summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/85/710e23bf0ae9840fc9e9ee4b0d93557e6931f3
blob: fd4113a71c3994e24bee474ac3c29fd6ab902739 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C68CC481
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 16 Nov 2016 23:58:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-vk0-f43.google.com (mail-vk0-f43.google.com
	[209.85.213.43])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C0A92DC
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 16 Nov 2016 23:58:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vk0-f43.google.com with SMTP id p9so128696198vkd.3
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:58:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=jtimon-cc.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; 
	bh=AFKUQorNjBLAYvxHMN3icwtWlYAAj4rIXKH/4QS1KKg=;
	b=jTan1BCciiAIdqHqGpYestxFp3iYwQTa99G3YPQW4sZjsGnaYnzxjZZMbmnhyUHCRW
	RinfgU7jv4NKLu95G4LKwkjaVYtShd9gnlUheNqNz3bdYOanHBk0euqolFeOB81Ey9wi
	qFHXFsjCCTjOmsnYNpvGH9+kc8Ky6T+5zaMcsqdUKjZdhYaexzz9qzSPp7hXvKaqpN3t
	CMfO7k20xg5fx36AIZFFKd1cv4NhFhwtVkAocNdeX3OYpvijxAHaIFzKGRWh2IBNYxMr
	PvJzkowdWrhOJ3+sYcTgdbdKkGDjk5DUk2N+LVS4PkY7jisBnpIXFSGExxnfBkgbcRm5
	wsgg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=AFKUQorNjBLAYvxHMN3icwtWlYAAj4rIXKH/4QS1KKg=;
	b=SyUSmntlD/M4GTTA+Kb1GaO0xyE08zBH3clMtBimpKMd3DWo3iwCjvR+cuBOSahzks
	Fu52uiDQZNKPDF/4kmwlO7W9NMP3EpdUsRHrY5rO2OBv9a7zNtCB+rM8iY7TLKRr+i3+
	mJh6wzDVnZZOhBrBP6zhS0eXPaNgT621YO8a5Q0PSesCpXSpUIInC4f+4BmXBEqRfo89
	XhrxfoAF9aJq3fvNjv3MH+Oormhts/dw6DZyEHAUAZKZuur4WPPC7SQ+ci40C0Vyl+sP
	JkWk82/9oOM/sUU6E/i1ykuuA8JMdhmWWn03CLfcsiQWWyoMIF8fYu/jMhX+tZn3B+Dq
	px4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00Wh+HyPUaEnhZJtDbJFT86kFa40vwXr0jXGQ0mqu9MnU+LrSeE5q8DUEPVv4vv/CEZkwgUEF8m7R+0bQ==
X-Received: by 10.31.221.66 with SMTP id u63mr103533vkg.16.1479340699619; Wed,
	16 Nov 2016 15:58:19 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.41.15 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:58:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <e86b5b85-591d-5342-6a75-3ebd501f1789@thomaskerin.io>
References: <CAFp6fsGmynRXLCqKAA+iBXObGOZ2h3DVW8k5L9kSfbPmL1Y-QQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CEDAD65E-512A-43CA-9BD6-56F7D9E6897C@voskuil.org>
	<CADJgMzunxU2-7Z_ZPafNY4BPRu0x9oeh6v2dg0nUYqxJbXeGYA@mail.gmail.com>
	<33BFC318-0BB4-48DB-B5DC-08247FAC6E5A@voskuil.org>
	<CADL_X_dJ8YuDevKR4xA+PTy9D089dAeZ1F3ZwSYG6MrMvkLweg@mail.gmail.com>
	<A98BB7F2-7AE2-4D84-9F38-7E7E9D5D3210@voskuil.org>
	<e86b5b85-591d-5342-6a75-3ebd501f1789@thomaskerin.io>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:58:19 +0100
Message-ID: <CABm2gDqy+iBdw3W2dap8rdi5TD-5_VSmFnakvEbYeAtgpdLgMg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thomas Kerin <me@thomaskerin.io>, 
	Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP Proposal] Buried Deployments
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 23:58:20 -0000

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Thomas Kerin via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> BIP30 actually was given similar treatment after a reasonable amount of time
> had passed.
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L2392

This is not really the same. BIP30 is not validated after BIP34 is
active because blocks complying with BIP34 will always necessarily
comply with BIP30 (ie coinbases cannot be duplicated after they
include the block height).