1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
|
Return-Path: <fresheneesz@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93E9C000B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 11 Mar 2022 05:42:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2EB9847CE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 11 Mar 2022 05:42:17 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Yiig_dE8-eZE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 11 Mar 2022 05:42:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-ej1-x62c.google.com (mail-ej1-x62c.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62c])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AC1E8428D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 11 Mar 2022 05:42:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id dr20so16720333ejc.6
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 10 Mar 2022 21:42:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=iKPkX/DWaSJHxxn5GWi5AedJUoPUqqEAH1o+jzdJ+DA=;
b=idu9LXN1h0Frx9AeeRmn1eOEgakn0/gDqgc1Jbm4gPCuC8WsrSAlfYg7imZMjAJLOu
+WOGTYaP0LdDTrXJfngYGv6MfxXT8hAW/RSna3FXUZZfAVAsWITuXuq5QG6iFfe97Tof
wVC488V+rSe09ddHj5WCdMZSMnHP4roLlBDfnB+OiybbG3KCEOG5DVwwP5PyGIBqWSzM
U30rOiu2Csl1MK6Erpz2S88wCelJZlWz/AJsTeLz8W4+laV2aPJCH5MKxP1hPNZGmdtd
/bcXB+mHKdUuU2wlIaZdBRLFzdEtarX1GqA7Ijj8I7ZMJx4ca6fVkzZq7ueUbjeBZ7c9
rgSg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=iKPkX/DWaSJHxxn5GWi5AedJUoPUqqEAH1o+jzdJ+DA=;
b=EycMV2RAqM0BdvNQY1nq64Gnqh6xfvzxhIpqEdETC6VuyxVYLTrC1ZNM+XhSUAH/Th
a5PgGVDZexCsGU7aK6exed0SJdE3MuJbEMJ2OJ7VutwJ04AlhPgIDuA1MGFYNSQfJrxS
PirNeqF/p4Bhq6B4K5hmqsIOVVA+u333XV4xbgFuw+c7z3Tg/DuWYgkBcMNTWXM7KARw
X37gdO3i8XdDdkV8S6KWXkGQqVzCsSQirthHIpZf0WmBpX2tXfnmK+UHwMioohd6cyVp
Iqwkw5Hz+n1pmcbtHZgpEX9+oeHAs33eNsTg+Y+0uiaz3Z3RX77EVsNslHhrk8siy/W2
hPEA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530yRJtkA4I1pWe+z7utoFTbAPlj5gYqXljFb0TYj5A2rcQn0nZA
BME5Hrd8kdcCd2xFNrTw8KVi6vOT/EfG5W1v7v4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx5mw5YX5K2t02L8pPZy07ysCl8MP/V/la1WgHYs6/1N3Pud3030x2mlJzF28fxzsXkzwUbgdC6ECL2qatvM24=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:8686:b0:6db:ac7b:c383 with SMTP id
qa6-20020a170907868600b006dbac7bc383mr392799ejc.709.1646977333941; Thu, 10
Mar 2022 21:42:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMZUoKkTDjDSgnqhYio8Lnh-yTdsNAdXbDC9RQwnN00RdbbL6w@mail.gmail.com>
<202203110028.09249.luke@dashjr.org>
In-Reply-To: <202203110028.09249.luke@dashjr.org>
From: Billy Tetrud <billy.tetrud@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 23:41:58 -0600
Message-ID: <CAGpPWDaQrFPUGUqqDUQ4RhxT2G5nVP6wqqPOp60Yh5qocOfZ2A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f157e505d9eacac4"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 08:35:20 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Speedy Trial
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 05:42:17 -0000
--000000000000f157e505d9eacac4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> BIP 8 did in fact have broad consensus
I hear you claim this often Luke, but claiming its so does not make it so.
Do you think BIP8 still has broad consensus? If that's the case, maybe all
that's needed is to gather some evidence
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7rXOgL4oFQ> and present it.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 6:38 PM Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Friday 11 March 2022 00:12:19 Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > The "no-miner-veto" concerns are, to an extent, addressed by the short
> > timeline of Speedy Trial. No more waiting 2 years on the miners dragging
> > their feet.
>
> It's still a miner veto. The only way this works is if the full deployment
> (with UASF fallback) is released in parallel.
>
> > If you are so concerned about listening to legitimate criticism, maybe
> you
> > can design a new deployment mechanism that addresses the concerns of the
> > "devs-do-not-decide" faction and the "no-divegent-consensus-rules"
> > faction.
>
> BIP8 already does that.
>
> > A major contender to the Speedy Trial design at the time was to mandate
> > eventual forced signalling, championed by luke-jr. It turns out that, at
> > the time of that proposal, a large amount of hash power simply did not
> have
> > the firmware required to support signalling. That activation proposal
> > never got broad consensus,
>
> BIP 8 did in fact have broad consensus before some devs decided to ignore
> the
> community and do their own thing. Why are you trying to rewrite history?
>
> > and rightly so, because in retrospect we see
> > that the design might have risked knocking a significant fraction of
> mining
> > power offline if it had been deployed. Imagine if the firmware couldn't
> be
> > quickly updated or imagine if the problem had been hardware related.
>
> They had 18 months to fix their broken firmware. That's plenty of time.
>
> Luke
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
--000000000000f157e505d9eacac4
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">>=C2=A0
BIP 8 did in fact have broad consensus<div><br></div><div>I hear you claim =
this often Luke, but claiming its so does not make it so. Do you think BIP8=
still has broad consensus? If that's the case, maybe all that's ne=
eded is to gather some <a href=3D"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DU7rXOgL=
4oFQ" target=3D"_blank">evidence</a> and present it.=C2=A0</div></div><br><=
div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Thu, Mar=
10, 2022 at 6:38 PM Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev <<a href=3D"mailto:bitc=
oin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linu=
xfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" s=
tyle=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);pad=
ding-left:1ex">On Friday 11 March 2022 00:12:19 Russell O'Connor via bi=
tcoin-dev wrote:<br>
> The "no-miner-veto" concerns are, to an extent, addressed by=
the short<br>
> timeline of Speedy Trial.=C2=A0 No more waiting 2 years on the miners =
dragging<br>
> their feet.<br>
<br>
It's still a miner veto. The only way this works is if the full deploym=
ent <br>
(with UASF fallback) is released in parallel.<br>
<br>
> If you are so concerned about listening to legitimate criticism, maybe=
you<br>
> can design a new deployment mechanism that addresses the concerns of t=
he<br>
> "devs-do-not-decide" faction and the "no-divegent-conse=
nsus-rules"<br>
> faction.<br>
<br>
BIP8 already does that.<br>
<br>
> A major contender to the Speedy Trial design at the time was to mandat=
e<br>
> eventual forced signalling, championed by luke-jr.=C2=A0 It turns out =
that, at<br>
> the time of that proposal, a large amount of hash power simply did not=
have<br>
> the firmware required to support signalling.=C2=A0 That activation pro=
posal<br>
> never got broad consensus,<br>
<br>
BIP 8 did in fact have broad consensus before some devs decided to ignore t=
he <br>
community and do their own thing. Why are you trying to rewrite history?<br=
>
<br>
> and rightly so, because in retrospect we see <br>
> that the design might have risked knocking a significant fraction of m=
ining<br>
> power offline if it had been deployed.=C2=A0 Imagine if the firmware c=
ouldn't be<br>
> quickly updated or imagine if the problem had been hardware related.<b=
r>
<br>
They had 18 months to fix their broken firmware. That's plenty of time.=
<br>
<br>
Luke<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">=
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
--000000000000f157e505d9eacac4--
|
