blob: 003d177e09ded1ab579b341f75b02412c9288b52 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <witchspace81@gmail.com>) id 1Qlccq-00054t-RH
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:04:24 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.161.175 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.161.175; envelope-from=witchspace81@gmail.com;
helo=mail-gx0-f175.google.com;
Received: from mail-gx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.161.175])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1Qlccp-0002FT-SZ
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:04:24 +0000
Received: by gxk3 with SMTP id 3so95916gxk.34
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:04:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.151.137.6 with SMTP id p6mr187859ybn.264.1311667457888; Tue,
26 Jul 2011 01:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.150.147.15 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201107260218.59313.luke@dashjr.org>
References: <CAJ1JLts5_r6hHoJR-gS-CuuvS00p=RQ6iYbCyOkBDcvgs1xtew@mail.gmail.com>
<201107260022.24961.luke@dashjr.org>
<CAJ1JLttnARz=f0UmzJKpCXpMeKg1X_R7Jfwv7tZq_pJqn8LbQQ@mail.gmail.com>
<201107260218.59313.luke@dashjr.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:04:17 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJNQ0st0+DU1y0C4hYGK76fzcGFKt7bch+YCJMy-H-eZQriDaA@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Smith <witchspace81@gmail.com>
To: Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd58e98e4126304a8f460f0
X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(witchspace81[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.1 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in
digit (witchspace81[at]gmail.com)
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1Qlccp-0002FT-SZ
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoin DNS addresses
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:04:24 -0000
--000e0cd58e98e4126304a8f460f0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> I only meant that foo.bar.net is not the same formatting.
> foo@bar.net would be.
>
Yes please use email-like addresses, whatever is decided on the underlying
protocol.
JS
--000e0cd58e98e4126304a8f460f0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">I only meant that <a href="http://foo.bar.net" target="_blank">foo.bar.net</a> is not the same formatting.<br>
<a href="mailto:foo@bar.net">foo@bar.net</a> would be.<br></blockquote><div><br>Yes please use email-like addresses, whatever is decided on the underlying protocol.<br><br>JS<br><br></div></div>
--000e0cd58e98e4126304a8f460f0--
|
