1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB859847
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 22 Aug 2015 06:26:48 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail149082.authsmtp.co.uk (outmail149082.authsmtp.co.uk
[62.13.149.82])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D4A106
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 22 Aug 2015 06:26:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235])
by punt16.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t7M6Qj3L016407;
Sat, 22 Aug 2015 07:26:45 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [25.83.116.0] ([24.114.26.110]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t7M6Qcl0041548
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Sat, 22 Aug 2015 07:26:41 +0100 (BST)
In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDrH=Kz1rnrD=T-L81vNr1+gjRe1qcHxj2KQvw6-RWc9CA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAED3CWgTOMFgaM6bBfU0Dn-R0NrdrhGAQo34wHEneYkTtB4Opg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAEieSeSw04FYCCa-Df+V6BgJo1RHqPvJWt9t=c-JCC=dnhraWA@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDp0o5DBzuoyZ=SFvnBXTwPYFWhdOqUPkP_M_3koNMVP1g@mail.gmail.com>
<55D5AA8E.7070403@bitcoins.info>
<55D67017.9000106@thinlink.com> <20150821003751.GA19230@muck>
<55D7575B.6030505@thinlink.com> <20150821222153.GD7450@muck>
<55D7B157.904@thinlink.com> <20150822000127.GA5679@muck>
<CABm2gDrH=Kz1rnrD=T-L81vNr1+gjRe1qcHxj2KQvw6-RWc9CA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=UTF-8
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 06:26:32 +0000
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Tim=F3n?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Message-ID: <F4DDE65C-19D1-4C32-8BF2-A27572CF350D@petertodd.org>
X-Server-Quench: c21bb52c-4896-11e5-b398-002590a15da7
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aQdMdAAUGUATAgsB AmMbW1NeUlt7XWc7 aQ5PbARZfEhIQQRr
UFdNRFdNFUssBmEH Z01CUhl2dgBCcDB1 YkZhECNZXRYocEQu
X0pcHGsbZGY1bX1N U0lQagNUcgZDfk5E bwQuUz1vNG8XDSg5
AwQ0PjZ0MThBHWx5 UwcEKFMZSEIPD3YX QBYeBzIrGUAJDw8y
MxchK1hUNkIWOUZ6 ClozVBo9Og9aIQRG dwAA
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 24.114.26.110/465
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
URIBL_BLACK autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 06:26:48 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 21 August 2015 20:21:22 GMT-07:00, "Jorge Timón" <jtimon@jtimon.cc> wrote:
>Don't you mean profits instead of revenue?
Actually no. I thought revenue would be a less subjective question to ask, with more focus on the underlying orphan rate question; part of the answer might include an assumed profit margin.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQE9BAEBCgAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJV2BYO
AAoJEMCF8hzn9Lncz4MH/3Z+n1sWPIBSjRebDdZdiFZvJhOYknpE9fzHo2zv6euY
qDkQS5uAXbFroF2jrm41H3hjtDXcy0mBIgxhhYMesia8ck9jXb2mXuUlnltBNzgK
XeNEWgie1Y2kvXkeq1pXgPLtWWi9W54kQQ9IrpoMpasBMmP8UHh5WuzSqrWFP8Ha
HD8smRbByhc6ydEHbVE8FaYxg9ijBIM1e0sh3W+QPgRG8ATAaH6UVJu01YkKHtwS
V7PLW0m8WAEH+DAMV54Wgzm6prreQGy3KmldHDF58iMLzescdDIc0Pvotw613rvz
06KgQkQ20ba75XeJQOqXBygGoYS3qHOa9XwVyYq1S7g=
=elAX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
