1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <adam@cypherspace.org>) id 1VrDP7-0002s9-LX
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:02:41 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.194])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1VrDP5-0002U4-N2
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:02:41 +0000
Received: from netbook (199-36-244-25.mccarran.com [199.36.244.25])
by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus0) with ESMTP (Nemesis)
id 0MZjOA-1W7Esv3l2k-00L7y2; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:02:32 -0500
Received: by netbook (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id AD64F2E49D6; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:51:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: by flare (hashcash-sendmail, from uid 1000);
Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:51:06 +0100
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:51:06 +0100
From: Adam Back <adam@cypherspace.org>
To: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20131212205106.GA4572@netbook.cypherspace.org>
References: <52A3C8A5.7010606@gmail.com>
<1795f3067ba3fcdd0caf978cc59ff024.squirrel@fruiteater.riseup.net>
<52A435EA.7090405@gmail.com> <201312081237.24473.luke@dashjr.org>
<CANAnSg2OrmQAcZ+cZdtQeADicH3U29QOgYPfP1AQhOMP6+P1wg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgR0khyJxmz9c2Oc87hOFgiNuiPJuaeugGajdo_EcKEW9w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgR0khyJxmz9c2Oc87hOFgiNuiPJuaeugGajdo_EcKEW9w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Hashcash: 1:20:131212:gmaxwell@gmail.com::6Hs8vDawiXbF0BQD:0000000000000000000
0000000000000000000000004MkA
X-Hashcash: 1:20:131212:drak@zikula.org::Q5BzDLtFSq80aTiN:000Xvx
X-Hashcash: 1:20:131212:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net::B//0MJxbogU7C
NuA:000000000000000000000Bj+
X-Hashcash: 1:20:131212:adam@cypherspace.org::BJhNxu6lhNOlR/tG:00000000000000000
00000000000000000000000055Rs
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:zLdVaK7SPKBiI2lF1w7fM7eU4IiuAN2eYq15QLXRPls
H7AYQyOC8ddlYcbhMwRkh7kWQNDjviXe1dNVjZ81nvlL+W4GCy
DyiZr/eKBymz7Vc2TWRSKbXcjUAjlhElfxtkZjJKGX/FjcMAi0
YRIj1XVv8fAQz+YIjxopNQvLnvzwibzM8oQSNZLpN5hmjzC5BC
BhbIhSTr2nDjqWI0NHjRjbzq8J5HJMBjPu/R+E4wpgvcs7qvaV
skrfNgqnypUHRuQKYMbMBnbeWn6i+wtxlwxo9eFeRRFgzeLiMu
7lCOzijjXepC+NkRK3EtDjI+zGGYQYvsg2mq8sLSl7Nj9yEzrc
7ZHsM4PyPT6VlnI+dvzrSbUn2Gxnh4/OZyc3Cl7lN
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [74.208.4.194 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information. [URIs: doubleclick.net]
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1VrDP5-0002U4-N2
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Dedicated server for bitcoin.org,
your thoughts?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:02:41 -0000
I think the one thing that SSL does provide is some protection against AR=
P
or DNS poisoning to trick the user into downloading from a different site=
.
The PGP WoT surrounding bitcoin or OS related ISOs be weak - I am not sur=
e
if I could even check it directly myself despite spending a few hours
tracking down keys and checking fingerprints of biz cards of core devs I =
met
in person, then that is a relevant point.
Adam
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 11:25:24AM -0800, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Drak <drak@zikula.org> wrote:
>> BGP redirection is a reality and can be exploited without much
>
>You're managing to argue against SSL. Because it actually provides
>basically protection against an attacker who can actively intercept
>traffic to the server. Against that threat model SSL is clearly=E2=80=94=
based
>on your comments=E2=80=94 providing a false sense of security.
>
>We _do_ have protection that protect against that=E2=80=94 the pgp signa=
ture,
>but they are far from a solution since people do not check that.
>
>(I'm not suggesting we shouldn't have it, I'm suggesting you stop
>arguing SSL provides protection it doesn't before you manage to change
>my mind!)
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------=
------
>Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
>Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
>Download it for free now!
>http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=3D111408631&iu=3D/4140/ost=
g.clktrk
>_______________________________________________
>Bitcoin-development mailing list
>Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
|
