1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <thomasv@electrum.org>) id 1Yy1OG-0005mv-5W
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 28 May 2015 17:14:44 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.76) id 1Yy1OF-00019D-5N
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 28 May 2015 17:14:44 +0000
Received: from mfilter23-d.gandi.net (mfilter23-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.151])
by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084D441C07B
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Thu, 28 May 2015 19:14:37 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter23-d.gandi.net
Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197])
by mfilter23-d.gandi.net (mfilter23-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180])
(amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VOtoZsy9e1tP
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Thu, 28 May 2015 19:14:05 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: 78.55.69.210
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (f055069210.adsl.alicedsl.de [78.55.69.210])
(Authenticated sender: thomasv@electrum.org)
by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8BE7841C04E
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Thu, 28 May 2015 19:14:05 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <55674CDD.8080703@electrum.org>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 19:14:05 +0200
From: Thomas Voegtlin <thomasv@electrum.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <16096345.A1MpJQQkRW@crushinator>
<CABsx9T3-zxCAagAS0megd06xvG5n-3tUL9NUK9TT3vt7XNL9Tg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T3-zxCAagAS0megd06xvG5n-3tUL9NUK9TT3vt7XNL9Tg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1Yy1OF-00019D-5N
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step
function
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 17:14:44 -0000
Le 28/05/2015 17:53, Gavin Andresen a =E9crit :
>=20
> So my straw-man proposal would be: max size 2x average size over last =
144
> blocks, calculated at every block.
>=20
I like that idea.
Average is a better choice than median. The median is not well defined
on discrete sets, as shown in your example, and there is no need to be
robust to outliers, thanks to the max size.
|
