summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/71/a91b9904e0f8ae8e92b9ae939dbf26bb70765e
blob: 37cbc41509a862500979b56fdd58695a150f9ab7 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23C1FDC0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu,  3 Sep 2015 17:53:03 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail148154.authsmtp.co.uk (outmail148154.authsmtp.co.uk
	[62.13.148.154])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756D8A8
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu,  3 Sep 2015 17:53:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237])
	by punt15.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t83Hr0lg093633;
	Thu, 3 Sep 2015 18:53:00 +0100 (BST)
Received: from muck (cpe-24-164-134-182.nyc.res.rr.com [24.164.134.182])
	(authenticated bits=128)
	by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t83Hqt9T049782
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
	Thu, 3 Sep 2015 18:52:58 +0100 (BST)
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 13:52:55 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150903175255.GB9647@muck>
References: <CADm_WcZyK6LUcuKqSEuR-q0hTZOC3EdJsqY1HrS_ow0knDY=7A@mail.gmail.com>
	<e54e93e519d776262f9c0f4ae23f54fb@xbt.hk>
	<CAE-z3OVd6+ncvJBwusSbcMTG6xaRxsboH3ru_zQXpbu2wW_Zng@mail.gmail.com>
	<301aa5f682f8aa408b9f6f4618095fe2@xbt.hk>
	<CADm_WcaJYogJWeQ0kkADgYMS7=H9f60Y4thr_XT-thROyYfg2w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADJgMzuTJZxj7BWoEKD51OM=V200EfEimWM2Tkix7+zkCWcE0w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="K8nIJk4ghYZn606h"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADJgMzuTJZxj7BWoEKD51OM=V200EfEimWM2Tkix7+zkCWcE0w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Server-Quench: 9cdbbbc7-5264-11e5-9f76-002590a135d3
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
	http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
	aQdMdgEUC1AEAgsB AmMbWlxeVV97XGs7 aQ5PbANZfEtNWxtr
	WEpWR1pVCwQmRRQC fl9aW31ycwxBcHw+ Y09nWT5SDxAoJxQu
	RVNRF2sCeGZhPWUC WRZfcR5UcAFPdx8U a1N6AHBDAzANdhEy
	HhM4ODE3eDlSNhEd aCA1ZQtKGQ4QBjM3 Rh4DFjwzHEoDLwAA 
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 24.164.134.182/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
	anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 100 specification
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 17:53:03 -0000


--K8nIJk4ghYZn606h
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 06:32:09PM +0100, Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Just use a 4-byte unsigned integer where the integer is the size in
> bytes. It's concise and less complex (and less complex to implement).
> There's no need for human readable strings here.

Solid NACK on making string parsers part of the consensus critical
codebase. (WTF=E2=80=BD)

--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000000c69430beea18c71be1d34114d7e1d4023dd1ffe1d9bc7f0

--K8nIJk4ghYZn606h
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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==
=Wded
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--K8nIJk4ghYZn606h--