1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
|
Return-Path: <btcdevml@tnull.de>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B945C002D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 10 Jun 2022 06:44:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3438419F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 10 Jun 2022 06:44:14 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id utUs850ZEoMG
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 10 Jun 2022 06:44:12 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from bebhionn.uberspace.de (bebhionn.uberspace.de [185.26.156.155])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46F5F84179
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 10 Jun 2022 06:44:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 1119 invoked by uid 989); 10 Jun 2022 06:44:10 -0000
Authentication-Results: bebhionn.uberspace.de;
auth=pass (plain)
From: Elias Rohrer <btcdevml@tnull.de>
To: alicexbt <alicexbt@protonmail.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 08:44:05 +0200
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5852)
Message-ID: <31411E6C-B1BF-45B7-848A-0AC8ECDFFCB3@tnull.de>
In-Reply-To: <dEY4dMW9awXrHkDOv-V7OSpjaPXHONVAaCSQ63gq1lQN0jWqJfeSoB4zlAwTn5I7J2L_YmzwcL_O6SbY9MBPnG845D8wmkauQzXeaD7VykA=@protonmail.com>
References: <dEY4dMW9awXrHkDOv-V7OSpjaPXHONVAaCSQ63gq1lQN0jWqJfeSoB4zlAwTn5I7J2L_YmzwcL_O6SbY9MBPnG845D8wmkauQzXeaD7VykA=@protonmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Rspamd-Bar: ---
X-Rspamd-Report: BAYES_HAM(-2.999999) MIME_GOOD(-0.1)
X-Rspamd-Score: -3.099999
Received: from unknown (HELO unkown) (::1)
by bebhionn.uberspace.de (Haraka/2.8.28) with ESMTPSA;
Fri, 10 Jun 2022 08:44:10 +0200
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 08:03:52 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BGP hijacking on Bitcoin p2p network
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 06:44:14 -0000
Hi alicexbt,
Routing attacks have actually been studied quite a bit in literature.
You may be interested in the research articles of Maria Apostolaki et al.=
[1,2], Muoi Tran et al.[3], and related works.
Best,
Elias
[1]: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.07524.pdf
[2]: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.06254.pdf
[3]: https://allquantor.at/blockchainbib/pdf/tran2020stealthier.pdf
On 9 Jun 2022, at 20:24, alicexbt via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Hi Bitcoin Developers,
>
> Based on this [answer][1] from 2014, bitcoin nodes are vulnerable to BG=
P hijacking. There was an incident in March 2022, twitter prefix was hija=
cked and details are shared in 2 blog posts:
>
> https://isc.sans.edu/diary/rss/28488
>
> https://www.manrs.org/2022/03/lesson-learned-twitter-shored-up-its-rout=
ing-security/
>
> 'nusenu' had written an article about Tor network being vulnerable to B=
GP hijacking attacks: https://nusenu.medium.com/how-vulnerable-is-the-tor=
-network-to-bgp-hijacking-attacks-56d3b2ebfd92
>
> After doing some research I found that RPKI ROA and BGP prefix length c=
an help against BGP hijacking attacks. I checked BGP prefix length and RP=
KI ROA for first 10 IP addresses returned in `getnodeaddresses` in bitcoi=
n core and it had vulnerable results.
>
> https://i.stack.imgur.com/KD7jH.png
>
> Has anyone written a detailed blog post or research article like nusenu=
? If not I would be interested to write one in next couple of weeks?
> Looking for some "technical" feedback, links if this was already discus=
sed in past with some solutions.
>
> =C2=A0 [1]: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/a/30305/133407
>
>
> /dev/fd0
>
> Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
|
