path: root/89/4cad4082a2efe308c369966c213b2ba2455bf1

Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <jan.moller@gmail.com>) id 1WceAP-0004L8-56
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:07:33 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.192.45 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.192.45; envelope-from=jan.moller@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-qg0-f45.google.com; 
Received: from mail-qg0-f45.google.com ([209.85.192.45])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1WceAL-0006BP-O9
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:07:33 +0000
Received: by mail-qg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id a108so5677880qge.18
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.114.130 with SMTP id e2mr49411722qaq.53.1398186444182;
	Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.24.208 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <11528A13-5D66-4D2B-BEE0-1C26F9987BC8@bitsofproof.com>
References: <CAC7yFxSE8-TWPN-kuFiqdPKMDuprbiVJi7-z-ym+AUyA_f-xJw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABh=4qNaJht-MnnjEguZ=UOuXN3uQ-s4-dkDUVErbHj6W44J_g@mail.gmail.com>
	<1927948.OEZHQcsQ9n@crushinator> <2025496.b5Y3n7qx8B@crushinator>
	<1582E990-4E14-4EF7-9C9C-AA505B815104@bitsofproof.com>
	<53568B87.8040009@monetize.io>
	<11528A13-5D66-4D2B-BEE0-1C26F9987BC8@bitsofproof.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:07:24 +0200
Message-ID: <CABh=4qPsR1YbhJDeAPjr37Zjqawo9ZFAH43scFnEg7p9a7EkeQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jan_M=C3=B8ller?= <jan.moller@gmail.com>
To: Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bea44cc55ff4c04f7a4a6a4
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(jan.moller[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
	no trust [209.85.192.45 listed in list.dnswl.org]
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1WceAL-0006BP-O9
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Presenting a BIP for Shamir's Secret
 Sharing of Bitcoin private keys
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jan.moller@gmail.com
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:07:33 -0000

--047d7bea44cc55ff4c04f7a4a6a4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Treating testnet differently is quite the norm, we have that in BIP 32, 38,
70, SIPA private keys (no BIP for that I guess), bitcoin addresses etc. At
the same time none of them define values for alt coins as far as I recall.


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof.com>wrote:

> I use several test chains while testing my software, the official test
> net, a standalone net in house and even chains only created on the fly for
> unit tests. I found no use of distinguishing serialization of keys while
> using any of them.
>
> If you have some deep insights about why this is needed share it, as I am
> not goint to guess your valuable thoughts.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tamas Blummer
> http://bitsofproof.com
>
> On 22.04.2014, at 17:32, Mark Friedenbach <mark@monetize.io> wrote:
>
> Testnet vs mainnet is quite a separate issue than bitcoin vs altcoin.
> Unfortunately few of the alts ever figured this out.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Start Your Social Network Today - Download eXo Platform
> Build your Enterprise Intranet with eXo Platform Software
> Java Based Open Source Intranet - Social, Extensible, Cloud Ready
> Get Started Now And Turn Your Intranet Into A Collaboration Platform
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/ExoPlatform
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>

--047d7bea44cc55ff4c04f7a4a6a4
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Treating testnet differently is quite the norm, we have th=
at in BIP 32, 38, 70, SIPA private keys (no BIP for that I guess), bitcoin =
addresses etc. At the same time none of them define values for alt coins as=
 far as I recall.</div>
<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Apr 2=
2, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Tamas Blummer <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:t=
amas@bitsofproof.com" target=3D"_blank">tamas@bitsofproof.com</a>&gt;</span=
> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style=3D"word-wrap:break-word">I use se=
veral test chains while testing my software, the official test net, a stand=
alone net in house and even chains only created on the fly for unit tests. =
I found no use of distinguishing serialization of keys while using any of t=
hem.<div>
<div><div><br></div><div>If you have some deep insights about why this is n=
eeded share it, as I am not goint to guess your valuable thoughts.</div><di=
v class=3D""><div><br style=3D"text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-v=
ariant:normal;text-align:-webkit-auto;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;=
line-height:normal;text-transform:none;font-size:12px;white-space:normal;fo=
nt-family:Helvetica;word-spacing:0px">
<span style=3D"text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;te=
xt-align:-webkit-auto;font-style:normal;display:inline!important;font-weigh=
t:normal;float:none;line-height:normal;text-transform:none;font-size:12px;w=
hite-space:normal;font-family:Helvetica;word-spacing:0px">Regards,</span></=
div>
<div><br style=3D"text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal=
;text-align:-webkit-auto;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:n=
ormal;text-transform:none;font-size:12px;white-space:normal;font-family:Hel=
vetica;word-spacing:0px">
<span style=3D"text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;te=
xt-align:-webkit-auto;font-style:normal;display:inline!important;font-weigh=
t:normal;float:none;line-height:normal;text-transform:none;font-size:12px;w=
hite-space:normal;font-family:Helvetica;word-spacing:0px">Tamas Blummer</sp=
an><span style=3D"text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal=
;text-align:start;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;t=
ext-transform:none;font-size:12px;white-space:normal;font-family:Helvetica;=
word-spacing:0px"><br style=3D"text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-v=
ariant:normal;text-align:-webkit-auto;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;=
line-height:normal;text-transform:none;font-size:12px;white-space:normal;fo=
nt-family:Helvetica;word-spacing:0px">
<span style=3D"text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;te=
xt-align:-webkit-auto;font-style:normal;display:inline!important;font-weigh=
t:normal;float:none;line-height:normal;text-transform:none;font-size:12px;w=
hite-space:normal;font-family:Helvetica;word-spacing:0px"><a href=3D"http:/=
/bitsofproof.com" target=3D"_blank">http://bitsofproof.com</a></span>
</span></div>
<br></div><div class=3D""><div><div>On <a href=3D"tel:22.04.2014" value=3D"=
+4522042014" target=3D"_blank">22.04.2014</a>, at 17:32, Mark Friedenbach &=
lt;<a href=3D"mailto:mark@monetize.io" target=3D"_blank">mark@monetize.io</=
a>&gt; wrote:</div>
<br><blockquote type=3D"cite">Testnet vs mainnet is quite a separate issue =
than bitcoin vs altcoin.<br>Unfortunately few of the alts ever figured this=
 out.<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div><br>---------------=
---------------------------------------------------------------<br>

Start Your Social Network Today - Download eXo Platform<br>
Build your Enterprise Intranet with eXo Platform Software<br>
Java Based Open Source Intranet - Social, Extensible, Cloud Ready<br>
Get Started Now And Turn Your Intranet Into A Collaboration Platform<br>
<a href=3D"http://p.sf.net/sfu/ExoPlatform" target=3D"_blank">http://p.sf.n=
et/sfu/ExoPlatform</a><br>_______________________________________________<b=
r>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-develo=
pment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>

--047d7bea44cc55ff4c04f7a4a6a4--