1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
|
Return-Path: <leohaf@orangepill.ovh>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DDFC0032
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 23 Oct 2023 15:05:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D69282540
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 23 Oct 2023 15:05:49 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 7D69282540
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key,
unprotected) header.d=orangepill.ovh header.i=@orangepill.ovh
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=sig1 header.b=M7V2hLaR
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.796
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id QwrEyPFKNhtj
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 23 Oct 2023 15:05:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 476 seconds by postgrey-1.37 at util1.osuosl.org;
Mon, 23 Oct 2023 15:05:44 UTC
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org EC0A08133F
Received: from qs51p00im-qukt01080502.me.com (qs51p00im-qukt01080502.me.com
[17.57.155.23])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC0A08133F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 23 Oct 2023 15:05:44 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orangepill.ovh;
s=sig1; t=1698073065;
bh=ZjxRyjm2QuU7C0zbh5YGJGNWpfxAogx+DuG2Ml4B7WU=;
h=Content-Type:From:Mime-Version:Subject:Message-Id:Date:To;
b=M7V2hLaR26NTrWwwuKU+UPkUfsGY++nWZK5JXcFnz/wY44UXqxLFa/7EfvDP4OQEK
ep68EKm6mTakIgRYtGu13ZYmsac9bbCGrecrSj8Pb1AQ/jUp1HvHKf8OS6NMVNuGp6
V8qG85COfoCtitX6YqQknc0OVU4A8UfL6G5kteSohvoYPtUCltru6/ZPTFMOjc6Hx3
FSRCW1C1svs3NIqxOxLTKm2Cn9ZtrHjoQXhvZNKCA14LbgUwoYT4sd83xSyvy/GWY4
N8gPOTjH4rlzJ07nccC4edpxs1uaKKlw+zhxGt8rTQVFItXuZ/s6hEn66KEL4vxhNU
9wBjkBa9DLTIg==
Received: from smtpclient.apple (qs51p00im-dlb-asmtp-mailmevip.me.com
[17.57.155.28])
by qs51p00im-qukt01080502.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E9BD24E40247;
Mon, 23 Oct 2023 14:57:44 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=Apple-Mail-A645869C-59A4-41B5-BD15-124082163A23
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=A9o_Haf?= <leohaf@orangepill.ovh>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Message-Id: <C61E710C-772F-4473-8FF2-38A47AC0D333@orangepill.ovh>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 16:57:32 +0200
To: Casey Rodarmor <casey@rodarmor.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (21A360)
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: Lg8VVPNhn9WMSoURnJ2JWS-4kAePHrpU
X-Proofpoint-GUID: Lg8VVPNhn9WMSoURnJ2JWS-4kAePHrpU
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: =?UTF-8?Q?vendor=3Dfsecure_engine=3D1.1.170-22c6f66c430a71ce266a39bfe25bc?=
=?UTF-8?Q?2903e8d5c8f:6.0.138,18.0.790,17.0.605.474.0000000_definitions?=
=?UTF-8?Q?=3D2022-01-12=5F02:2020-02-14=5F02,2022-01-12=5F02,2020-01-23?=
=?UTF-8?Q?=5F02_signatures=3D0?=
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 malwarescore=0
phishscore=0 spamscore=0
mlxscore=0 clxscore=1030 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0
bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1
engine=8.12.0-2212070000 definitions=main-2310230130
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 16:49:28 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinals BIP PR
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 15:05:49 -0000
--Apple-Mail-A645869C-59A4-41B5-BD15-124082163A23
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=EF=BB=BF BIPs such as the increase in block size, drives-chains, colored co=
ins, etc... were proposals for Bitcoin improvements. On the other hand, your=
BIP brings absolutely no improvement, on the contrary it is a regression, b=
ut you already know that.
I strongly invite you to retract or if the desire continues to push you to n=
egatively affect the chain, to create OIPs or anything similar, as far as po=
ssible from the development of Bitcoin and real BIPs that improve Bitcoin.
L=C3=A9o Haf.=20
> Le 23 oct. 2023 =C3=A0 10:23, Casey Rodarmor via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@=
lists.linuxfoundation.org> a =C3=A9crit :
> =EF=BB=BF
> Dear List,
>=20
> The Ordinals BIP PR has been sitting open for nine months now[0]. I've com=
mented a few times asking the BIP editors to let me know what is needed for t=
he BIP to either be merged or rejected. I've also reached out to the BIP edi=
tors via DM and email, but haven't received a response.
>=20
> There has been much misunderstanding of the nature of the BIP process. BIP=
S, in particular informational BIPs, are a form of technical documentation, a=
nd their acceptance does not indicate that they will be included in any impl=
ementation, including Bitcoin Core, nor that they they have consensus among t=
he community.
>=20
> Preexisting BIPs include hard-fork block size increases, hard-fork proof-o=
f-work changes, colored coin voting protocols, rejected soft fork proposals,=
encouragement of address reuse, and drivechain.
>=20
> I believe ordinals is in-scope for a BIP, and am hoping to get the PR unst=
uck. I would appreciate feedback from the BIP editors on whether it is in-sc=
ope for a BIP, if not, why not, and if so, what changes need to be made for i=
t to be accepted.
>=20
> Best regards,
> Casey Rodarmor
>=20
> [0] https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1408
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
--Apple-Mail-A645869C-59A4-41B5-BD15-124082163A23
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3D=
utf-8"></head><body dir=3D"auto"><div dir=3D"ltr">=EF=BB=BF BIPs such a=
s the increase in block size, drives-chains, colored coins, etc... were prop=
osals for Bitcoin improvements. On the other hand, your BIP brings absolutel=
y no improvement, on the contrary it is a regression, but you already know t=
hat.<div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">I strongly invite you to ret=
ract or if the desire continues to push you to negatively affect the chain, t=
o create OIPs or anything similar, as far as possible from the development o=
f Bitcoin and real BIPs that improve Bitcoin.</div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></di=
v><div dir=3D"ltr">L=C3=A9o Haf. </div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div dir=3D=
"ltr"></div><blockquote type=3D"cite">Le 23 oct. 2023 =C3=A0 10:23, Casey Ro=
darmor via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> a =C3=A9=
crit :<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div dir=3D"=
ltr">=EF=BB=BF<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-fa=
mily:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">Dear List,<br></div><div class=3D"gmail_def=
ault" style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><br></div><div class=3D=
"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">The Ordinal=
s BIP PR has been sitting open for nine months now[0]. I've commented a few t=
imes asking the BIP editors to let me know what is needed for the BIP to eit=
her be merged or rejected. I've also reached out to the BIP editors via DM a=
nd email, but haven't received a response.</div><div class=3D"gmail_default"=
style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><br></div><div class=3D"gm=
ail_default" style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">There has been=
much misunderstanding of the nature of the BIP process. BIPS, in particular=
informational BIPs, are a form of technical documentation, and their accept=
ance does not indicate that they will be included in any implementation, inc=
luding Bitcoin Core, nor that they they have consensus among the community.<=
/div><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-=
serif"><br>Preexisting BIPs include hard-fork block size increases, hard-for=
k proof-of-work changes, colored coin voting protocols, rejected soft fork p=
roposals, encouragement of address reuse, and drivechain.</div><div class=3D=
"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><br></div><=
div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"=
>I believe ordinals is in-scope for a BIP, and am hoping to get the PR unstu=
ck. I would appreciate feedback from the BIP editors on whether it is in-sco=
pe for a BIP, if not, why not, and if so, what changes need to be made for i=
t to be accepted.</div><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:ari=
al,helvetica,sans-serif"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"fon=
t-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">Best regards,</div><div class=3D"gmail_=
default" style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">Casey Rodarmor<br>=
<br>[0] <a href=3D"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1408">https://github=
.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1408</a><br></div></div>
<span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>bitcoi=
n-dev mailing list</span><br><span>bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</sp=
an><br><span>https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev<=
/span><br></div></blockquote></div></body></html>=
--Apple-Mail-A645869C-59A4-41B5-BD15-124082163A23--
|
