1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
|
Return-Path: <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46D1C950
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:16:51 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-lf0-f50.google.com (mail-lf0-f50.google.com
[209.85.215.50])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EF4D11D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:16:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lf0-f50.google.com with SMTP id f6so94063007lfg.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc; bh=soyHUAoEBsVhkxp2TynacdfP9D1aX80EU5ImLOoIerc=;
b=0oK4uFmrppHz6B1BFfQUDnJYwF4gs0TX5GE4prANPBKFnTtetA/fT5wxIPdMf6Ux2r
8z0+KyI+1TzRHcG7BsGva31js3DkNVQBb1DK9zmjbRefjA4givoTXEtG03I2kR6RjHbn
N8+q7taLOvqn9Wp8WHO+Y7oJiFKSnl9JcsITkTTZPz701neMD/g/TOS3FxvU7/lCazlD
gpf7yIZ4K89uSkwMtBQVYpc6A14rfllN3ffrEH8/kojt14FBgMk3Xqu65qm/NUwh2m0o
31Z9jPiD2RDnH7nMqnjVrHLy9xGFKlpEcjni00b7qZ+rpF8jymQRsFzIMVEoTUsU01OW
9UVQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc;
bh=soyHUAoEBsVhkxp2TynacdfP9D1aX80EU5ImLOoIerc=;
b=aCe9OMLqS0Bm1+GWbNlBKsH8WA2KSy+OQjSp+6fXBS+XA9YEzb7xXv2T4gTO+6Fggm
QvrPY3M1bwxK0LCJj5zC4/P6cYKYwrNMSWOpTfyA1YFlxs5kHLYXNimf0tRCo/Vl93FT
APREvoFwELUkPMwhCAjP921Y/k9VzuZwTPzo4N4qsyqOcFJfi7xOwvToRmr7NCCt9Lq+
3aDWVQy4iapOGAQoycOHlSyT+2eBJBXGCuhbw2Jwze/TwhQLVcrKsv2k+/lsmzTLQV/p
h2ZAds/sWqn8UdZCrAcUBs2CsZA+MEWxmQLREqAaHMCR7YDmexjDeS++7CkQihRhNK7u
GBvw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLhyhY/ZucLQZi/+oIOZNrEsCqxRCKjJfngyDA3doJlpmcB/FcDDC/BEpAB6Cd0AXrWbMFVkupW+anKlQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.25.26.194 with SMTP id a185mr9398053lfa.156.1466684208554;
Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.180.101 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.180.101 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160623121000.GA20073@fedora-21-dvm>
References: <CAJowKg+zYtUnHv+ea--srehVa5K46sjpWbHVcVGRY5x0w5XRTQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20160621221347.GC10196@fedora-21-dvm>
<CABqynxJCiXL0djx+xt9i=HJqC=0=5sZ9ecL7k1_a_XHiJ8qibw@mail.gmail.com>
<20160623105632.GB19241@fedora-21-dvm>
<CAPg+sBg90FxbEy1smp9mn+djF-N6PdUprtQ7r_kgvKCGbTHndQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20160623113904.GA19686@fedora-21-dvm>
<CAPg+sBiqh80Q4Dfm0y6aEX+gHrcHZMq3tckejx8KDCPb-ikkOg@mail.gmail.com>
<20160623121000.GA20073@fedora-21-dvm>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:16:48 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPg+sBgCkD_54p10NgfDozFo+dNnm-mL1B=NyGYpkdrXgTtxUg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11403bd83faf290535f107c7
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Even more proposed BIP extensions to BIP 0070
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:16:51 -0000
--001a11403bd83faf290535f107c7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Jun 23, 2016 14:10, "Peter Todd" <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
> Right, so you accept that we'll exert some degree of editorial control;
the
> question now is what editorial policies should we exert?
No, I do not. I am saying that some degree of editorial control will
inevitably exist, simply because there is some human making the choice of
assigning a BIP number and merging. My opinion is that we should try to
restrict that editorial control to only be subject to objective process,
and not be dependent on personal opinions.
> My argument is that rejecting BIP75 is something we should do on
> ethical/strategic grounds. You may disagree with that, but please don't
troll
> and call that "advocating censorship"
I think that you are free to express dislike of BIP75. Suggesting to remove
it for that reason is utterly ridiculous to me, whatever you want to call
it.
--
Pieter
--001a11403bd83faf290535f107c7
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p dir=3D"ltr"><br>
On Jun 23, 2016 14:10, "Peter Todd" <<a href=3D"mailto:pete@pe=
tertodd.org">pete@petertodd.org</a>> wrote:</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">> Right, so you accept that we'll exert some degree o=
f editorial control; the<br>
> question now is what editorial policies should we exert?</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">No, I do not. I am saying that some degree of editorial cont=
rol will inevitably exist, simply because there is some human making the ch=
oice of assigning a BIP number and merging. My opinion is that we should tr=
y to restrict that editorial control to only be subject to objective proces=
s, and not be dependent on personal opinions.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">> My argument is that rejecting BIP75 is something we sho=
uld do on<br>
> ethical/strategic grounds. You may disagree with that, but please don&=
#39;t troll<br>
> and call that "advocating censorship"</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">I think that you are free to express dislike of BIP75. Sugge=
sting to remove it for that reason is utterly ridiculous to me, whatever yo=
u want to call it.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">-- <br>
Pieter<br>
</p>
--001a11403bd83faf290535f107c7--
|
