1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
|
Return-Path: <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95D8A7A8
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:20:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wr0-f175.google.com (mail-wr0-f175.google.com
[209.85.128.175])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAC2AAB
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:20:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wr0-f175.google.com with SMTP id y90so40085961wrb.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=rBkiqOkUV/ebMh65NRhNkXwCZZ15bWK0U2GQbsiotb8=;
b=aaSgODKyBa32qCk+2ZnkZo/SXwwRhtH02f3KKtTGwmRNi7mu5g5MbfZU2ISQa+cXsQ
0yqDqNoKLB5054lcSf3T/GdO9pX2D/PM5pDCKlaJMz98Oil88YBuJfrFW5htZUPxZP8e
KTNeD92USMBw6xNANPgh6LQsk9O30224Zyxhx9bUuQYIR3WSHVUfofMwn3wNZH76feM0
DsL/RN6idtMLG0FE+aFZKaBEnvR+CkawLc3d8gGYQ6WhNH+HRDzxwCjBY6PIEuWxrJ9s
VXKCibNVcZtlYmZxb1spHQDuioODaxaqLe5LeAlTtgpBd22DMcfNRNRVAkDwTkPZRN1h
ipaw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=rBkiqOkUV/ebMh65NRhNkXwCZZ15bWK0U2GQbsiotb8=;
b=TvBhlAdnNMrjMa6Q2pVWVh9HUwMZI0OOI6o1J5YhvKfY6wgqY+YOAwjUg8QJYjBRoo
ecwykVtfb9TfaxRwyIqiTtmHjm+kK0xegxn2hxkLGXjW4lBEesk9/QaxQbOCV4DKldJ3
boJRgsqpBRzokWmCPDnua14ZcV8o+bbZqKEmrYm8VkRjZ/mpzvVFjtKvL8vVUEaWIpPE
5pRDLXQb/jgLSPYgAugRurh9Ob/eElDF25z/dWjfW5wu1TukbxwYi6cUu3Lcq1C9CZYr
/3zPWlPnFpzmjCEoDunXSXaa9cxzNBaMHcBXNvriMXdi2eV4dZz5fnpsIWEBE1kJAaaB
qRBw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H14JCItBHKwEQdK0IQpJitSOJZNiXh/BXsS5X7MpMTscinzCWRXX4GIAjpepUZuU5YetHjXcBI0u/Lpqg==
X-Received: by 10.223.133.182 with SMTP id 51mr5129446wrt.39.1490314832601;
Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.135.5 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <SC1P152MB1648D0F9DF4279C49D755233F53F0@SC1P152MB1648.LAMP152.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <SC1P152MB1648D0F9DF4279C49D755233F53F0@SC1P152MB1648.LAMP152.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:20:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPg+sBjrjUFJZnCtmcvZYs_pc4T3YzU_jtK+eZANyGKSLavrXg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juan Garavaglia <jg@112bit.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Issolated Bitcoin Nodes
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:20:34 -0000
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Juan Garavaglia via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Long story short, when nodes 0.13+ receive blocks from 0.13+ nodes all is
> ok, and those blocks propagate to older nodes with no issues. But when a
> block tries to be propagated from bitcoind 0.12.+ to newer ones those blocks
> are NOT being propagated to the peers with newer versions while these newer
> blocks are being propagated to peers with older versions with no issues.
>
> My conclusion is that we have a backward compatibility issue between 0.13.X+
> and older versions.
Hello Juan,
this is expected behaviour. Nodes with segwit active only download
blocks from other segwit peers, as old peers cannot provide the
witness data they need to verify the blocks.
--
Pieter
|
