1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <mark@monetize.io>) id 1UjfOe-0003yW-1E
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:46:44 +0000
Received: from mail-pd0-f172.google.com ([209.85.192.172])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1UjfOc-0000Nf-Iw
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:46:44 +0000
Received: by mail-pd0-f172.google.com with SMTP id t10so2894141pdi.3
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Mon, 03 Jun 2013 17:46:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s=20120113;
h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to
:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state;
bh=JgBDbOAsX8P2xPWkLWuskNqdihMlv/BLz7SGAs5N8Ew=;
b=hQEWxadFQ9m4thBYQqGuDO9NFfLHDkiQQjdlZZ0Bzaz/fRZWV1vpO6LPSdB5pyJhxu
N36nm9ZhqxEzmUVbl5Lx6hYHXkQnKPKd+3W25EExB02jcF6qQ5HpD8AsyNPHjhdi3Ex/
SOF7Uq10R/WCAW+0uF22r0n9ANnf9AFOwzcFtpKj9uJkoFmhtWm2vtiqXv8+w2GYxyjk
MZ3wDqncmoIq0xs7uQzQOt+ujtGCdzB8nuNFF+RZa7ZaOu8CZcnbQei2d4zqC+oa/VCa
en4T6GrsZ0Aqr9gjO5DkDSC7tWhTJrhhms5s48xegBCcX8b36m+dUMWA2vCeNHPW60Ux
M0hA==
X-Received: by 10.68.176.197 with SMTP id ck5mr25218915pbc.165.1370305364248;
Mon, 03 Jun 2013 17:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phobos.local (50-0-36-104.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net. [50.0.36.104])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
rn7sm60825906pbc.12.2013.06.03.17.22.42
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Mon, 03 Jun 2013 17:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51AD3353.10702@monetize.io>
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 17:22:43 -0700
From: Mark Friedenbach <mark@monetize.io>
Organization: Monetize.io Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <20130601193036.GA13873@savin>
<38A06794-B6B4-45F3-99C1-24B08434536D@gmail.com>
<20130602061327.GA14148@savin>
In-Reply-To: <20130602061327.GA14148@savin>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkV8F6khg3OBOXbY6zlOZ3f7oGiA99HZKlfuwNHyv25rD8OLwnwzE/WY7G6ztNPf+SBWVng
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [209.85.192.172 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-Headers-End: 1UjfOc-0000Nf-Iw
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: soft-fork to make
anyone-can-spend outputs unspendable for 100 blocks
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:46:44 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 10:32:07PM -0400, Gavin wrote:
>> Feels like a new opcode might be better.
>>
>> Eg <data> 100 OP_NOP1
>>
>> ... Where op_nop1 is redefined to be 'verify depth' ...
I would suggest the more general 'push depth onto stack'. You can then
use the usual math/relational operators which otherwise have seen little
use.
Assuming it's even a good idea to go down this route at all.
Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRrTNTAAoJEAdzVfsmodw4mf0QAJAej83Pth0ZVfua3I5+RR58
7gHpt2rBHP8KuwDH6J3VbxZDKy0n+6/nC5+kjI+G0tYGt3yU4wARJA+afB+zxScT
DPO1iMRxcwOz6KtPWpyCEEOW4ZlILQmbhGyA7XZ+Oy+hZZMBWvPCt4BQsyTjUJ4Y
+gTDqdkNk9B2HZh5gskXRkOYWGB9517tTQ0zYWLtVm2sgeJvRkd73WLZGHm4nrLI
20OLaTP0RuW5+qfV4BSQp/Y3k/9OqrAFXiXo5NAs6PL81x3/IDGKpsfnZNLxPU0i
QLg9RdHZ9769fTgACO8822pLaWQ4LtLB4FA/mVYBhr/ORWSIKfod7TPGF3AYiIpF
db2IESX2HFAxMQ9xTi/2R9zYwCvVpQWwZNse+DEMhoQhykcNv/+sZBE93xHGSgsq
XKBOXLJGCxnUwszz+CSmwrQVmwPqLAU/fFybnAI/6VHMMd8phgNV5oLluAaZyBTi
DpImUul2fqKaJeRjQBB1Qya7az0Qvf4LSHFDQKYYWG/H03R5CxFkxiM/XsiyuzpK
7+MVh6gnWaoayB/eAh0KVgWXUrQQGUBwvVmSk6DU73yQ8Db0BHaxBaUihlsJrMTX
Ybh8d8GSbXsaUjolvJ/dSclcAw7ovW91jqEhRoBq9AKQA23RjHChzT8M1UkXZclZ
8k6XWOJy+NaNmklEwMqF
=iDLz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
