1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
|
Return-Path: <tomh@thinlink.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F611207F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 6 Oct 2015 01:37:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com (mail-pa0-f52.google.com
[209.85.220.52])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B834411D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 6 Oct 2015 01:37:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by padhy16 with SMTP id hy16so52830008pad.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 05 Oct 2015 18:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=yTCTfPUbMJm0VXN1EbPrHuozVG3f60KEc37nPzPmZvE=;
b=aoTK3hVMohLa3gd7LjBEvdNsAAFehdkVp3VX8OKWe3O1usd7VQGVilnZOOYCcIO7RO
QWcFOElvOzYxj2cOCVf7Ep32SEe4pNYl+KssdvW9c8bgnc6DP+HKGcO8vwIyVK28pKUN
20JhTLs1yGRPsMXvy3Ciuf7BBbgizPCycqErC4+HO+hdvIKLwTWiXMErRUxyBZ/ea6rN
xl9R0SSpc+XovmISJ3JUr1dfgDFpbzQfP4dDDlbms+MGshZArlj+UZZ6Rt1GBq0LvyJK
B8mN97lZ28vAbscVTznRy/uwNneV5zULNW5W0xcrLH4tk4+S8qOMIAYKTYBCF5HKIHg+
pe0A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlP27Y5sLsw2crZ3ag+c4g7H2bcTHJzAY2GjMPQDNsTuf0v6Y8YPCYaeM//OpXSy2rrAZt0
X-Received: by 10.67.3.167 with SMTP id bx7mr43730308pad.47.1444095440461;
Mon, 05 Oct 2015 18:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.89] (99-8-65-117.lightspeed.davlca.sbcglobal.net.
[99.8.65.117]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
yg2sm29900463pbb.79.2015.10.05.18.37.19
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Mon, 05 Oct 2015 18:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <CAKzdR-rPoByn=+CgsTc1ZnLkjwtYyJnbQLbn-VHOvz0dLciefQ@mail.gmail.com>
<1489086.kGfJeeyi4a@garp>
<CAAS2fgSyWaRfXHKWZYzZ4X8ksMECaO47dTXum67XwpTTYnbDXg@mail.gmail.com>
<2081461.sDX5ARzIdv@garp>
<CAAS2fgSsJ10P7YYAAsV4P6no3pC=WYozWuN64u=WLSB3h6cHwA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <561325D4.5030800@thinlink.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 18:37:24 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgSsJ10P7YYAAsV4P6no3pC=WYozWuN64u=WLSB3h6cHwA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] This thread is not about the soft/hard fork
technical debate
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 01:37:21 -0000
On 10/5/2015 1:56 PM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> In this case, I don't even believe we have any regulator contributors
> that disagree.
Since Gavin Andresen chose you to be one of 4 people who decides whose
contributions are accepted to the Core project, shouldn't you recuse
yourself from referencing "regular contributor" as some kind of bar to
an opinion being worthy?
You don't want to be accused of squelching a person's opinions by
nacking or sitting on commits, then turning around and branding those
opinions as worthless because they are not from a "regular contributor."
Do you?
|
