 00:37:34 +0000
Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id cc10so125919wib.16
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:37:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
bh=/PLeFMlKZ9z7nTPZuyzn+hakBka/Fvj7hqfY4WPdnL4=;
b=kFpkzomQ34ZICNcByWSnALmyWFSQ1ErQ1GYYV4oRm+MA9zP4w4qQyAxaNHRyw42H5e
6w58faQnrkNQVLiHk5pJ/+y2YWU4kJJDqFaTBO5xVz++r6uSTPWPyIa22fJ4X7MVFeYA
+ADWTyfvWQdvMSBceEJZujbUuDqjpnUJDk9WQoht766bmQJN53o+Tb+Kk6nkyDNbtCCG
7GfCNc/JRfZr5OlFQX1UgFCtiKWbC84o4kQ+IGY4t+wJ7DDpvXUYBmVamFtjmVt6Cw2T
LiItbAkqRjm7Vmh+aAf5aZB2N9TAXfUQfWWUDSopmrz7+/LHxiOi+D7AfofU07RcDj+I
ppgw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnA4rDK7hCMQzInhNf6osix7efG2mQUcviUQxOOg2CyaThLks6EyEi+SCJO9/YzD3I6q8ek
X-Received: by 10.194.60.103 with SMTP id g7mr76024798wjr.37.1386720459085;
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:07:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.18.234 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:07:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [67.170.49.167]
In-Reply-To: <CAC1+kJNbSn_3p9Pu_geyb0nYhE10mLkpJ1o-4BzR-w2p5e_5pQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAO7N=i1p=7fGgzJXvctRoGTsztP6f9rqs78s9=Vnc3TC0RVLdA@mail.gmail.com>
<20131209221130.GA22556@shavo.dd-wrt>
<CAO7N=i0Y=sKXa=djc+8652e_0NiWLyMA9hrXyddaS+gOTu0yxQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJHLa0MXzQoSso+ZdXsNf7nzBe=6tCsq0CNrbF6waFxV2moWiQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAO7N=i3wb0cmoaTsQSrMhezgsGqCxzK-AzAF22LU0UpBLcqiUw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAC1+kJNbSn_3p9Pu_geyb0nYhE10mLkpJ1o-4BzR-w2p5e_5pQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Baz <bk@thinkloop.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:07:19 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAsce+vzR_TGX5x9GaGGZLNh4ML4LO_mZPH0O1inhi0ag7sXVw@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Tim=F3n?= <jtimon@monetize.io>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b86cfbc5df03604ed370489
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information. [URIs: freico.in]
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.0 LOTS_OF_MONEY Huge... sums of money
X-Headers-End: 1VqXnx-0004Uc-LR
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net,
Ryan Carboni <ryan.jc.pc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Monetary Authority for Bitcoin
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 00:37:35 -0000
--047d7b86cfbc5df03604ed370489
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bitcoin's volatility is not a symptom of its architecture, but a reflection
of the collective knowledge of its future acceptance. Currently that
knowledge is based on very volatile sources: how some senator feels about
it this morning, which direction departments in the Chinese government are
leaning. The issue is that proof-of-work is missing from society's end. As
time goes on, laws, regulations and policies will start to form, people
will challenge them, they will be reviewed and updated, they will be
challenged again on different grounds, re-reviewed, and so on. Each of
those confirmations will make it that much harder to change earlier
confirmations. It won't matter anymore what some senator thinks this
morning because she will have months of hard-work ahead of her before she
can affect any change. It also doesn't matter if the rulings are positive
or negative, just having them will add stability to Bitcoin at some value
between $0.0001 to $100,000 per coin.
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Jorge Tim=F3n <jtimon@monetize.io> wrote:
> On 12/10/13, Ryan Carboni <ryan.jc.pc@gmail.com> wrote:
> > You're just closed minded.
>
> No, at least to persons have explained you why your proposal is not
> feasible.
> If you wanted to learn, you would have made questions on why those
> parts of your proposal are unfeasible.
> There have been many proposals about "stablecoins" in bitcointalk and
> other forums (for example, the "initial proposals" freicoin subforum).
> I have participated in several of them trying to find a solution and
> I'm now convinced that this is impossible to implement in a secure AND
> P2P system.
>
> This is off-topic for this forum, specially if (as you've shown to us)
> you are not interested in learning why this proposal is unfeasible.
>
> --
> Jorge Tim=F3n
>
> http://freico.in/
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
> Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
> Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
> Download it for free now!
>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=3D111408631&iu=3D/4140/ostg=
.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
--047d7b86cfbc5df03604ed370489
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">Bitcoin's volatility is not a symptom of its architect=
ure, but a reflection of the collective knowledge of its future acceptance.=
Currently that knowledge is based on very volatile sources: how some senat=
or feels about it this morning, which direction departments in the Chinese =
government are leaning. The issue is that proof-of-work is missing from soc=
iety's end. As time goes on, laws, regulations and policies will start =
to form, people will challenge them, they will be reviewed and updated, the=
y will be challenged again on different grounds, re-reviewed, and so on. Ea=
ch of those confirmations will make it that much harder to change earlier c=
onfirmations. It won't matter anymore what some senator thinks this mor=
ning because she will have months of hard-work ahead of her before she can =
affect any change. It also doesn't matter if the rulings are positive o=
r negative, just having them will add stability to Bitcoin at some value be=
tween $0.0001 to $100,000 per coin.<div>
<br></div><div><br></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div clas=
s=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Jorge Tim=F3n <span dir=
=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:jtimon@monetize.io" target=3D"_blank">jtimon=
@monetize.io</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 12/10/13, Ryan Carboni <<a href=3D"mai=
lto:ryan.jc.pc@gmail.com">ryan.jc.pc@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> You're just closed minded.<br>
<br>
No, at least to persons have explained you why your proposal is not feasibl=
e.<br>
If you wanted to learn, you would have made questions on why those<br>
parts of your proposal are unfeasible.<br>
There have been many proposals about "stablecoins" in bitcointalk=
and<br>
other forums (for example, the "initial proposals" freicoin subfo=
rum).<br>
I have participated in several of them trying to find a solution and<br>
I'm now convinced that this is impossible to implement in a secure AND<=
br>
P2P system.<br>
<br>
This is off-topic for this forum, specially if (as you've shown to us)<=
br>
you are not interested in learning why this proposal is unfeasible.<br>
<span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"><br>
--<br>
Jorge Tim=F3n<br>
<br>
<a href=3D"http://freico.in/" target=3D"_blank">http://freico.in/</a><br>
</font></span><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---<br>
Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK<br>
Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.<br>
Download it for free now!<br>
<a href=3D"http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=3D111408631&iu=
=3D/4140/ostg.clktrk" target=3D"_blank">http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gam=
pad/clk?id=3D111408631&iu=3D/4140/ostg.clktrk</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-develo=
pment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
--047d7b86cfbc5df03604ed370489--
|
