1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
|
Return-Path: <mark@friedenbach.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63B0BAB6
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 29 Sep 2017 15:22:18 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pf0-f173.google.com (mail-pf0-f173.google.com
[209.85.192.173])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB33C467
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 29 Sep 2017 15:22:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pf0-f173.google.com with SMTP id y29so903453pff.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 29 Sep 2017 08:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=friedenbach-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
bh=C5bf392EmKv1ZosA891C/batIVt5mWTsFNyZTTFXVSY=;
b=iCLJYTh3cTkj4y8488bz+S1q4JDvODh9l6T3OI8nzyrO8OTIOVbqVhBsAn/jCT6X5T
n1ei5rz6vZdY3HM2uFgax43X9ep5maY/r5VY7X53gygRyalbVSk5qMAAIvIaWMs8fxnw
gMlVsDzYGPvLX16O0cQN7HTp90ojyFEadRvVUxg1fYWiNuH9FQDWW4V6FevN4CqDDqEV
Yat0gaYfEMZw56hfla8s1q+Kzfg1c9tqS5Zspw9CAiaqZv98HBLH+9Bam7QQRUAm8VTW
Xvhf5MGHKR+CewUiiABJJY3UQvjJ9MntrOuRnfUrw8zOfbv738AhRBH3wE0r8Z20ei+n
ty6w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
bh=C5bf392EmKv1ZosA891C/batIVt5mWTsFNyZTTFXVSY=;
b=JxQyTVoyBArrswsZluqqqymsX3TBCVcFfDEGi+IgtOeaZhQFL0INu56s38IRt+4azg
BaQ5W7doIaAXzHLXQwMLWq3mMNcdydmeo/MadV7sbZfzBYIkrAJ5q/EoBaq46zi158xx
mJBiV3Hy10ft3gy6e7KfRmMz3imLZNIYN6NhLlvjH1RKAFI+7j+QP+V8FQajDvgBt2ax
IKH7BBmKk9ca5WXRvT3fG41yejISaltfDPSq1uS1BzJrOv7vk7Fl7vKBoY8bEwcR5zS/
OavsIdkhKjyNkDm3UYH3VZWR1Ju0sCWeoXMACiOdveV2m/Ul0TJW6EyavNx+86b/Smw/
2goQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjITTl3161O2PUH2VvpVeF/n0QvuYzChMaSketxiZsYJDVGLTHQ
0XMSu1iFKC4fBByHgVfsNHme9N54yBw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QAVNzpy9Ofc7sBpu9ZfYwbMVCQaj5siU/5UYreSF+lEzyDOgsX0Ax8h0o1kR8jjVWClzSmtgw==
X-Received: by 10.84.218.198 with SMTP id g6mr7317854plm.23.1506698536170;
Fri, 29 Sep 2017 08:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:646:8080:1291:e45d:dd5d:7212:1e7c?
([2601:646:8080:1291:e45d:dd5d:7212:1e7c])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
y16sm6835943pfe.68.2017.09.29.08.22.14
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Fri, 29 Sep 2017 08:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15A402)
In-Reply-To: <CAEgR2PGrf+4pQRyNC_xKVEKXimKTWveGK9q6YJeZkG0_r=8tkg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 08:22:14 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5F7A4F74-B108-4E30-A3F4-4125BBD0F819@friedenbach.org>
References: <CAEgR2PGCZ=F85yjAbZgC6NtzhpdgBL3n4M2jowN12wJ7x-Ai1A@mail.gmail.com>
<CAEgR2PGrxDQE0k8WX4XXz9GN-RAL6JB51ST9Hdz=ba36gRCa6A@mail.gmail.com>
<CAEgR2PFjt=ihzRBhNXbHTAJz1R+3vz8o-zRZkDA3iBo39x9cTQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAEgR2PFfSjJjkTYq+DAmTzmkHPxqhn6fUDoXTzrRebz+OoUgqw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAEgR2PG5ZueHKDXbsPDEjQG7xAYBa_JAtPZo9n1V2=STC1srpA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAEgR2PGPQ1e9SmoWOS3V+N9v+OWiM4g3nPN3d9urc+DfkWEJ7A@mail.gmail.com>
<CAEgR2PEKkHH6+Sh8cQGF83-s1tpwQZgd0fiuNz_xyWu0mUPfCA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAEgR2PEyWFO1RFohVEpcb-M7aM-8xjCFvDPeJPD4zF4yTCyZ0A@mail.gmail.com>
<CAEgR2PGrf+4pQRyNC_xKVEKXimKTWveGK9q6YJeZkG0_r=8tkg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniele Pinna <daniele.pinna@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 15:23:36 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Rebatable fees & incentive-safe fee markets
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 15:22:18 -0000
This is correct. Under assumptions of a continuous mempool model however thi=
s should be considered the outlier behavior, other than a little bit of empt=
y space at the end, now and then. A maximum fee rate calculated as a filter o=
ver past block rates could constrain this outlier behavior from ever happeni=
ng too.
> On Sep 29, 2017, at 3:43 AM, Daniele Pinna <daniele.pinna@gmail.com> wrote=
:
>=20
> Maybe I'm getting this wrong but wouldn't this scheme imply that a miner i=
s incentivized to limit the amount of transactions in a block to capture the=
maximum fee of the ones included?
>=20
> As an example, mined blocks currently carry ~0.8 btc in fees right now. If=
I were to submit a transaction paying 1 btc in maximal money fees, then the=
miner would be incentivized to include my transaction alone to avoid that l=
ower fee paying transactions reduce the amount of fees he can earn from my t=
ransaction alone. This would mean that I could literally clog the network by=
paying 1btc every ten minutes.
>=20
> Am I missing something?
>=20
> Daniele=20
|
