1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
|
Return-Path: <ahmedzsales18@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29A27898
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:29:32 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-vk0-f67.google.com (mail-vk0-f67.google.com
[209.85.213.67])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 886A2141
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:29:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vkd66 with SMTP id 66so1664485vkd.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=VHotlkwcAPQG6gchyDueo3yAHQpkiGFK5tGXnTzT0vg=;
b=0WSE6+x80i6SjZKvuLQh0fA/sfc0182tieu3J4HCAqek7kvhKztlAZzjpTbTKxgl+O
qJGny6Y+Pk8pFpV/HZ6XZgf/th09tipTaH2JkSwvUaJ56WEZq0ohwrq50MvYkumhO/7V
ksmqO1qtFv9EoXsl41kZ71flf4D4asPRlTcEVgNfZ7xzyppdr2YTHfWegqhOZ3D2fCum
jtHVDCVOG0nPpjEwVZ8hQOzBqCWkdcXSQhomJi96cN5Xi33Bsg5eu2ni+YpOdQfoFW8c
ATfJYE4Rfi2NegKSfuOOcdwRG10VDHcNF0P2G+9id8lY08t43/Y1ldxSI3mraeV7B0Dh
QVkw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.163.50 with SMTP id yf18mr6173130vdb.93.1440106170694;
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.31.109.134 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+BnGuH8V7B+R4PONemjdjhmEpQB_yaNouGFMyAgauBFre8F7g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABm2gDrfB+c1QTZippYYNX-uhcd9NYUcR-VHug6FYtPmSoz4Bw@mail.gmail.com>
<55CB2C57.1070307@mail.bihthai.net>
<CABm2gDp92omWk-eg5Sp8u4V8Z9hJcT_TcwyZyaw3Nm4ypLiWXQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDqH2V0D5XWco9AJ_WNcFUyjkaWGj_oonmKZRocqOvqYVw@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDosTUR0rt9ks2n9iEAoe0Z2L8OCQdcw7s39dQSuDG4=tg@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+BnGuH8V7B+R4PONemjdjhmEpQB_yaNouGFMyAgauBFre8F7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:29:30 +0100
Message-ID: <CADr=VrSZc6WsLKaz-_pbiwx9Fo5PmxJwCbxe59mNuq+0EnoYxA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ahmed Zsales <ahmedzsales18@gmail.com>
To: Elliot Olds <elliot.olds@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2ce38be4231051dc4d817
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,
HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] A summary list of all concerns related to not
rising the block size
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:29:32 -0000
--001a11c2ce38be4231051dc4d817
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Add:
For - If everyone agrees an increase is required at some point, The longer
you leave it the greater the numbers who have to upgrade
Against - Insufficient testing before moving to production ready releases
sets a bad precedent
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Elliot Olds via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> To be clear, these two are just my personal lists of arguments on
>> "each side" to clear my mind and try to be perfectly objective.
>> [...]
>> Here's the updated both-thread lists:
>>
>>
>> http://0bin.net/paste/igHZMgeoIbYjCJd9#ovaOUlSAKvQYT2p3VXuIuUmNk2XyLH-Gn=
jR5NZMZgFb
>
>
> I thought this was a good idea, so I turned my personal notes into a site
> attempting to list all the strongest arguments and counterarguments on th=
e
> block size debate. I made mine a bit more detailed.
>
> Here's the site: https://sites.google.com/site/bitcoinblocksizedebate/
>
> Feedback welcome.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
--001a11c2ce38be4231051dc4d817
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">Add:=C2=A0<div><br></div><div>For - If everyone agrees an =
increase is required at some point, The longer you leave it the greater the=
numbers who have to upgrade</div><div><br></div><div>Against - Insufficien=
t testing before moving to production ready releases sets a bad precedent</=
div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu,=
Aug 20, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Elliot Olds via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr">&l=
t;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank=
">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquot=
e class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc sol=
id;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=
=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <span di=
r=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" targ=
et=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<b=
r><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:=
1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">To be clear, these two are just my persona=
l lists of arguments on<br>
"each side" to clear my mind and try to be perfectly objective.<b=
r>[...]<br>Here's the updated both-thread lists:<br>
<br>
<a href=3D"http://0bin.net/paste/igHZMgeoIbYjCJd9#ovaOUlSAKvQYT2p3VXuIuUmNk=
2XyLH-GnjR5NZMZgFb" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://0bin.net/pa=
ste/igHZMgeoIbYjCJd9#ovaOUlSAKvQYT2p3VXuIuUmNk2XyLH-GnjR5NZMZgFb</a></block=
quote><div><br></div><div>I thought this was a good idea, so I turned my pe=
rsonal notes into a site attempting to list all the strongest arguments and=
counterarguments on the block size debate. I made mine a bit more detailed=
.=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div>Here's the site:=C2=A0<a href=3D"https=
://sites.google.com/site/bitcoinblocksizedebate/" target=3D"_blank">https:/=
/sites.google.com/site/bitcoinblocksizedebate/</a></div><div><br></div><div=
>Feedback welcome.=C2=A0</div><div>=C2=A0</div></div></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
--001a11c2ce38be4231051dc4d817--
|
