1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <gmaxwell@gmail.com>) id 1YQgzJ-00082o-8W
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 25 Feb 2015 18:47:13 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.213.171 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.213.171; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
helo=mail-ig0-f171.google.com;
Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com ([209.85.213.171])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1YQgzI-0000z7-6H
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 25 Feb 2015 18:47:13 +0000
Received: by mail-ig0-f171.google.com with SMTP id h15so38004609igd.4
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:47:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.66.170 with SMTP id g10mr28921187igt.49.1424890026869;
Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:47:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.107.16.80 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:47:06 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 18:47:06 +0000
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgQOvaOT=CZD-=9Rc-A2WbPygV=Jf9jCwjgZ1oB4oqavhA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(gmaxwell[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1YQgzI-0000z7-6H
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] BCF 2012 Miner vote
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 18:47:13 -0000
It would appear that the Bitcoin Foundation has decided that their
next two seats would be decided by miners. (More information
available at: https://bitcoinfoundation.org/forum/index.php?/topic/1255-blockchain-voting/#entry13453
)
Unfortunately, they seem to have not provided the software needed to
participate.
I've taken Luke DashJr's somewhat notorious IsNotorious patch, which
he's used previously to block things like the Horse Stapler Battery
dust-spam attacks and re-purposed it so miners can avoid casting votes
in the election that they don't intend to cast.
Not really an ideal fit, but the code has the benefit of having been
run in production for some time; a necessity for deployment on short
notice.
A patch (against git master, but should apply to 0.10 cleanly at least
and probably other versions) is available at:
https://people.xiph.org/~greg/bcf2012.patch
Let me know if you have any trouble applying it, I'll be glad to do my
civic duty and do what I can to help people participate with the
system was clearly intended by the design.
[Please note that I am relying on some claims from reddit for some of
the candidate addresses (
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2x3ffk/bitcoin_foundation_runoff_voting_live_stats_2015/
) because the official voting software is more or less completely
busted for me and I can only see some of the candidates. If any are
wrong, please let me know.]
Cheers.
|
