1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
|
Return-Path: <elliot.olds@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AB3E826
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:11:01 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ig0-f178.google.com (mail-ig0-f178.google.com
[209.85.213.178])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C50C10E
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:11:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igui7 with SMTP id i7so740094igu.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=+vlV9nyY7aFQQoE68tnApVfXw7yZody72wUOvth/k68=;
b=HcT0xaol32dK8T0QNhR3SPVn2Irfc/+zXxLdFj/lZJH0cmIqJJZMaLBLLhxFyZ2oo1
KTpheuev6R6+oK1ZTAV9PkOi1T9oYeCHplGxR4DTUXNukwXNLe3iHVdptT7lZucwYsEW
958VCEPKecLXZKoW+sWf4G6lKqYDtYOQqxzA8F2yUGnMMslaTEoe7gaWRDQAVeSyGXla
N00S/tMOzGS3JiaPhsQGPjfosOGRCck+vPCwYG2WkttkMCvXkZUVkWUPT01tWXSFrMPX
B2p1ok++Jwj6fAKBY83A250/a4PQiCc9/K/588ZBY+N4wHTDQMLRInM6IilWMkuo6gPh
wKVw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.30.36 with SMTP id p4mr75908igh.87.1440105060489; Thu, 20
Aug 2015 14:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.79.97.135 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDosTUR0rt9ks2n9iEAoe0Z2L8OCQdcw7s39dQSuDG4=tg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABm2gDrfB+c1QTZippYYNX-uhcd9NYUcR-VHug6FYtPmSoz4Bw@mail.gmail.com>
<55CB2C57.1070307@mail.bihthai.net>
<CABm2gDp92omWk-eg5Sp8u4V8Z9hJcT_TcwyZyaw3Nm4ypLiWXQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDqH2V0D5XWco9AJ_WNcFUyjkaWGj_oonmKZRocqOvqYVw@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDosTUR0rt9ks2n9iEAoe0Z2L8OCQdcw7s39dQSuDG4=tg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:11:00 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+BnGuH8V7B+R4PONemjdjhmEpQB_yaNouGFMyAgauBFre8F7g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Elliot Olds <elliot.olds@gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd7526291dfae051dc49671
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] A summary list of all concerns related to not
rising the block size
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:11:01 -0000
--047d7bd7526291dfae051dc49671
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> To be clear, these two are just my personal lists of arguments on
> "each side" to clear my mind and try to be perfectly objective.
> [...]
> Here's the updated both-thread lists:
>
>
> http://0bin.net/paste/igHZMgeoIbYjCJd9#ovaOUlSAKvQYT2p3VXuIuUmNk2XyLH-Gnj=
R5NZMZgFb
I thought this was a good idea, so I turned my personal notes into a site
attempting to list all the strongest arguments and counterarguments on the
block size debate. I made mine a bit more detailed.
Here's the site: https://sites.google.com/site/bitcoinblocksizedebate/
Feedback welcome.
--047d7bd7526291dfae051dc49671
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On F=
ri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=
=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin=
-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex">To be clear, these two are just my personal lists of argument=
s on<br>
"each side" to clear my mind and try to be perfectly objective.<b=
r>[...]<br>Here's the updated both-thread lists:<br>
<br>
<a href=3D"http://0bin.net/paste/igHZMgeoIbYjCJd9#ovaOUlSAKvQYT2p3VXuIuUmNk=
2XyLH-GnjR5NZMZgFb" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://0bin.net/pa=
ste/igHZMgeoIbYjCJd9#ovaOUlSAKvQYT2p3VXuIuUmNk2XyLH-GnjR5NZMZgFb</a></block=
quote><div><br></div><div>I thought this was a good idea, so I turned my pe=
rsonal notes into a site attempting to list all the strongest arguments and=
counterarguments on the block size debate. I made mine a bit more detailed=
.=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div>Here's the site:=C2=A0<a href=3D"https=
://sites.google.com/site/bitcoinblocksizedebate/">https://sites.google.com/=
site/bitcoinblocksizedebate/</a></div><div><br></div><div>Feedback welcome.=
=C2=A0</div><div>=C2=A0</div></div></div></div>
--047d7bd7526291dfae051dc49671--
|
