summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/87/c45aebac64a7d6bf87a5ab4794aa3a13d763fe
blob: 2529f86056a7832d5bc119b1f96c8a5086634fe3 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
Return-Path: <sjors@sprovoost.nl>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EA0EBDB
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue,  5 Dec 2017 20:00:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com
	[66.111.4.29])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5F2A411
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue,  5 Dec 2017 20:00:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
	by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA8C722D75;
	Tue,  5 Dec 2017 15:00:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160])
	by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 05 Dec 2017 15:00:06 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sprovoost.nl; h=
	cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version
	:references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=
	fm1; bh=/tweC7ySzWSDU2eWCCKsAgiXiEmsTkFng8W1iy76BR4=; b=Mg/uvwNH
	vFGBSj9fSNSJU+A40PhsU+PKd7Rrsm/wILBt2xQ+xTbr2+bB9La+Lq0Z+JN4AIyz
	CLu/8SEFjEGHw29zgsAtQzEVw1ZsczjQk8b2n6Jly0zFKeO2vG6j/zEgIWD993Mr
	LAivPHhmigHAMjGWj3JQlPKwkIeIgkSzotMw2qbW3URn0mf+EQLj2bSMErBqJGiW
	fASeSAIqhxaK59DbwTA+xw2O0ywKJRTMaBa364eKvkoQ+OWGYlsVZnY5p74jGU1G
	hh6dQjEMn485n0tzs3sXGsaqcPHtSwR8/x3zA6nrHlJupE6qe6j1d8Fu3sjk63vU
	eb5NuMZFX6VLVg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
	messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender
	:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=/tweC7ySzWSDU2eWCCKsAgiXiEmsT
	kFng8W1iy76BR4=; b=nSz1viPPC2S8+2Idtzg1byJIrs7C9C0aBctbILeSr9qtX
	dhz1IF220Cg4zsRz8DQGo5u1atUf1pUQoLHPnAXn8xoPN0IHO2HNXVwivMeIA++4
	pNFuz2S2AqLbfXhMp+N46VzOGnNRzWC9ZlTUbCZ2oSc4quiu+NSui8f7X1R1B8Xf
	rqEABnJtisbOJ1YUcPY9D4cqqnpqU+hOEbj9EHY7AxKYxWgSzO1AygD8d7MQjegi
	p8Op1LtdkDPolzm61wRwmAykXQ7YAfq+wESBdK1roPZCVJzBgcQM0w5aZmmYUS+L
	73qwGZfkGiN33SK4/2OcTmqgHiCS9wXewvfxd67Og==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:xvomWkn8gQHTStbOOmtPFsh7vTmKBlXEsGNm5lf99vtV6kmRsEhjLg>
Received: from [192.168.178.108] (54693d0f.cm-12-2a.dynamic.ziggo.nl
	[84.105.61.15])
	by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B4BEC7E26F;
	Tue,  5 Dec 2017 15:00:05 -0500 (EST)
From: Sjors Provoost <sjors@sprovoost.nl>
Message-Id: <FD79573C-4771-464B-A570-E2868BBA0CA5@sprovoost.nl>
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
	boundary="Apple-Mail=_DE7BD198-A6D9-4704-BB2A-328B2E8D5A34";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.1 \(3445.4.7\))
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 21:00:01 +0100
In-Reply-To: <201712051939.33238.luke@dashjr.org>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
	CryptAxe <cryptaxe@gmail.com>, Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
References: <AE14915B-37DF-4D94-A0B1-E32A26903807@sprovoost.nl>
	<201712051939.33238.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.4.7)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 20:05:14 +0000
Cc: Matt Corallo <matt@chaincode.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP-21 amendment proposal: -no125
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 20:00:08 -0000


--Apple-Mail=_DE7BD198-A6D9-4704-BB2A-328B2E8D5A34
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii

CryptAxe wrote:
> Perhaps instead of a flag that can be used to disable a specific =
operation, there should be a "-ignoredflags=3Dx,y,z" section of the URI =
that can be used to ignore whatever BIP this might also be useful for in =
the future?

I don't think all BIPs lend themselves to this pattern. Can you think of =
another example? I also suspect each ignored flag requires carefully =
defined behavior, so it's probably better to spell that out in the BIP.

I also wouldn't be surprised if this BIP will get superseded in its =
entirety in the not too distant future; I believe there's some earlier =
discussion on this list about variations on BIP-71. So I don't think =
there will be many additional params in the future that warrant =
abstraction.


Luke Dashjr wrote:
>> P.S. I'd similarly suggest adding a bech32 param, but that's for =
another
>> discussion
>=20
> Bech32 addresses are just normal addresses. What need is there for a =
param?
>=20
> Luke

Most wallets consider bech32 addresses to be invalid. This would allow =
merchants to display a backwards compatible P2SH address and allow =
modern wallets to use bech32. In fact, this should be encouraged because =
it's slightly cheaper for the recipient to spend these funds (but not =
worth even a tiny increase in shopping cart abandonment).

Once the new format has sufficient adoption, merchants can simply drop =
support for old wallets and not use this parameter.

Sjors

--Apple-Mail=_DE7BD198-A6D9-4704-BB2A-328B2E8D5A34
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=90A3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_DE7BD198-A6D9-4704-BB2A-328B2E8D5A34--