1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31DEAA7C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 4 Sep 2017 18:42:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail149081.authsmtp.net (outmail149081.authsmtp.net
[62.13.149.81])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69D28127
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 4 Sep 2017 18:42:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c245.authsmtp.com (mail-c245.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.245])
by punt22.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id v84IgUSU051240;
Mon, 4 Sep 2017 19:42:30 +0100 (BST)
Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com
[52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id v84IgSAi044098
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Mon, 4 Sep 2017 19:42:29 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C8D164029C;
Mon, 4 Sep 2017 18:42:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 31C80224F4; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 10:10:17 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 10:10:17 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Greg Sanders <gsanders87@gmail.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <20170904141017.GG1276@fedora-23-dvm>
References: <CADabwBBrrPM2f9h_sgxY12tg=FUvKKCcnCC8ixnct93YL9uEFQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAB3F3DuK-5Bs-NunBVBnNbAT3SCVBZEqJqRHUHsSZhCVeO8xEQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CADabwBDQ=aJuW7fGcU2h-yYKxfj5A0Vx6DNHEM=_ppMrdA_mcw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAB3F3DtX2+awy71YPhMRjFRr4tvcGyq3Pu4997Sw2Jn_yAX+=g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GLp9dJVi+aaipsRk"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAB3F3DtX2+awy71YPhMRjFRr4tvcGyq3Pu4997Sw2Jn_yAX+=g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Server-Quench: ce554d07-91a0-11e7-801f-9cb654bb2504
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aQdMdgYUC1AEAgsB AmEbWl1eVF97WmM7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq
T0pMXVMcUg1seEti d0ceVh1yfg0If3Zw YwgxC3VeWBB6clt0
Qx9UCGwHMGB9YGAe Bl1RJFFSdQcYLB1A alQxNiYHcQ5VPz4z
GA41ejw8IwAXYg9S RxkXIEkJTEpBVj4x ThwPBy5nBlEfSiw2 RwAA
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1039:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] "Compressed" headers stream
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 18:42:34 -0000
--GLp9dJVi+aaipsRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 12:26:48PM -0400, Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev wrot=
e:
> Well, if anything my question may bolster your use-case. If there's a
> heavier chain that is invalid, I kind of doubt it matters for timestamping
> reasons.
Timestamping can easily be *more* vulnerable to malicious miners than finan=
cial
applications for a number of reasons, including the fact that there's no
financial feedback loop of miners destroying the value of the coins they
produce - timestamping is a non-financial piggy-back application that doesn=
't
directly interact with the Bitcoin economy, beyond a trival number of times=
tamp
transactions.
--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--GLp9dJVi+aaipsRk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJZrV7GAAoJECSBQD2l8JH7Zm0H/RWC+eDf2ODQcxtOzNgnU2cm
J/q3LIDaRO1Ac2Fr5q4XoDvD718PHSw99M7qvJyVfakjvMyrrkwdhpmFSPto16oS
1M9MeXe9GmqANZ99tNz6hcMV/5te/Gr7UuMXdXJ5GHZ/yiFm0efePynnL9Abcm3I
DpxWjr2iSDYrnBxHIUGCvwhaBXWfv0YlQGF5dxYpbi90IjnZJnbPSPdDMnRB0vzR
YWtfJ4FNlyRIpOZMz9F1XoxJaLap5qhced/cptnpoiP4EmgEsjyNthEZyWY65Pqi
P0zP8h6vL4A6yUMNDeSBQ9dFzypei0La4hYBcad+oohRodDWPBmCR8RgRtW6KcQ=
=2nCn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--GLp9dJVi+aaipsRk--
|
