1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <pw@vps7135.xlshosting.net>) id 1SeOgT-00035G-I2
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:50:49 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from vps7135.xlshosting.net ([178.18.90.41])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1SeOgS-0007py-MR for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:50:49 +0000
Received: by vps7135.xlshosting.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A4567244A4A; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:50:41 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:50:40 +0200
From: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
To: thomasV1@gmx.de
Message-ID: <20120612105038.GA29784@vps7135.xlshosting.net>
References: <20120610090357.GA25567@vps7135.xlshosting.net>
<CABsx9T3uaEBikhUo7j52mauBx0mnfk2_1mq0QOQBZVptoMB6HA@mail.gmail.com>
<20120611181022.10710@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120611181022.10710@gmx.net>
X-PGP-Key: http://sipa.ulyssis.org/pubkey.asc
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(pieter.wuille[at]gmail.com)
0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is
CUSTOM_MED
-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain 1.2 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit,
and not from a mailing list
X-Headers-End: 1SeOgS-0007py-MR
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP22/getmemorypool
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:50:49 -0000
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 08:10:22PM +0200, thomasV1@gmx.de wrote:
>
> > discussion back here. The executive summary: Pieter and I feel like
> > BIP 22 is overly complicated, and would like it to be simpler. I'd
> > especially like to hear what people think will be the "will be used by
> > lots of pool customers" features and what are the "will be used by
> > less than 5% of pool customers" features.
>
> will be used by Electrum servers
Please. This is not about whether getmemorypool is useful (at least I am
a big fan of BIP22's big picture). It's about whether it needs 20 optional
features.
--
Pieter
|
