1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <author@anonymousbitcoinbook.com>) id 1Wx3A3-0002Zt-K2
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:51:31 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of
anonymousbitcoinbook.com designates 69.89.25.95 as permitted
sender) client-ip=69.89.25.95;
envelope-from=author@anonymousbitcoinbook.com;
helo=gproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com;
Received: from gproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([69.89.25.95])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1Wx3A1-0001Ql-KA for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:51:31 +0000
Received: (qmail 8559 invoked by uid 0); 17 Jun 2014 23:24:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85)
by gproxy1.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 17 Jun 2014 23:24:44 -0000
Received: from just118.justhost.com ([173.254.28.118]) by cmgw4 with
id FbQd1o00m2Yu7hZ01bQggR; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 17:24:44 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=erRMkOZX c=1 sm=1 tr=0
a=iBV2HUWW4UcJ4JmVcQBhJA==:117 a=DZWVvRqoJ4pVHDilFU133g==:17
a=BY8XqHikAAAA:8
a=f5113yIGAAAA:8 a=IDi1JgSWSfwA:10 a=IfDVacecOmIA:10 a=S0JrtGnLqBcA:10
a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=iSdyhXBuAAAA:8 a=hMjYVLzx43kA:10 a=Y3P-G0aKTiQA:10
a=r7esRitPAAAA:8 a=ez_N6LibHCtwk9A1PYYA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10
a=D1euStFA17kA:10
Received: from [50.191.76.100] (port=58213 helo=[10.0.2.15])
by just118.justhost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <author@anonymousbitcoinbook.com>)
id 1Wx2k1-0004Za-JG for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 17 Jun 2014 17:24:37 -0600
Message-ID: <53A0CBF2.1050305@anonymousbitcoinbook.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:14:58 -0400
From: Kristov Atlas <author@anonymousbitcoinbook.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <8df74e1c1e6659c7a35bfaf1a4de7eae.squirrel@fruiteater.riseup.net>
<CAAS2fgSQB21gQHLZq9UdRYiRoiYqsB88yF8ViE2P8jK6ShrqLg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgSQB21gQHLZq9UdRYiRoiYqsB88yF8ViE2P8jK6ShrqLg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {7507:just118.justhost.com:stacksn1:anonymousbitcoinbook.com}
{sentby:smtp auth 50.191.76.100 authed with
author@anonymousbitcoinbook.com}
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [69.89.25.95 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1Wx3A1-0001Ql-KA
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] CoinJoin bounty fund question
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:51:31 -0000
On 06/17/2014 06:46 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> The correct place for more information is the Bitcointalk forum thread
> where it was announced:
> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=279249.0
Can anyone summarize the current status of the bounty? I see nothing
definite about the bounty in that thread from the beginning of January
2014, other than that the multisig address continues to accumulate
bitcoins. Meanwhile, on other mailing lists, I've seen some talk about
paying a portion or the whole of the bounty to the Dark Wallet team.
-Kristov
|
