1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
|
Return-Path: <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BCB9412
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 16 Aug 2016 22:39:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ua0-f194.google.com (mail-ua0-f194.google.com
[209.85.217.194])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A1EE16F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 16 Aug 2016 22:39:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ua0-f194.google.com with SMTP id 109so7596249uat.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=PLSTgCx1lsXJwr9dsdr8UlAE8zry60bp+hx2yeSIBg8=;
b=lFmtJcHVN4xapyXSIyup4wt+c9gwRcpO7UGVjox8owfDaibGyy3NJB9RnBxUklGzl4
uZDMgrhWzvtjzl0n6lMNF8pMuJ4wx6Z+WpkHeUvOfGhFksT/3MrNuk2IN0pvmdk/2E10
qkhz0D81ibg5jIrtLveUlmvFUsg7HGUVzOEsTAoVfaSPyqdYn2MU2xE+rLwojmyzrL4W
UDVot7qU2b8wgSNdHqL1lQqDSOn2zA9xdNngOMXqO37Y+dtv0GlNQ/U85NzzDKrLAxC6
qta4ArZAEHWCEfFmchYyAYb90iMVR0rnvb3Nu7b+UUOxQvd+cVpE1Q99JG8jCuYX6tu8
aXpQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=PLSTgCx1lsXJwr9dsdr8UlAE8zry60bp+hx2yeSIBg8=;
b=bT5SQMv7MIROb2ANcS5zDR/T+kg7PEKFkKKrbMu+I5YKYGj0T5LeYgxQ43dllVCBKT
MN6uEwNMgCLzbbtXwB9DDJEWLPIHoHJi556lv0mkQ75P2hAILJQqXZQTwSwDn6PHWmUI
m1QXqe9DFFXoiRzUxpSJfR5YEGmru0CMn29+d3TO/FFfrX+STIXsCIDGCg/sRsV4NC73
ko8MGZ5XLO4wlnCdJUJBjNu2wW48ituIc1UPnc0GZZzl0Ao40g8TZZnfpR7GjSNRX0yF
aZBAmHhj1vj/IDPtpGW837czG84PuY9cB6Q0lThKc+LV879VmJvdfTpneebKpYkicpCf
Kqtw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouu44C8GEIRkZjsCNktkOzEWsZps6fJpf0rXivkpdyc+ZlIepV1vaeB5iE1gPbxkdoyd0dV4Kkqo1JIJQA==
X-Received: by 10.159.38.73 with SMTP id 67mr18061069uag.136.1471387149300;
Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:39:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.51.77 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.31.51.77 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMZUoKktS=Ku4kpD0bocR4X__ZpWXrkPkdOyXBaYxjq+mr9Pmw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1736097121.90204.1471369988809@privateemail.com>
<201608161937.20748.luke@dashjr.org>
<20160816194332.GA5888@fedora-21-dvm>
<CAMZUoKkAkGRFxpyGMxQMz76L7uW6fsQAYVxkrxi5MQCiBtNnqw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPg+sBi30SgHHXCyipbNpiMRHYWPCRYz6ejQYKrDg3MLJp39EQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAMZUoKktS=Ku4kpD0bocR4X__ZpWXrkPkdOyXBaYxjq+mr9Pmw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:39:08 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPg+sBhykn8BU1LAr1izH0z6nFuOv0PzWjuqq7YJX5r35LDa9Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Russell O'Connor" <roconnor@blockstream.io>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114950dc5c78ca053a3804a1
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] New BIP: Dealing with OP_IF and OP_NOTIF
malleability in P2WSH
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 22:39:10 -0000
--001a114950dc5c78ca053a3804a1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Aug 17, 2016 00:36, "Russell O'Connor" <roconnor@blockstream.io> wrote:
> Can I already do something similar with replace by fee, or are there
limits on that?
BIP125 and mempool eviction both require the replacing transaction to have
higher fee, to compensate for the cost of relaying the replaced
transaction(s).
--
Pieter
--001a114950dc5c78ca053a3804a1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
<p dir="ltr">On Aug 17, 2016 00:36, "Russell O'Connor" <<a href="mailto:roconnor@blockstream.io">roconnor@blockstream.io</a>> wrote:</p>
<p dir="ltr">> Can I already do something similar with replace by fee, or are there limits on that? </p>
<p dir="ltr">BIP125 and mempool eviction both require the replacing transaction to have higher fee, to compensate for the cost of relaying the replaced transaction(s).</p>
<p dir="ltr">-- <br>
Pieter</p>
--001a114950dc5c78ca053a3804a1--
|
