1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <stick@gk2.sk>) id 1XgxLF-0007Il-Jw
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:56:49 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1XgxLD-0007Kw-Jc
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:56:49 +0000
Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id k14so3969199wgh.31
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Wed, 22 Oct 2014 07:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=SXkJ5ltGt743pl7Ma1PHhmxGyCl5jwQbSk3abGv8M7U=;
b=IPu2ETm9ZMaYFOjDvjxs8UwJlNOhOUEGayFs9X4zZE1/wujNVudVsuZtcGvwr1akVM
9ywYndVgZYPshD1jAiWYJJYx2B0ShSsX5XU4GVNuErZt/C43SEahOOA9yBr2vk2i+hdI
bNfR15miiDRy1EMhOp+owOht6snjZ+iPydBkBv+NTgSRQcyv2sz9a6Do4x8NzLx+qWEb
RwkYzcnl4ASFg5CDu7xMrDvE/Ao3abB7zi/aneyhwvZYm+Tya3lm75u6//okBkAHX05R
G5oxZP6ciC3NosH9cYZP4655K128NXi//eYJQGIKdcccgGg0vVFJ45YwkeVp0vhcw61t
T8fA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmnmOc7HrhlFSs8q9SAerusdAlpfIDqJWuGzgD+wa0GXbeRLjhDdHfwJSFVZ8e3itxWAEeT
X-Received: by 10.180.104.99 with SMTP id gd3mr6361138wib.10.1413989801166;
Wed, 22 Oct 2014 07:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tetra.site (nat-0-15.lam.cz. [80.92.242.254])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
ky3sm19147883wjb.39.2014.10.22.07.56.38 for <multiple recipients>
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Wed, 22 Oct 2014 07:56:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5447C5A5.8080400@gk2.sk>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 16:56:37 +0200
From: Pavol Rusnak <stick@gk2.sk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mem Wallet <memwallet.info@gmail.com>,
bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <CAKzHBKkHpod+7T0uCtESVNFmgFAbGF8-AFJxKmfUwA-pkt_BrA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKzHBKkHpod+7T0uCtESVNFmgFAbGF8-AFJxKmfUwA-pkt_BrA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1XgxLD-0007Kw-Jc
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] cryptographic review requested
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:56:49 -0000
On 09/23/2014 11:12 PM, Mem Wallet wrote:
> - M,Sender_Address = ReceiveMessage( eM, Decrypting_Key ) It is
> acceptable for deterministic nonces to be used for signatures, however
> nonces generated for ECIES must be high quality random bytes. (excepting
> unit test vectors)
Could you please describe what might get wrong if one uses deterministic
nonces for ECIES as well? Thanks!
--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol Rusnak <stick@gk2.sk>
|
