summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/6e/ca616463afeb67e18cc9e1d90726d0d2fa9ec6
blob: 440d6804bc5b7f36465746873cf2598fb6cd93dd (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <dhuff@jrbobdobbs.org>) id 1R4IWS-0005E3-EW
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:27:00 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from mail-gx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.161.174])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1R4IWR-00044v-K6
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:27:00 +0000
Received: by gxk6 with SMTP id 6so1688356gxk.5
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:26:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.101.174.18 with SMTP id b18mr1406885anp.75.1316111787196;
	Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-226-210.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-226-210.cisco.com
	[64.101.226.210])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k12sm17075675anc.19.2011.09.15.11.36.25
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
	Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Doug <mith@jrbobdobbs.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3)
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
	boundary="Apple-Mail=_5D42AD25-BB7A-4D5F-9395-09DC774ADDF9";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
From: Douglas Huff <dhuff@jrbobdobbs.org>
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T3HCVAn5ECuPWfAyZ4zt3WCbyKPF-7DV1HY2j2TKjavrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:36:20 -0500
Message-Id: <402A5924-1950-4455-9DCA-5C49570FDC73@jrbobdobbs.org>
References: <CABsx9T2MKTYCeOqERXKBMYEqNEK4eo9jGt81gZE1=Fv=s3wEqA@mail.gmail.com>
	<201109142206.40455.luke@dashjr.org> <4E71F5F8.2020807@jerviss.org>
	<201109151136.47485.luke@dashjr.org>
	<CABsx9T2kQTAA77Q=qYc2iKNftQSd8ficfhcXL2W6kX0JUhe3Dw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPiTikXTf=pDrYzfJkxrieEaMVCPGsgB-v-31J-woWjFopt5LQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABsx9T3HCVAn5ECuPWfAyZ4zt3WCbyKPF-7DV1HY2j2TKjavrg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1R4IWR-00044v-K6
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Request review: drop misbehaving peers
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:27:00 -0000


--Apple-Mail=_5D42AD25-BB7A-4D5F-9395-09DC774ADDF9
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=iso-8859-1

On Sep 15, 2011, at 1:17 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote:

>> On Sep 15, 2011 11:20 AM, "Gavin Andresen" <gavinandresen@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>>> I'm ignoring bandwidth DoS attacks-- we already have the
>>> -maxreceivebuffer option to deal with those.
>>=20
>> I disagree with this comment. The way this is currently implemented =
is a mem
>> exhaustion dos in itself waiting to happen and does nothing to =
prevent
>> network flooding.
>=20
> Have you submitted a patch to fix it?

No, it requires the entirety of the p2p network code be reworked and =
large patches aren't accepted.

No reason to take that off list, it's an issue that's been acknowledged =
on irc numerous times and is in the public channel logs.

--=20
Douglas Huff=

--Apple-Mail=_5D42AD25-BB7A-4D5F-9395-09DC774ADDF9
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=WO34
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_5D42AD25-BB7A-4D5F-9395-09DC774ADDF9--