1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
|
Return-Path: <elombrozo@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B645279
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:28:30 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pd0-f182.google.com (mail-pd0-f182.google.com
[209.85.192.182])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89CEC13E
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:28:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pdbnt7 with SMTP id nt7so4966985pdb.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
:message-id:references:to;
bh=prZvXhFLvGjjTDxZF8QmFHTlrPf6OBHUXbWLV4w2n7Y=;
b=0HZbfR4pEmZaoZgs/8FCx7ljdC7ptAB7YFilra10BDDwWo1kOQUtUW/vaz+QY37Bzv
TsA7erkWwQGM623ZwLSO3DYGn7B4Xvx7aQX/gOd+kYCiLYecR2+7iItFKEs3/JmHpeGh
GCMcp1+WA6OMPmYsP0PHpLwWjwlHppv6S9mSlWl7pa3EKYYzxqd2SWRjQ4X1/NqKVxj5
nQStzlp1JIFWKpxgycs/rrrA2h9e464Bno9cDxsDIt54hxhss3cLPDT71VVQlN8AOzwH
2cdZXoctoZAFms+iJeyKxYH0Q9fwJR8RuZcgC8/5sY+8O6fJg87bp89eX5ME4mgQOFER
++9Q==
X-Received: by 10.66.119.105 with SMTP id kt9mr25386927pab.86.1437701309152;
Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.107] (cpe-76-167-237-202.san.res.rr.com.
[76.167.237.202]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
xo14sm11235957pac.24.2015.07.23.18.28.26
(version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_7D23AA7C-B4C7-477B-AF76-01C7FAF66B10";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b6
From: Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D7EE14EC-B36D-43F2-8CEC-B63443FBBCA8@me.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:28:25 -0700
Message-Id: <0E15E07E-E21C-4541-869A-3C34CBA35774@gmail.com>
References: <CAPg+sBgs-ouEMu=LOVCmOyCGwfM1Ygxooz0shyvAuHDGGZYfJw@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDq3JyZx0QCRDbcNSLSOBKdpi4h_7VN1XL8N42U38+eBAA@mail.gmail.com>
<55B113AF.40500@thinlink.com>
<CABsx9T1MTc-GmuQyFN1vaFK=CDWV_L214Pi9nR6jLMouQQD0fw@mail.gmail.com>
<C5A70F53-4779-457A-A06A-686877706F89@gmail.com>
<CADL_X_exckh5T2BfzPEp26fPR3TD69QarwroDEdS_9wtnKbf+g@mail.gmail.com>
<6F436293-9E2B-461C-B105-FC4CF9EBFC69@gmail.com>
<CADL_X_fs3-Zj-9nHu5HXCS=kNFUTJkrUR_8SL+d+M4ziwB66Jw@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDqFe+_g5Mk=tXCD94x74pu6SiL+XHhMM-T3bBw78m3Mow@mail.gmail.com>
<D161F6BB-BFB1-4B9F-B024-D60A170F393C@gmail.com>
<CALqmWPC8PdSPS3chhnjBaTixrvvg0VrEaXzd3OvbXifkMs0DUw@mail.gmail.com>
<42BF7FEB-320F-43BE-B3D9-1D76CB8B9975@gmai> <l.com@mac.com>
<D472C05D-7164-4ED1-B571-94415AD8E60F@gmail.com>
<346D4CE0-E00D-4ABB-B131-EFA1416CB20C@me.com>
<29363BE6-72A7-4D06-A974-C52BA12FD8BD@gmail.com>
<55FFBC8F-A3C9-4109-89C7-AC359FBBD478@me.com>
<4734381C-2000-4D9B-9099-DDE3D38D64A3@me.com>
<DEF9C610-2FBC-40C1-9AFA-9E91903C7F96@petertodd.org>
<DFA3CCE4-52F7-4D63-8982-2EB133AB6EAA@me.com>
<B8F9DE4B-A8AA-490D-991B-11C28B2AA527@gmail.com>
<D7EE14EC-B36D-43F2-8CEC-B63443FBBCA8@me.com>
To: Jean-Paul Kogelman <jeanpaulkogelman@me.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Jean-Paul Kogelman via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core and hard forks
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:28:30 -0000
--Apple-Mail=_7D23AA7C-B4C7-477B-AF76-01C7FAF66B10
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
I suppose you can use a timelocked output that is spendable by anyone =
you could go somewhat in this direction=E2=80=A6the thing is it still =
means the wallet must make fee estimations rather than being able to get =
a quick quote.
> On Jul 23, 2015, at 6:25 PM, Jean-Paul Kogelman =
<jeanpaulkogelman@me.com> wrote:
>=20
> I think implicit QoS is far simpler to implement, requires less =
parties and is closer to what Bitcoin started out as: a peer-to-peer =
digital cash system, not a peer-to-let-me-handle-that-for-you-to-peer =
system.
>=20
> jp
>=20
>> On Jul 24, 2015, at 9:08 AM, Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>>=20
>> By using third parties separate from individual miners that do =
bidding on your behalf you get a mechanism that allows QoS guarantees =
and shifting the complexity and risk from the wallet with little =
computational resources to a service with abundance of them. Using =
timelocked contracts it=E2=80=99s possible to enforce the guarantees.
>>=20
>> Negotiating directly with miners via smart contracts seems difficult =
at best.
>>=20
>>=20
>>> On Jul 23, 2015, at 6:03 PM, Jean-Paul Kogelman via bitcoin-dev =
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>=20
>>> Doesn't matter.
>>>=20
>>> It's not going to be perfect given the block time variance among =
other factors but it's far more workable than guessing whether or not =
your transaction is going to end up in a block at all.
>>>=20
>>> jp
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>> On Jul 24, 2015, at 8:53 AM, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA256
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>> On 23 July 2015 20:49:20 GMT-04:00, Jean-Paul Kogelman via =
bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>>>=20
>>>>> And it's obvious how a size cap would interfere with such a QoS =
scheme.
>>>>> Miners wouldn't be able to deliver the below guarantees if they =
have to
>>>>> start excluding transactions.
>>>>=20
>>>> As mining is a random, poisson process, obviously giving guarantees =
without a majority of hashing power isn't possible.
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>=20
>>>> iQE9BAEBCAAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJVsYyK
>>>> AAoJEMCF8hzn9Lnc47AH/28WlecQLb37CiJpcvXO9tC4zqYEodurtB9nBHTSJrug
>>>> VIEXZW53pSTdd3vv2qpGIlHxuYP8QmDSATztwQLuN6XWEszz7TO8MXBfLxKqZyGu
>>>> i83WqSGjMAfwqjl0xR1G7PJgt4+E+0vaAFZc98vLCgZnedbiXRVtTGjhofG1jjTc
>>>> DFMwMZHP0eqWTwtWwqUvnA7PTFHxdqoJruY/t1KceN+JDbBCJWMxBDswU64FXcVH
>>>> 0ecsk9nhLMyylBX/2v4HjCXyayocH8jQ+FpLSP0xxERyS+f1npFX9cxFMq24uXqn
>>>> PcnZfLfaSJ6gMbmhbYG5wYDKN3u732j7dLzSJnMW6jk=3D
>>>> =3DLY1+
>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>=20
--Apple-Mail=_7D23AA7C-B4C7-477B-AF76-01C7FAF66B10
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org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=SEYd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail=_7D23AA7C-B4C7-477B-AF76-01C7FAF66B10--
|
