1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
|
Return-Path: <eric@voskuil.org>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CEC4C002D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 10 Oct 2022 22:05:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4716818DC
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 10 Oct 2022 22:05:40 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org D4716818DC
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=voskuil-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com
header.i=@voskuil-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.a=rsa-sha256
header.s=20210112 header.b=WQo3YaIK
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 8irvrS8EPZhe
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 10 Oct 2022 22:05:40 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org E3A45814B8
Received: from mail-pg1-x535.google.com (mail-pg1-x535.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::535])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3A45814B8
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 10 Oct 2022 22:05:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pg1-x535.google.com with SMTP id u71so3788585pgd.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 10 Oct 2022 15:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=voskuil-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112;
h=thread-index:content-language:content-transfer-encoding
:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:in-reply-to:references:cc:to
:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=EAxb9GKey0H0/0MiApSzJr9VnqrxEGadxNAiQ0DjIr4=;
b=WQo3YaIK999+v51UmeW2dKQeJepupw447EFT68xGu7Y4NuwrjeUXr1WFaSbTtbq3ED
lnuuyjYoLjJ3UE94U226H/iPF7vXXpXHvCiFDD1XonOSOrJpYKhRKVgARvAId5KOS222
rBkN+yO8JYRQ4DPNp/OZ94Pc0KVJSwRD+9HnM8IwQsAolYxW50z9GsiX41SgQEpJ0iAo
ZYvIZMpZr9shkqLnLgF6Fgp4UlRB8KhbkFnUPv9X4FeDLo1j26lh2LXr7AQnm4w+gk2G
ShGMx0srGByBg5GgANGgdbsy/3pcBA23ToI6kFVAMtIXNeu3QNjaekUE32HjzfiFTB+9
nQsg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=thread-index:content-language:content-transfer-encoding
:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:in-reply-to:references:cc:to
:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=EAxb9GKey0H0/0MiApSzJr9VnqrxEGadxNAiQ0DjIr4=;
b=mYJtO1Du/mD0+5CqX5RUHx2Enxl/PsC0iTqDC56HpsWMXVfbkqkkBtoXlTnSSpNUa7
+BsN8rylRTHMHl4nQQQz76DBtVQNlGjuPz9XnP28XzvWIjBDEKL5TUPUTAvN1XTmdnxe
UxqHeKIDOUScZIdiHhXyyau8MBnw5bbo1Ha/eP2JphbA6gu98eLHsLDiJtpBQ2+BdWq1
1XePcvsngFq3AQPVRuLnE/UDBC9HOK4tKGD+x/NBdAXMq0js25/389ELWXBgsab7uozK
SugmK43ckarJnIJzIIEFi4F/whStNkz+O0m6b1gw/CCgDpL/7xzzA5gDGDeHITAycDkL
EL3w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2/P3kcp8liqpXMbVAC0BIJKFnmBsiECWynQgBWBM8Y6DH4A/ty
BZ6PXwa5XUF+nSJ3PJ7ezDUvzw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7rfh80GqBLZry3eKKOEoHMGEIi+z1TSWziKM8v3nfSrBCF0Bp4DkGP8VuBsOyVvL//F/Yldw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2316:b0:548:58b6:b17c with SMTP id
h22-20020a056a00231600b0054858b6b17cmr22049849pfh.53.1665439539153;
Mon, 10 Oct 2022 15:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ERICDESKTOP ([50.35.79.94]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
y24-20020a634b18000000b004603e7788dcsm4509148pga.77.2022.10.10.15.05.38
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Mon, 10 Oct 2022 15:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: <eric@voskuil.org>
To: "'Anthony Towns'" <aj@erisian.com.au>
References: <03ca01d8d8fb$1558ed50$400ac7f0$@voskuil.org>
<040f01d8d93c$a58c2540$f0a46fc0$@voskuil.org>
<Yz/Hy39ablXUdmH+@erisian.com.au>
<069201d8db50$59a98c60$0cfca520$@voskuil.org>
<Y0JhqlNxUqVXQfpB@erisian.com.au>
<008301d8dbac$c28280a0$478781e0$@voskuil.org>
<Y0LMTtOYdNjzJ1MN@erisian.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <Y0LMTtOYdNjzJ1MN@erisian.com.au>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 15:05:38 -0700
Message-ID: <009a01d8dcf4$6e913290$4bb397b0$@voskuil.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-Index: AQGjJkZ87zZ0BUhtE3y1t2YHVdIMmQLud6c7AVI9RdsCSqBKvwK1YZmRAZbUfhwCMCW1Da4LXkmw
Cc: 'Bitcoin Protocol Discussion' <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Packaged Transaction Relay
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 22:05:41 -0000
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
> Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Packaged Transaction Relay
> > > > > > Protocol cannot be defined on an ad-hoc basis as a "courtesy"
> > > > > BIPs are a courtesy in the first place.
> > > > I suppose if you felt that you were the authority then this would
> > > > be your perspective.
> > > You seem to think that I'm arguing courtesy is not a good thing, or
> > > that we couldn't use more of it?
> > That is neither what I said nor implied. You were clearly dismissing
> > the public process, not advocating for politeness.
>
> And that is neither what I said nor implied, nor something I believe. If
you
> think courtesy is something that can be ignored in a public process, I
don't
> think you should expect much success.
"BIPs are a courtesy in the first place."
> If you'd like to actually participate in public standards development,
please
> feel free to make some technical comments on my proposals, or others, or
> make your own proposal, either here or on github, or heck, anywhere else.
"RE: [bitcoin-dev] Packaged Transaction Relay"
> I mean, that's what I'd suggest anyway; I'm not your boss. I promise to at
> least be entertainingly surprised if you make any progress with your
current
> approach though.
Grow up Anthony.
e
|
