1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
|
Return-Path: <eric@voskuil.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D69941239
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 18 Feb 2018 19:14:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pg0-f45.google.com (mail-pg0-f45.google.com [74.125.83.45])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B1A020C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 18 Feb 2018 19:14:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id g12so5092617pgs.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 18 Feb 2018 11:14:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=voskuil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
bh=JqsB+EVUmKSx4ws37VPrxnN5cpQxvO1Xk+8EbkBQP9U=;
b=TxLRznDFSyfK6D6m+Ud2ohi/7AJoeONmwXzJKeCoeVr0vlDO4fqTE7srVt7JN0j5Qg
0IRRRKCbGJlyLqb1/KEi0vadWB40KsAIE7pwJRE8OYCjQJKznWkqCrBQVg+2xyh2aAit
zEoe7D3+RlXrsdTD5hMwOSht76nO/oNEmjfkcTf7CkUbe6gtK59R7eO72w06cZl4roC4
oGKolreu7HLvEzFE4yC9Ha1UzDlxLwJZiqmgaz9345uOMPo4/yI0+VgIuIZF2joA/Ed8
dHuY4e/VckV4/sn0JMvB0J5JqXKc7Q3j2FtPjXeUJv7JPjLz6nllgs9nrqmLmdjQIFYt
qmFg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
bh=JqsB+EVUmKSx4ws37VPrxnN5cpQxvO1Xk+8EbkBQP9U=;
b=Ll7Fudr0lX2shYW+/lmZml6FzTahNad1G4el6hSGhFWg/IoOn4GUJWEj+dbuW4S3Y8
SI/cTx/zu1T3qDQAk4MwpSvO45sqVJPAR+cjngKCU7vuvr6oLA/wz+qkbeXgHJRtPh9X
v6leLtLG1mkCgcRM50s821djvVO8TiaMbpNM6ebCg5kNkZFkRJHb79b0jT3wM0mDZBA5
Pp7OTL5iB71eXCEzTnlzvYbbCrladH5ScRGkUxDfhh9sQRYaAkt40aGCS7PmGKREQgt5
Z/S5iocTcfof5u6RIMazSA9wcKjYTRbHgKVQRypuVDdWCctkJGFJxTXftYsKfsJF4Og/
Awcg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPB1NUminI5V0x+ONTJAxPidy7v0vkqd8nlrK/nhAVHOVUHBYUaG
q6fP+kr/PF5UVAoIA4CcJZKBEg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225UBxdvY/Aze2jcrS/b7adUITdKQ8+4X7eNyrGKIgUtANO2FvgkMfGNxp45hwpxc7jFzHFGuQ==
X-Received: by 10.98.35.66 with SMTP id j63mr12422122pfj.140.1518981264696;
Sun, 18 Feb 2018 11:14:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:380:7052:2025:5c3c:5aa:8527:442c?
([2600:380:7052:2025:5c3c:5aa:8527:442c])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
t63sm16278091pfj.44.2018.02.18.11.14.23
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Sun, 18 Feb 2018 11:14:24 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Eric Voskuil <eric@voskuil.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15D60)
In-Reply-To: <Jy0MuLuWihgu3VcuWL_kxYtFK-JTx0u17G3MhQw1EIp4sXTNWBMfhoNruAfrPp3A17HRNXwpbTIAXiTBKHYOKgf3LFfUZEXoglp5VSiC3wc=@protonmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 11:14:22 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <54BE283E-5DD2-4BD4-9218-DD9E9AFC8A99@voskuil.org>
References: <640e2daf-343d-62be-d6da-a2c1b4bc2bfd@cannon-ciota.info>
<9IZu22-jNUMzMcq7VK0qdzd2tj333lWOhOUe3A5V6OUaFlpQiS8lRFm-ZdGew4Im5KQ9qF4nF3WT3QugHMVrOi3Lr82FvyH9w-XG32NH7oQ=@protonmail.com>
<5E8E7227-8F90-40A2-B3D6-CA9D03CD3FEC@voskuil.org>
<Jy0MuLuWihgu3VcuWL_kxYtFK-JTx0u17G3MhQw1EIp4sXTNWBMfhoNruAfrPp3A17HRNXwpbTIAXiTBKHYOKgf3LFfUZEXoglp5VSiC3wc=@protonmail.com>
To: rhavar@protonmail.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 19:28:58 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Increased blockspace enabled by SegWit limited to
just witness data?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 19:14:25 -0000
If the new rule is more restrictive the original limit remains.
e
On Feb 18, 2018, at 11:04, rhavar@protonmail.com wrote:
>> No rule has been =E2=80=9Creplaced=E2=80=9D.
>=20
> It really has been. The code is no longer checks the size of a block, but t=
he weight of it. For all intents and purposes the block size limits has been=
replaced in favor of a block weight limit. It's just been designed such tha=
t the new rule is more restrictive than the one it replaces.
>=20
> Now, I'm not doubting you can argue the semantics on the difference betwee=
n "replacing with a more restrictive rule" and "leaving the existing rules, b=
ut adding a new one" -- but it's uninteresting and only serves to confuse no=
vice's like CANNON into thinking that there are two rules/spaces/limits for t=
ransactions.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> =E2=80=8B-Ryan
>=20
> =E2=80=8B
>=20
> -------- Original Message --------
>> On February 18, 2018 1:39 PM, Eric Voskuil <eric@voskuil.org> wrote:
>>=20
>> As a soft fork, all preceding rules remain in effect. No rule has been =E2=
=80=9Creplaced=E2=80=9D. Blocks must validate against pre-segwit rules or ar=
e invalid. Additional rules are applied that further restrict validity, and c=
onsider additional (witness) data in the context of the block.
>>=20
>> e
>>=20
>>> On Feb 18, 2018, at 09:04, Ryan Havar via bitcoin-dev bitcoin-dev@lists.=
linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>>> No, you are misunderstanding. The block size limit (1MB) has been replac=
ed in favor of a block weight limit (4M weight). Bytes which must be sent to=
old clients are weighted at 4 units each which is what allows it to be a so=
ft fork.
>>> So as such, there's not two separate limits or anything.
>>> P.S. what's up with your signature lol
>>> =E2=80=8B-Ryan
>>> =E2=80=8B
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>> On February 18, 2018 11:26 AM, CANNON via bitcoin-dev bitcoin-dev@lists=
.linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA512
>>>> I have a question in reference to the increased blockspace enabled
>>>> by the segregated witness upgrade. Is this extra blockspace beyond
>>>> the legacy 1 MB limit limited to just witness data?
>>>> Cannon
>>>> PGP Fingerprint: 2BB5 15CD 66E7 4E28 45DC 6494 A5A2 2879 3F06 E832
>>>> Email: cannon@cannon-ciota.info
>>>> NOTICE: ALL EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE NOT SIGNED/ENCRYPTED WITH PGP SHOULD
>>>> BE CONSIDERED POTENTIALLY FORGED, AND NOT PRIVATE.
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJaiajLAAoJEAYDai9lH2mwDbMQAKgJseZG9oOoP9WJlESFdAzm
>>>> jLM69KLF4RVWDQjMWCtyVayyolXMLavW6fL4GL7/ztLYSl9Pz+FDlH3Qgo1GLDx4
>>>> fRUkmb0ApLBSAjmdqM+kWjgq3s6/oZaIkNxGeyK5SYY4QhF80Z42PWLBPKjAc7vn
>>>> pe7Im13NwtyJiRuCmq4e1z6GmW86fFOKOsR4rlWcftHOFmH8Gz5d9KK9LbPqU6Ca
>>>> +rde8yb+A9uXEv3O9MqeLId7FYSJixgzFGJosidVkAVQI7YZ0TAfG4HSwKjtqDz7
>>>> SW2Bs3nDeiCr2QN7Su9TUaoSN/yKTBOw5jnql9cNOYuf4GAG0MXWinmYP8MWCiqh
>>>> bIrzvOnlZGapX/36Fpab67VDcFnXJJc8ofqYmn+oUoW/q7geQpu/V1oz+AR9nD/d
>>>> n8wFxvZdRlTbq2XDXySaontxNH0rd80fSG5SJtO5Js9hK/vNG+Xa7Zc+76gEtvlF
>>>> 5G1F6MOcsoXUDCnMteuNxaZx6TPML6RuWVmbR1wXOaX4qZ01p7AsjQlTIcrlVDsB
>>>> LVGW70wjfETBCffn1JQvFmIK7NzggIUuYfLF0IrfM4BrTa/01RnmfBOpWGiIvyIG
>>>> qZqKLYDbW7BDkc/HMtAonR/0t6bTUv/388USSnbMakO9bvih0xxIw4NWTyoSoef/
>>>> I+W6ny7qXt+pegLF4cYL
>>>> =3DYqEM
>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>>>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>>>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>>>=20
>>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>>=20
>>=20
>=20
|
