1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
|
Return-Path: <hampus.sjoberg@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E08C0978
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:21:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-qk0-f172.google.com (mail-qk0-f172.google.com
[209.85.220.172])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 829C416F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:21:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qk0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 11so90022231qkl.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 13 Feb 2017 03:21:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=G85syKrcbwE10SooWy0qTSmXhiCHDYaD3J1D0v2PPhs=;
b=Yh+MdkVUIpk9JOgYayugyj/To85Ppo9ms1IOek4GBiwgwvNBM9byvh0gL8bByd9JJB
Z5BCTHvOwnRVWIXaRIZA0gF9hUJmjxkihXaRnJ2xsy1iV8XHxqNFnyd1te6ETNB2l+bH
lrH20lLLg8OE4Bmdxjq1Mc1oS1abNHx/v/XDmSWwMcRyuOrUSB+Lym6AKV32kSJDFP9X
DcDgq2X674m46xnMBZx6K839wrf7hPjE6tUza3/4ArwMIySfW2Yruztd14U0hN9rf7d2
cTo2QJq7iC7UhJBS3qPRp4hBU3EflERM11diU5DEWVh/7Zomut9x622dncH8hNFvJ7Ty
NCew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=G85syKrcbwE10SooWy0qTSmXhiCHDYaD3J1D0v2PPhs=;
b=Z6UjRsgqmgT5ZeXYmVtUR0i5EExWzkL9Fn7wcQ8SCrnzbkvCsAJyFt/Edvlh2jbrQK
JOd7F8GuLRV8lsrjtJpta1hnczTcWmIhL5drLhsBkgY+jeSVx5+KoR3ivKlRK+ncaaGi
Er8z8sMmQEapyfWXbsb4uTE9XCWnqQhEcZx5OwYeN0SAcrEWB9YyLmM4pjj9xE4K2MKY
d7LtwalIS1iGcBntil4+n//JN4oT0Nqg0AbTd4XvpPBfvJREq9GO1a7EdSiyOTe9TJST
0zRl2RYMVnrm3pEIsxqX88dhHj31y60u6Xu3dhcE5gPuCiNxYLESSpGn008ymnvYvFMk
ETNw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mzNsUsN9Pl+1dLVdTmdABAzqALlKbEG9e8mN85Z9oYvt0FhfdIYHA7u+/3w4tB6sWuRvDq+HXSz0DXAg==
X-Received: by 10.55.80.214 with SMTP id e205mr20438181qkb.60.1486984904714;
Mon, 13 Feb 2017 03:21:44 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.237.57.136 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 03:21:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201701022119.11115.luke@dashjr.org>
References: <CAGCNRJoN7u3yvzitH2KSmVty-p0tX9jxWLHPb8uO5CPZmxmoRg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAGCNRJp71NCxQ3jk4hu-kXF94RiqfeD=AVnxR37TrJ7bDG310w@mail.gmail.com>
<1944321.hguq3JoYe1@cherry> <201701022119.11115.luke@dashjr.org>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Hampus_Sj=C3=B6berg?= <hampus.sjoberg@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 12:21:44 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFMkqK_hKFZc0bnO17ONpM1v5D2nDgu5-u5MTByJF0xEYZ3tAQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114a7f8a083207054867a767
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:48:15 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP - 'Block75' - New algorithm
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:21:46 -0000
--001a114a7f8a083207054867a767
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> It gives miners complete control over the limit. They can make blocks of
any size (within the current limit), thus triggering the conditions by
which your proposal would raise the limit further.
There might be a long term incentive to keep increasing the blocksize, to
further centralize the network (and kick smaller miners out), but it comes
with the cost of losing out on transaction fees.
Miners have always needed to plan for the short term, I see no rational
scenario where miners would spam their blocks with their own transactions
(or low fee transactions) to keep increasing the blocksize limit.
Hampus
--001a114a7f8a083207054867a767
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div><div>> It gives miners complete control over =
the limit. They can make blocks of any size (within the current limit), thu=
s triggering the conditions by which your proposal would raise the limit fu=
rther.<br><br></div>There might be a long term incentive to keep increasing=
the blocksize, to further centralize the network (and kick smaller miners =
out), but it comes with the cost of losing out on transaction fees.<br></di=
v>Miners have always needed to plan for the short term, I see no rational s=
cenario where miners would spam their blocks with their own transactions (o=
r low fee transactions) to keep increasing the blocksize limit.<br><br></di=
v>Hampus<br></div>
--001a114a7f8a083207054867a767--
|
