1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
|
Return-Path: <gcbd-bitcoin-development-2@m.gmane.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42462323
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:20:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CE07195
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:20:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <gcbd-bitcoin-development-2@m.gmane.org>)
id 1ZHSml-0005tq-0Q for bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org;
Tue, 21 Jul 2015 10:20:23 +0200
Received: from x55b2ba91.dyn.telefonica.de ([85.178.186.145])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 21 Jul 2015 10:20:22 +0200
Received: from andreas by x55b2ba91.dyn.telefonica.de with local (Gmexim 0.1
(Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 21 Jul 2015 10:20:22 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
From: Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 10:20:17 +0200
Message-ID: <mokvc1$p4m$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <CA+w+GKRRfT=8xALsVMqEUAZWzd87Lf4HqFPuDigatY+nHzafQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: x55b2ba91.dyn.telefonica.de
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+w+GKRRfT=8xALsVMqEUAZWzd87Lf4HqFPuDigatY+nHzafQQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] QR code alternatives (was: Proposal: extend bip70
with OpenAlias)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:20:27 -0000
Hmm, the advanced QR code standards are perhaps even useful if we don't
change anything about BIP7x. Because if we can cram more data without
loosing scanning performance this maybe means also we can stay with the
data we have but improve scanning?
|
