1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
|
Return-Path: <kalle@rosenbaum.se>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C27A267
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 26 Jul 2015 21:13:51 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-qg0-f52.google.com (mail-qg0-f52.google.com
[209.85.192.52])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 636ADF7
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 26 Jul 2015 21:13:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qgeu79 with SMTP id u79so40409229qge.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 26 Jul 2015 14:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=klSCYzmswuDW1alpU8bElnB7E4ksCYH3tG/N6RR/sqM=;
b=iHa1KTozUQ1pEe9ocWVlj3xiJXWIvNTvuSpi6ZOqzQeAI2hVyIi9WJDh63xbAwm7rh
BnYBh7E/44iT5wbN1pAe0DvDxMMyunf7CgotF16qoRp/LawY4K7RZqZvsa8fEH9p1Bd6
RiXJYv8XLMrdbk9G+F8dJuaucTqJbNddq76hJDkWOuA5t5KtTQVNQLAwQOc5s16Jc2H5
VlurH08TSRLY7flyDQ5TrpkojLDURCUe3ZzVX5KgSOnUb+M2u8pPRvaRnMuOhuS5NWWO
JwJ5BquWLX74C4NWYFZW4jALIYTIjcSn7ivJhPEcUy/+ygk6scxEsIkjFFcVbAxfin+U
PHCw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm98+lN8/zXitiACj2pl3ILRD0CA0FvUCrhMO7Jy7WXj00FY6pgo4YRVTL+6PXtaVutfHG5
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.144.9 with SMTP id 9mr32155432qhq.69.1437945229494; Sun,
26 Jul 2015 14:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.96.127.227 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 14:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDrickFojwmUi7GqAhSW5K0yTa_59VjKrY+wAXEq1MYUoA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPswA9w5Sgg6AV=9Pqx5sqbkdrwv9LmwoxmMu7xZsQSNXtmZnQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPg+sBjtovFpLoibpVGLsNJXexBcoiYzjrvctraXntCUZBJsGg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPswA9zhB4GV=JJ28RRLFNrkVwExUv36zujmuAjwPd6rG6rvzQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CALJP9GCBJiofY7k2RJ460CuLuWQunHcx7EcLi1-d07v76Y-E2g@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPswA9wqdbU0z8ydBt+9M0iQX0VSi1ce=dg3fR2_2bx3-vEqzA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPswA9z_xKY6v9=Ejh=01mZN0QCVo1e0RY1FTzXzS39i3tjgAw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPswA9xk5QYAXxQ6ES3cnNPeB1FTiiSJgLahLEkSk4CLpoM_QQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPg+sBiWykR6RaHhbyYQbL=A5t1TmHgEmS_sC7jj9d3SUTMO9g@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPswA9zycU0pwZKaHU9J3Tvg=ovLJ8TZ9OH6ebTPONaRaiOE8g@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPg+sBhuth22+vAHyS2iwpze8X=-b2wJQ5s1z2FhZ1jsLXobgQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPswA9yB3wfV1auXR=ggXjh+f1C3Qpkv8qP1miQwkc8R2_aBLg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPg+sBjp-BmSXhanOuKE0DN1wdfVwCtFwiAbPse1GLxy3+L3nA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPswA9zzKvh6G+NqzTmhrNXMSWOPtZ2DGW2t_2Jrisy8x9m2qw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPg+sBhZCayaxNg_thO=nzxvuo-xZ-ZeZMXEVWb6Mw2POreOZQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPswA9yFUAqFyNBFBnnwpT=B9RcdNssdjz-_KWbX5GuLM5Uyxw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPg+sBigK7K2YVnhcU5Ysf0d0Gbp+GaNdGoKZCco5zvYLKDxFw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPswA9wLDpf0Q3aL=a+uaqkFecPgC4ASj73XVfj=MOrof-yh1g@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDrickFojwmUi7GqAhSW5K0yTa_59VjKrY+wAXEq1MYUoA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 23:13:49 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPswA9yYOzehfd=UxV+EmNOSZnY9nif2Y1GZ_FEy7r5UdzGA0g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kalle Rosenbaum <kalle@rosenbaum.se>
To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 21:13:51 -0000
(Resending to the new bitcoin-dev list after sending to the old list)
2015-07-25 21:34 GMT+02:00 Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <jtimon@jtimon.cc>:
> Then why do you assume they have a policy limit that not even bitcoin cor=
e
> itself maintains (the default limit was moved from 42 to 83 [counting the
> op_return and pushes])?
>
> The policy check is not a consensus rule. Other implementations may have
> another default or not have a limit at all.
Thank you for pointing this out.
That's right. Bitcoin core now support 80 bytes data by default. And
yes, I was wrong in assuming 40 bytes policy in all implementations,
even if 40 bytes was the limit in bitcoin core at the time of writing
the BIP.
If there's a need to increase the size of the nonce, for example to
128 bits instead of the 48 bits as designed in BIP 120, then we can of
course do that, either now or in a subsequent version of PoP.
As noted before though, a longer nonce also means bigger QR codes
generated from the BIP 121 URIs. So I think that 48 bits is a good
tradeoff right now. And as stated in BIP120, a server generating PoP
requests should try to detect brute force attacks, or at least delay
the response (containing the nonce) by some 100 ms or so.
Do you think we need a bigger nonce? In that case, why?
If PoP later becomes an extension of BIP70, then there is no such size
constraint on the nonce, since it will be part of some kind of (e.g.)
PopRequest message and not contained in a QR encoded URI.
/Kalle
|
