summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/80/5f88016aac762c4d3dd1a89b51d60255d4666e
blob: dde24e46a233abd300975d17c2c3cfff1d4de2cd (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>) id 1Qp6Ik-0000tg-2N
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 04 Aug 2011 22:22:02 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bluematt.me
	designates 173.246.101.161 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=173.246.101.161;
	envelope-from=bitcoin-list@bluematt.me; helo=mail.bluematt.me; 
Received: from vps.bluematt.me ([173.246.101.161] helo=mail.bluematt.me)
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1Qp6Ij-0005V9-8I for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 04 Aug 2011 22:22:02 +0000
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:9ff2:1:2c0:caff:fe33:858b] (unknown
	[IPv6:2001:470:9ff2:1:2c0:caff:fe33:858b])
	by mail.bluematt.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD8162CCD
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Fri,  5 Aug 2011 00:21:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgSmHJOd38FicROapfcYoxooCvg_Hh1Cc1r1WjOkGW+yjA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201108041423.14176.andyparkins@gmail.com>
	<201108041922.16956.andyparkins@gmail.com>
	<1312483196.3109.38.camel@Desktop666>
	<201108042042.55214.andyparkins@gmail.com>
	<82CEB610-9821-4928-8A13-30088A59223C@andrewschaaf.com>
	<1312490305.3109.46.camel@Desktop666> <4E3B18F3.4010605@justmoon.de>
	<CAAS2fgSmHJOd38FicROapfcYoxooCvg_Hh1Cc1r1WjOkGW+yjA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-iDx+cBir3Fc4zTj5Ffqe"
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:21:53 +0200
Message-ID: <1312496513.3109.57.camel@Desktop666>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.8 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain
X-Headers-End: 1Qp6Ij-0005V9-8I
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Double spend detection to speed up
 transaction trust
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 22:22:02 -0000


--=-iDx+cBir3Fc4zTj5Ffqe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 18:18 -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> I don't have much
> doubt that people doing the "connect to everyone" are already causing
> harm. There are some nodes in .ru/.ua which aggressively connect to me
> (instant reconnects if I hang up on them) which have never passed me a
> transaction in all my available logs.

I've been thinking about going through my logs to see how many nodes I
am connected to that are clearly bad (like those), but I suppose you
beat me to it.  Should such connections not be dropped over time as they
are clearly not functioning nodes?

--=-iDx+cBir3Fc4zTj5Ffqe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=PR4q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-iDx+cBir3Fc4zTj5Ffqe--