1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
|
Return-Path: <nxtchg@hush.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24F3DBC4
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:15:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from smtp1.hushmail.com (smtp1.hushmail.com [65.39.178.135])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAC6920A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:15:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp1.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id AF82840140
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:15:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w7.hushmail.com [65.39.178.32])
by smtp1.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP;
Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:15:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99)
id 6E857417EC; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:15:05 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 15:15:05 +0300
To: "Wladimir J. van der Laan" <laanwj@gmail.com>
From: "NxtChg" <nxtchg@hush.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150627120935.GD25420@amethyst.visucore.com>
References: <CAPg+sBjOj9eXiDG0F6G54SVKkStF_1HRu2wzGqtFF5X_NAWy4w@mail.gmail.com>
<20150627074259.GA25420@amethyst.visucore.com>
<CABm2gDr3orTHMN1q8vGmy3NpXWPy5i=zHhGneDGUk=ney3-e+Q@mail.gmail.com>
<20150627120935.GD25420@amethyst.visucore.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20150627121505.6E857417EC@smtp.hushmail.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] The need for larger blocks
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:15:06 -0000
On 6/27/2015 at 3:09 PM, "Wladimir J. van der Laan" <laanwj@gmail.com> wrote:
>Not sure though. The only way to find out is to propose them and see. Maybe wait a bit until things have cooled down...
And then we are again at the mercy of a single "decider" to judge whether something is controversial or not?
It was pointed several times before that with enough loud minority you can make any change seem controversial.
|
