1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <pete@petertodd.org>) id 1YEiNC-0004SJ-WC
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 23 Jan 2015 17:50:23 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org
designates 62.13.148.95 as permitted sender)
client-ip=62.13.148.95; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org;
helo=outmail148095.authsmtp.com;
Received: from outmail148095.authsmtp.com ([62.13.148.95])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1YEiNB-0003RB-Oh for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 23 Jan 2015 17:50:23 +0000
Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235])
by punt18.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t0NHoB0e022181;
Fri, 23 Jan 2015 17:50:11 GMT
Received: from [25.12.84.43] ([172.56.40.30]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t0NHo6l2023565
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Fri, 23 Jan 2015 17:50:08 GMT
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <CAJna-Hi4nUGoOm7ON=jbp-SFVO5-nrMMyNKNV6AYP0hJG_PZdw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJna-HjwMRff_+7BvcR2YME9f2yUQPvfKOGZ1qq9d0nOGqORkg@mail.gmail.com>
<54C267A1.8090208@gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgQSAj=YHhtvy=MY9GvbEZNxtLUwzfrdPnSQBUKZYdj4oA@mail.gmail.com>
<54C2766F.6030200@gmail.com>
<CAJna-Hi4nUGoOm7ON=jbp-SFVO5-nrMMyNKNV6AYP0hJG_PZdw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=UTF-8
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:49:59 -0800
To: slush <slush@centrum.cz>, Alan Reiner <etotheipi@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <087FD04D-4DBA-4E93-AA84-FD77AA9FE136@petertodd.org>
X-Server-Quench: 465dfdca-a328-11e4-b396-002590a15da7
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aQdMdAEUElQaAgsB AmMbWlNeVV17WGM7 ag1TcwBbfE5OQQZq
T0xPR01TWkFof2Re AEIcUhtxcgNDNndw bU4sWnZeCBIuJhdg
E01WHXAHZDJkdTIc WUZFdwNWdQpKLx5A PgF4GhFYa3VsFCMk
FAgyOXU9MCtSLCNN RwwLMWdaemckPhcH Zyc9PAkPPGs9ehkN BjgbBzYB
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 172.56.40.30/465
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1YEiNB-0003RB-Oh
Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUE
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 17:50:23 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 23 January 2015 08:35:23 GMT-08:00, slush <slush@centrum.cz> wrote:
>Oh, now I got the 'soft-fork' alternative. If that means that *senders*
>to
>Trezor need to be nice guys and use some special outputs, then it's,
>obviously, no-go solution.
That's what P2SH is for; the senders will just be sending to a P2SH address.
>I understand political aspect around hard-fork. Anyway, are there any
>other
>pending projects waiting for hard-fork?
Hard-forks aren't hard for directly political issues, they're politically hard because they're risky by requiring everyone yo upgrade at once. In the case of signature validation, that touches a *lot* of third party code that people rely on to avoid being defrauded.
FWIW I've actually got a half-finished writeup for how to use OP_CODESEPARATOR and a CHECKSIG2 soft-fork to have signatures sign fees and so forth.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.1.1
iQFQBAEBCAA6BQJUwonGMxxQZXRlciBUb2RkIChsb3cgc2VjdXJpdHkga2V5KSA8
cGV0ZUBwZXRlcnRvZGQub3JnPgAKCRAZnIM7qOfwhbwkCADP7AcJ6a6V/y7MHt2x
ZiCXYsfHq5j03kbSWXGi1Q/9RqWGVha1fhWPp62yhDxbWOfh5QKauCbrt2g1AqT3
xbnh+2XE1rApBQIiJ6u0wZmpCi+4EhH2M9R8UYu9oIMzBe4K2jhzUbzcOR9Qplyq
9j6yevNrvtNHZb2OTiaKelxnuZUEiAsONHPOvR8Fkflwbd/w279OeilRjHYt3A/J
U22KOwjNrpa7/QE/HeC0QINqr3S132Yg4iYFwPviBwGq/WXQuLHIzGtgKOzrIC1T
h6kpWO9CjSxVbjMrf68IrSHRv92K8y1LiHFRZvzp3ulzcGBo2btazmrp/fUDLCr0
6uFg
=uDeM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
