1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
|
Return-Path: <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C05AECD9
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 26 Feb 2016 23:23:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-io0-f171.google.com (mail-io0-f171.google.com
[209.85.223.171])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FBAFEC
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 26 Feb 2016 23:23:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-io0-f171.google.com with SMTP id z135so138260161iof.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 26 Feb 2016 15:23:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
:from:to; bh=izEvpn1ESo78D5X6mQeQ9mFg4QcNrdTGmcGP9HEbv4c=;
b=z3pBPmq0b+hHpjbfXBABg6pff4cClJ+PJzV23/BRpHJKtDhN0JtwMjVJ3GQxBoICtS
AhdDiL8UwpidKfYaQ6uvsLAAHAeY1Oc1LTWxiMBZfhzXMylbprqPdt5qLeCWN7/fsJwJ
Wm2FSeEdebAaGC5QPXWtBjegMSIkHsL8AGLJ0bUCMTVOiRQl4BEvvtxykIPFGrK64Io+
3X+0MgKq1ljVR0ac6UJgFwHR8b5zimIKUc6frslztKmTa7CH+t7u3tVyBK3kTMR2rLcH
aCxmAnzigy0V75uvXl1d5aEUcy0KA4iYE2Wzaj29ZECQmvftqNI0wnjV0JyKCWr2e+iY
LIIA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to;
bh=izEvpn1ESo78D5X6mQeQ9mFg4QcNrdTGmcGP9HEbv4c=;
b=l7Gb+e4By0Bqkdw5fldGwtyoQVYYplSm6FyEOC0aTcfGNWh3vAIr7N8lROik+wBPRE
uarQYSMF0rSrXiK3P9B0zRjo2bt8dXyCA8zUp0ovRsjtvAJW+uOnD57enBtq+o/HmIEC
cLwFJ/IM/FDgAd3JKF8tTbBSYMEmFA3cxF1YIDSaccmssv91b0GNBI0KQi5sIhCx/pTo
8iqfY0JG6gcxDDt4qDAA++HysM/EdHIVeFCnSB34f2H+O68bSnoe2uA8t3alyVjSWxoP
F4MbsCENbckQYL6fhJ9O96lu8KnCLQw2WLBiZnMZtoSQhZ4loIKLFUWixipYCdnQIxN3
tUNw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTdfQWZ+F6JdalHOt9HwgF6T3DVyohcfFkqqrtEMP1QElIkTwMVZpOW/uBERcWe+tTLkLC8KsInwOOplw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.14.66 with SMTP id 63mr11112351ioo.150.1456528989900;
Fri, 26 Feb 2016 15:23:09 -0800 (PST)
Sender: gmaxwell@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.132.75 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 15:23:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgT8RE7w87Yv9Be7arH-xGCtwcq0Ynbk21ZVpqJZrEN5EQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAS2fgRtxpg55XaM2qpgevtfdhvtnakdKhY2WgpGXgsZqVm=Gg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKzdR-rp0Bqkj3PLWHx4etHejy2C997M3fGJy702jPdVThxPZg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgT8RE7w87Yv9Be7arH-xGCtwcq0Ynbk21ZVpqJZrEN5EQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 23:23:09 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: UUH3S254U3GOns4MZyyes7akKEM
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgTLE6SH1wa_0orfuYoPeu5pasumbTW446KAyGwDaGEcHA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Fwd: The first successful Zero-Knowledge Contingent
Payment
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 23:23:10 -0000
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Sergio Demian Lerner
<sergio.d.lerner@gmail.com> wrote:
> Congratulations!
>
> It a property of the SKCP system that the person who performed the trusted
> setup cannot extract any information from a proof?
>
> In other words, is it proven hard to obtain information from a proof by the
> buyer?
Yes, the secrecy is information theoretic (assuming no implementation
bugs); beyond the truth of the outcome. This holds even if the
initialization is malicious.
The soundness of this scheme is computational-- we're trusting a deep
stack of cryptographic assumptions that the proofs cannot be forged.
|
