1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
|
Return-Path: <tomh@thinlink.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCA9B8EA
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 23:16:39 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com (mail-pa0-f52.google.com
[209.85.220.52])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 704C3115
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 23:16:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by padfo6 with SMTP id fo6so16393617pad.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:16:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date
:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=u9Np8NVzH/apEbXJkkhjQeFXTwHOFiVDUkCkiAIQuRM=;
b=jRvBndFi9I8KWzOPyB7WmYoKqtdmOY1ALUGJDU2QJ39f6nrITaeUucQ35vmwM12Rq0
Z5uIkMcNEgLUnqlgSTrtkajwFaU0gwRlUif4MCK2NbxCpqUDIlWkFcLKi9ZaNwPpJqto
VQEMfnORa0bI9gmBw8urgTuhYLFGKV0SMg9ZhUUAJHuDqwXGygpUrTy7i0d/c9qLH/uJ
I79+KGxjVYtfBGNppFivlSlqt7wU9FgsdvQw70jY49/xLdfpm0rWIGbFwmHoD5fMRPMF
+bbXKUNy1R53R2vWTUhueq0ZcnR9B7T+j1KbsiqUD0XB1fyJNcR947zncYGydCxShQFS
AEwA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkBDvy8MUAgLAR2yHFfj6LBQjAJ73KmLkcRlja+gZOu+2Cddn1+OnCaP8ilufAiyjfd5Ytp
X-Received: by 10.66.161.232 with SMTP id xv8mr21705082pab.137.1440198999179;
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:16:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.89] (99-8-65-117.lightspeed.davlca.sbcglobal.net.
[99.8.65.117]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
hh3sm9003066pbc.8.2015.08.21.16.16.37
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
References: <CAED3CWgTOMFgaM6bBfU0Dn-R0NrdrhGAQo34wHEneYkTtB4Opg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAEieSeSw04FYCCa-Df+V6BgJo1RHqPvJWt9t=c-JCC=dnhraWA@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDp0o5DBzuoyZ=SFvnBXTwPYFWhdOqUPkP_M_3koNMVP1g@mail.gmail.com>
<55D5AA8E.7070403@bitcoins.info> <55D67017.9000106@thinlink.com>
<20150821003751.GA19230@muck> <55D7575B.6030505@thinlink.com>
<20150821222153.GD7450@muck>
From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1010
Message-ID: <55D7B157.904@thinlink.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:16:39 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150821222153.GD7450@muck>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 23:16:39 -0000
On 8/21/2015 3:21 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
> To use a car analogy, Pieter Wuille has shown that the brake cylinders
> have a fatigue problem, and if used in stop-and-go traffic regularly
> they'll fail during heavy braking, potentially killing someone. You've
> countered with a study of highway driving, showing that if the car is
> only used on the highway the brakes have no issues, claiming that the
> car design is perfectly safe.
No. If we must play the analogy game, it was found that the car crashes
when the brakes are bad (minority hash power partitioned) the radio is
on (partitioned miners had small individual hashrate).
I checked the scenario where only the radio is on, and found the car
does not crash.
|
