summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/84/13f8f40c06e7098e613eb2ec5922bd99b48d9d
blob: 2a2c48a479d8cc2dc444384873a290cf09955b36 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
Return-Path: <achow101@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDC90B01
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat, 10 Sep 2016 01:31:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-qk0-f173.google.com (mail-qk0-f173.google.com
	[209.85.220.173])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B88F26F
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat, 10 Sep 2016 01:31:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qk0-f173.google.com with SMTP id w204so95914923qka.0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 09 Sep 2016 18:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
	:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=R2kfURSO6/52YbYf6ERBpn9X7OnWTmmnJVN3RQZIcoI=;
	b=ZEpWvZN+Ipdl+ZFdN5Pc3p7qraa/cWeO9zNnFVepX6nNJQgoghKO8/tWauERKWbqbV
	abUObbIWFT9imuWts4UKkaMNOMNBuVot7XF/ldxeAJUqBgmmtLl/9Mv/ieKo2/4fA/X6
	E6ZFEA/1zbDTiim8F0UdJbTGG5ewrqlRKypssRpycM+dZziIChbyq6ZBobqbcLXJCSjN
	MYxaoyRy2QSPRpt957IjHDx2yoagLWHK+XnEZ473Jgo/8tu+EXr6Q96ZwSUiUjN6RdMv
	pI6yvO0Wc/YhGz+5Cgj3GZedkY18cTJBHc7xNCMcc8EMMVbNQZVs3VJRMS7+W7q46ZGz
	XHVw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=R2kfURSO6/52YbYf6ERBpn9X7OnWTmmnJVN3RQZIcoI=;
	b=I6YDVHoYBo5+JvgNcYWqoVFKvQXORUqsZQ6KxIlPdRaSp8KmEoTvLnFG4WcKz62FeH
	/P2SYnrqgyWqW7WRqeVGbfmQ2ggsuS3rnI09jCGLWOVfsrZI0EpuP071wEOKBlEhQmv+
	N8bh5ijMIGM0GlsRwYDbT/sNd2yss3+sPfjnjJUWb3BNxeupZVCRGIGziImCDInVMZym
	JG/ZN6d4EwPIwqa0PKsDuBnwgvmoh/eFyvO1QUtBMRy9AKQHLjTEsOKYjoVOD1DBn78S
	QloTorUphqGtN4fzdpMc2z4iHyk6M/6P/KVtKJXXhdOarwWk0EANn2sakH2g3Y0plC86
	QzJg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPt2Pni0rycppD4/IBdh0vCBhpP6wrouX9IwjlaWPDbG+XOcYmzGcdUgdEkDP6x+g==
X-Received: by 10.55.42.5 with SMTP id q5mr7596678qkh.232.1473471065397;
	Fri, 09 Sep 2016 18:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([129.2.206.174])
	by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r4sm3689061qkr.28.2016.09.09.18.31.04
	(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Fri, 09 Sep 2016 18:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
To: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>,
	Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
References: <CAAS2fgTYOUSm07N4NYDCsjjwSbAo_ye84UvbQF--3JzhLHkG0Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew C <achow101@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <38df6d39-5c88-9f01-3457-77c882440d42@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 21:31:16 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgTYOUSm07N4NYDCsjjwSbAo_ye84UvbQF--3JzhLHkG0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Completing the retirement of the alert system
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 01:31:06 -0000

ACK

Armory used to contain code for handling these alerts but that was
removed after the PR removing alerts from Bitcoin Core was merged.


On 9/9/2016 8:42 PM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> The alert system was a centralized facility to allow trusted parties
> to send messages to be displayed in wallet software (and, very early
> on, actually remotely trigger the software to stop transacting).
>
> It has been removed completely in Bitcoin Core after being disabled for=
 a while.
>
> While the system had some potential uses, there were a number of
> problems with it.
>
> The alert system was a frequent source of misunderstanding about the
> security model and 'effective governance', for example a years ago a
> BitcoinJ developer wanted it to be used to control fee levels on the
> network and few months back one of Bloq's staff was pushing for a
> scheme where "the developers" would use it to remotely change the
> difficulty-- apparently with no idea how abhorrent others would find
> it.
>
> The system also had a problem of not being scalable to different
> software vendors-- it didn't really make sense that core would have
> that facility but armory had to do something different (nor would it
> really make sense to constantly have to maintain some list of keys in
> the node software).
>
> It also had the problem of being unaccountable. No one can tell which
> of the key holders created a message. This creates a risk of misuse
> with a false origin to attack someone's reputation.
>
> Finally, there is good reason to believe that the key has been
> compromised-- It was provided to MTGox by a developer and MTGox's
> systems' were compromised and later their CEO's equipment taken by the
> Japanese police.
>
> In any case, it's gone now in Core and most other current software--
> and I think it's time to fully deactivate it.
>
> I've spent some time going around the internet looking for all
> software that contains this key (which included a few altcoins) and
> asked them to remove it. I will continue to do that.
>
> One of the facilities in the alert system is that you can send a
> maximum sequence alert which cannot be overridden and displays only a
> static key compromise text message and blocks all other alerts. I plan
> to send a triggering alert in the not-distant future (exact time to be
> announced well in advance) feedback on timing would be welcome.
>
> There are likely a few production systems that automatically shut down
> when there is an alert, so this risks some small one-time disruption
> of those services-- but none worse than if an alert were sent to
> advise about a new system upgrade.
>
> At some point after that, I would then plan to disclose this private
> key in public, eliminating any further potential of reputation attacks
> and diminishing the risk of misunderstanding the key as some special
> trusted source of authority.
>
> Cheers,
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev