1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
|
Return-Path: <thomas@thomaszander.se>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 975AF8A5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:23:17 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from pmx.vmail.no (pmx.vmail.no [193.75.16.11])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6442489
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:23:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pmx.vmail.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (pmx.isp.as2116.net) with SMTP id 480A1404AC
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:23:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp.bluecom.no (smtp.bluecom.no [193.75.75.28])
by pmx.vmail.no (pmx.isp.as2116.net) with ESMTP id 16EDD4049A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:23:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pluto.localnet (unknown [81.191.183.21])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.bluecom.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 067D8C2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:23:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Zander <thomas@thomaszander.se>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:23:13 +0200
Message-ID: <1963286.x5NhlJ5RfS@pluto>
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.1 (Linux/3.16.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.14.2; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDr98G1K1F7YapCQbKtQ2YEsW8FrYVnFtk+M2Hfvy4WgfQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABsx9T16fH+56isq95m4+QWsKwP==tf75ep8ghnEcBoV4OtZJA@mail.gmail.com>
<1679272.aDpruqxXDP@coldstorage>
<CABm2gDr98G1K1F7YapCQbKtQ2YEsW8FrYVnFtk+M2Hfvy4WgfQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fees and the block-finding process
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:23:17 -0000
On Wednesday 12. August 2015 10.51.57 Jorge Tim=F3n wrote:
> > Personally I think its a bad idea to do write the way you do, which=
is=20
that
> > some people have to prove that bad things will happen if we don't m=
ake a
> > certain change. It polarizes the discussion and puts people into ca=
mps.
> > Peoplehave to choose sides.
>=20
> Whatever,
No, please don't just say "whatever". Show some respect, please.
If you have the courage to say people are spreading FUD you really shou=
ld=20
have already exhausted all possible avenues of cooperation.
Now you look like you give up and blame others.
> I just give up trying that people worried about a non-increase in the=
short
> term answer to me that question. I will internally think that they ju=
st
> want to spread fud, but not vey vocal about it.
Again, I've been trying really hard to give you answers, straight answe=
rs.
It saddens me if you really are giving up trying to understand what peo=
ple=20
equally enthusiastic about this technology may see that you don't see.
> It's just seems strange to me that you don't want to prove to me that=
's not
> the case when it is so easy to do so: just answer the d@#/&m question=
.
In the evolution of Bitcoin over the next couple of years we need bigge=
r=20
blocks for a lot of different reasons. One of them is that LN isn't her=
e.
The other is that we have known bugs that we have to fix, and that will=
take=20
time. Time we are running out of.
To buy more time, get bigger blocks now.
Anyway, I dislike your approach, as I said in the previous mail.
Its not about people spreading FUD or sidestepping the question, it is =
about=20
keeping the discussion civilised. You are essentially the one that ask=
s;
"if you are not beating your wife, please prove it to me".
And the you get upset when I try to steer the conversation into less=20=
black/white situations...
And, yes, that analogy is apt because you can't prove either.
--=20
Thomas Zander
|
