1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <jtimon@monetize.io>) id 1WWOly-0004iG-Ik
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 05 Apr 2014 11:28:30 +0000
Received: from mail-la0-f47.google.com ([209.85.215.47])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1WWOlw-0002qn-Od
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 05 Apr 2014 11:28:30 +0000
Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id pn19so3227726lab.6
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Sat, 05 Apr 2014 04:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=OCoTefCWQFHdrgHfjdvmDH5od0ZmXpeX8kGEk3DNbVo=;
b=PbeZBwL0Ryl5vTNqgql6s6uSg15PXQn3eEvestJOTbI7k1iiYtlBPlaQ8eFCBXpDX8
s1FGt99YQoZZlw5sP3iqIepa1nl3VW94dpYqdytnVlupeeqTgCqUZ5LUPMF9trEC5E/F
PDB/ZGwoIMkRL3aCGFIyDhHk/8vakwrC9trvkfJn9FYYbQq08gx0zAPw2L5jVwuMqo2t
Ntlq/RHKlczgpVcyp+Vpww0wKdUHhOmJ4IiE8h2ePX8HyBF4x0JVAapbD+qjpLmDWQoZ
cBK0TAbTi4IL13T5xhRjvdkB1n1TV7Q3uwk6lQbZA8x+G5N6MRgILQ6VNQgnXlvoZbsH
r/AA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlln/poKSFKTVB2hLjctYu2rXwAfvMAT9gKjK89MrkJLuAFLa2dln8TJ8dVsKcaohXkyINa
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.29.170 with SMTP id l10mr717938lah.40.1396697301587;
Sat, 05 Apr 2014 04:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.60.196 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 04:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [85.53.145.179]
In-Reply-To: <1750679.2ZqEPETxMv@crushinator>
References: <CAPg+sBh1_mYH4JNv1xTFnLsoC=qzmgi0QaLAyd7YeQ=wZQBDSQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJHLa0P9SmynBfJ94A1js30j2OsC0PeEhEy-n+6Wa2Sogo+TNw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAC1+kJPUxNn0iSz=c3OTCFS26sg2jxS-goUdE7LSKphtE9owKw@mail.gmail.com>
<1750679.2ZqEPETxMv@crushinator>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 13:28:21 +0200
Message-ID: <CAC1+kJP+S8busSkQrxuW-3bU8zkJEXXPZ1G=cRGADj8CKgYSjA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Tim=F3n?= <jtimon@monetize.io>
To: Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock.name>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?209.85.215.47>]
X-Headers-End: 1WWOlw-0002qn-Od
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Finite monetary supply for Bitcoin
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 11:28:30 -0000
On 4/5/14, Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock.name> wrote:
> On Saturday, 5 April 2014, at 12:21 pm, Jorge Tim=F3n wrote:
>> I like both DD-MM-YYYY and YYYY-MM-DD. I just dislike MM-DD-YYYY and
>> YYYY-DD-MM.
>
> Your preferences reflect a cultural bias. The only entirely numeric date
> format that is unambiguous across all cultures is YYYY-MM-DD. (No culture
> uses YYYY-DD-MM, or at least the ISO seems to think so.)
Probably my acceptance of DD-MM-YYYY is caused by cultural bias.
The ISO YYYY-MM-DD seems what you normally do with indo-arabic
numerals: put the more weighted numbers on the left, so I guess it's
the most universal (in addition to being standard).
--=20
Jorge Tim=F3n
http://freico.in/
|
