1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
|
Return-Path: <jannes.faber@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF64CDA4
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 7 Feb 2016 05:21:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com (mail-lb0-f175.google.com
[209.85.217.175])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FA4D112
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 7 Feb 2016 05:21:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id bc4so68331311lbc.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 06 Feb 2016 21:21:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=6UG+dzu4Uaup9n9XpSMVWyIDBG4v76nMzqE34tRnABQ=;
b=YaUkAqrKQO/6SwXBVgCMZZBTmgxVm2LRtW2w8/2c7gp/38De6u+pjuOYeGKwRR2lE6
voXhxpCP333d7AkRAwWytQsHMy1Aa1IQciYsyo4sbthulycYWVzGk7t1lRUO+FRi1/ai
IwlkSfOUZdRi2BvLbWw2LeDiQhvb0QlfDff2thJy/BCfaTlC4Oyj0SVqFIGJF8n3rsLS
HQ8Rs3PFuOvoo3rCLpVjhvF3uY8g/JqWlHLn13cBZHpIEG3sDrjzV7rTXI3dDsFs3zMx
Xu/k8OMFBkMP/4Iuxh9KfEeErZ/w0t1SxnDx7CHmPnlqYA9+YSE8HyLA1hPUVITsE3c2
x5Fw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=6UG+dzu4Uaup9n9XpSMVWyIDBG4v76nMzqE34tRnABQ=;
b=EDHXrqLswnOZiodbMbvz5loDJn+ysdGRXOZAaoXbHUBePC0ToXGiuabxk090YDjtOA
PoaP11+WRo8QE/OVyj5Pa9ft7AEtfTXttqeCW6ytFLfARMYF8r7+HQCWnSYg248hS7fn
fpOcnBO3ZX2mYA+qgp3Dos0nPSENWWiS59Iim5rgCLLNahqehkXRaTAGMjSJKDwH8kaC
AtNoUJWBh0mFONzXg9P4NO/RqFVvgBJ8LshtL15vUtW0tX9EOrQUJfIqYp9PBeYgto4s
25XjEqQPbHcN76nt85ccc0C4vXR4WDb6pAS3m8cfOic9obEshbXdxfpkaA6WSe7U8Lmr
AY+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSqO8RvFfc50Wj8037JuF6dgnskdH7Ldg5FBm/HoqR4Uq+g4a3DgundU4Syw5CpWg==
X-Received: by 10.112.201.67 with SMTP id jy3mr9087452lbc.25.1454822463418;
Sat, 06 Feb 2016 21:21:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com (mail-lb0-f173.google.com.
[209.85.217.173]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
xe8sm3166908lbb.41.2016.02.06.21.21.01
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Sat, 06 Feb 2016 21:21:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id cw1so68327202lbb.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 06 Feb 2016 21:21:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.132.6 with SMTP id oq6mr7426150lbb.38.1454822461676;
Sat, 06 Feb 2016 21:21:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.181.164 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 21:21:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.181.164 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 21:21:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T2LuMZciXpMiY24+rPzhj1VT6j=HJ5STtnQmnfnA_XFUw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABsx9T1Bd0-aQg-9uRa4u3dGA5fKxaj8-mEkxVzX8mhdj4Gt2g@mail.gmail.com>
<201602060012.26728.luke@dashjr.org>
<CABm2gDrns0+eZdLyNk=tDNbnMsC1tT1MfEY93cJf1V_8TPjmLA@mail.gmail.com>
<CABsx9T2LuMZciXpMiY24+rPzhj1VT6j=HJ5STtnQmnfnA_XFUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 06:21:00 +0100
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CABeL=0i8_Ns25=OaXG86uSsQKzPA2YbTU_zRj6k6K48aYhw3wA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABeL=0i8_Ns25=OaXG86uSsQKzPA2YbTU_zRj6k6K48aYhw3wA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jannes Faber <jannes.faber@gmail.com>
To: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a825c0a4558052b274077
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 14:45:06 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Increase block size limit to 2
megabytes
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 05:21:06 -0000
--047d7b3a825c0a4558052b274077
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On 6 Feb 2016 4:41 p.m., "Gavin Andresen via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> Responding to "28 days is not long enough" :
>
> I keep seeing this claim made with no evidence to back it up. As I said,
I surveyed several of the biggest infrastructure providers and the btcd
lead developer and they all agree "28 days is plenty of time."
28 days doesn't sound like enough for exchanges and others holding 3rd
party coins. They will have to start untangling the Bitcoins from
classiccoins immediately, while pausing all withdrawals. They *must* be
able to send their customers both coins as separate withdrawals. If not,
that amounts to theft of their customers funds.
(Note that the above describes the honest exchanges. Imagine the dishonest
ones that simply steal the classiccoins from their customers and sell them
for their own profit.)
The only other option is guaranteeing customers both coins in one
transaction, which they can't.
Surely you can't expect small entities to start putting in massive man
hours into this even before the hard fork has been triggered? Or even big
entities to have all that implemented and tested within *20* working days?
--
Jannes
--047d7b3a825c0a4558052b274077
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p dir=3D"ltr"><br>
On 6 Feb 2016 4:41 p.m., "Gavin Andresen via bitcoin-dev" <<a =
href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.lin=
uxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Responding to "28 days is not long enough" :<br>
><br>
> I keep seeing this claim made with no evidence to back it up.=C2=A0 As=
I said, I surveyed several of the biggest infrastructure providers and the=
btcd lead developer and they all agree "28 days is plenty of time.&qu=
ot;</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">28 days doesn't sound like enough for exchanges and othe=
rs holding 3rd party coins. They will have to start untangling the Bitcoins=
from classiccoins immediately, while pausing all withdrawals. They *must* =
be able to send their customers both coins as separate withdrawals. If not,=
that amounts to theft of their customers funds.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">(Note that the above describes the honest exchanges. Imagine=
the dishonest ones that simply steal the classiccoins from their customers=
and sell them for their own profit.)</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">The only other option is guaranteeing customers both coins i=
n one transaction, which they can't.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Surely you can't expect small entities to start putting =
in massive man hours into this even before the hard fork has been triggered=
? Or even big entities to have all that implemented and tested within *20* =
working days?</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">--<br>
Jannes</p>
--047d7b3a825c0a4558052b274077--
|
