1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
|
Return-Path: <alex.mizrahi@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F9118D7
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 6 Jul 2016 06:49:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-qk0-f171.google.com (mail-qk0-f171.google.com
[209.85.220.171])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85D47AA
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 6 Jul 2016 06:49:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qk0-f171.google.com with SMTP id t127so307766798qkf.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 05 Jul 2016 23:49:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=5bhEPdc/6F5GMxZtkYpgcy67AxaqobfzRYuAahQ/Zzo=;
b=KjQ1u1ISxefukxlggU7Q8UmRoCExlKHBqm2+kEvmwsrcWfQr3mOQd1dJITPvr55wj8
ut/kn0vWCZV4mKnVa0ombpAt4VzgRF/Sty24zCRETLNEoms0O7SENapAO4yHDxWEzefz
9WG7ewbqVZDhnFO6VH6ynBjkoIoMHExk19wKPKk3m9hpvs90FXmnTZ2pleozK3h+fr9q
f8iPj/FddMeGj5fl8CLXfuHMV/PlE7J4BfbDEQWF33eS70/74w3lOE1+edwuHDaRN7gz
sGiMmGoAqU4RB2lKyYSPSgbXpJ5OXsxVgtDSTzZ6taXxgfKNmsL2Ged7UD0LuQoz247t
YWsw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=5bhEPdc/6F5GMxZtkYpgcy67AxaqobfzRYuAahQ/Zzo=;
b=UhVKj2UYpE00RvrsTSE3jU82B/yp0DI0OQ58BoC/M/Ge6dZEqatfIqQhwPBTNkefjO
axE3PnJYbop/pOBl3HtrKe+a/fie4T30LqcvokFFOdteB8cAKGFKx8Z3095ptIP128ad
etlhilKItXumsdUHaRmJM87a4BdyFycDfBbSBQzjFxeMSXFQs2hcCnU9rQ6ta7QOo1cb
ZOgrRvB4oE8mtfETibJltrktK1GnayMLM0J9ylmL1r5kxgrfMXSRGwjh1gyvMw1U1wMC
WTj093Q1XP5OSw8Kx4k0euJey9tT6BErla1JLCxTVhEMPOd4yhRhHBRbXQDmkwTbJc+8
R3Uw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKe+biGpKG5rRySOQ17uarUnORU7fP2n9tDXZTz5JL0VNhcLfGFLZ3XXSGCsEQb2bMOkTUO9Mukg4ojwQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.200.137 with SMTP id t9mr29111999qkl.128.1467787740591;
Tue, 05 Jul 2016 23:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.19.159 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 23:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAH+Axy5A-_oDoPjabyzzAF8kVq9DsFwonEYPp9EU+Hf_BP1-DA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+1nnrmZAdzBn-FMBVMGtp4n7bbG8W0VEGvi1WopS-M49zBXpw@mail.gmail.com>
<201605260353.06939.luke@dashjr.org>
<20160705174636.GA24068@fedora-21-dvm>
<201607060122.20593.luke@dashjr.org>
<CAH+Axy5A-_oDoPjabyzzAF8kVq9DsFwonEYPp9EU+Hf_BP1-DA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alex Mizrahi <alex.mizrahi@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 09:49:00 +0300
Message-ID: <CAE28kUQ_rX4LtwU0oohABUv0-rCXRhtObkboJxdvwx44fCeEyA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1145beb0e23b950536f1f6a3
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Number Request: Open Asset
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 06:49:02 -0000
--001a1145beb0e23b950536f1f6a3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> I'm curious to hear the answers to the questions Luke asked earlier. I
> also read through the documentation and wasn't convinced it was thought out
> well enough to actually build something on top of,
>
There are many colored coin protocols in use. OpenAssets is probably the
most popular one, but it has many critical flaws IMHO.
https://github.com/bitcoinx/colored-coin-tools/wiki/OpenAssets-deficiencies
> but there's no reason it can't get a number as a work-in-progress.
>
The protocol is not a work-in-progress, it is already in use, you cannot
change it without breaking stuff.
The doc can be improved, though. There is a lot of fluff but the actual
important stuff gets just few ambiguous sentences.
I hope it does continue to get worked on, though. The lack of response or
> discussion worries me that it might become an abandoned project.
>
The original author, Flavien, have abandoned it, he now does a private
blockchain thing, OpenChain.
There are others who still use OpenAssets, e.g. Nicolas, but the protocol
can't be changed.
There are other colored coin protocols in existence/in development, though.
--001a1145beb0e23b950536f1f6a3
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><br>=
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-=
left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);p=
adding-left:1ex"><p dir=3D"ltr">I'm curious to hear the answers to the =
questions Luke asked earlier. I also read through the documentation and was=
n't convinced it was thought out well enough to actually build somethin=
g on top of,</p></blockquote><div>There are many colored coin protocols in =
use. OpenAssets is probably the most popular one, but it has many critical =
flaws IMHO.</div><div><a href=3D"https://github.com/bitcoinx/colored-coin-t=
ools/wiki/OpenAssets-deficiencies">https://github.com/bitcoinx/colored-coin=
-tools/wiki/OpenAssets-deficiencies</a><br></div><div>=C2=A0<br></div><bloc=
kquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-=
width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);paddin=
g-left:1ex"><p dir=3D"ltr"> but there's no reason it can't get a nu=
mber as a work-in-progress.</p></blockquote><div>The protocol is not a work=
-in-progress, it is already in use, you cannot change it without breaking s=
tuff.</div><div>The doc can be improved, though. There is a lot of fluff bu=
t the actual important stuff gets just few ambiguous sentences.</div><div><=
br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8e=
x;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,2=
04,204);padding-left:1ex">
<p dir=3D"ltr">I hope it does continue to get worked on, though. The lack o=
f response or discussion worries me that it might become an abandoned proje=
ct.</p></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The original author, Flavien, have =
abandoned it, he now does a private blockchain thing, OpenChain.</div><div>=
There are others who still use OpenAssets, e.g. Nicolas, but the protocol c=
an't be changed.</div><div><br></div><div>There are other colored coin =
protocols in existence/in development, though.</div></div></div></div>
--001a1145beb0e23b950536f1f6a3--
|
