1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
|
Return-Path: <daniel@gap600.com>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7CDC002D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 2 Dec 2022 06:34:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C12981D34
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 2 Dec 2022 06:34:21 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 8C12981D34
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gap600.com header.i=@gap600.com
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=meH3X81r
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id mdwvHq_gC8la
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 2 Dec 2022 06:34:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 2B9AC81CDC
Received: from mail-vs1-xe36.google.com (mail-vs1-xe36.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e36])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B9AC81CDC
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 2 Dec 2022 06:34:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe36.google.com with SMTP id d185so3828209vsd.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 01 Dec 2022 22:34:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gap600.com; s=google;
h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=W9Hoy72ru2d6Ap1SzzaqCysRA8lO8m39b+WWWU4qOzw=;
b=meH3X81rQ8h6uo6mlPuApVg/8wblDIbQJnA+fXDErpi2m8ARIFs/nkuNTh7Y4AkcZG
mJFvkcKHea34mWBWKxNo97Cl5kkxYWNnbMnaytC76DCziUPMjHBIfEl8CVpAoHo8L7SN
95WILN8H2QgmpQjaqVggJJKY4IsBdK5i9KMIZhI3AuNgzrA6dGpnSIQIWiKkkJ1RInfW
A6cvGegPlGDkIlFKHbh2W8t5jPfUVNfxSt7PTwomjHLhEsxNa16ZEGCJ6QAA5VHczm1h
S8VgvAdPXUjpB4YTbyBeO28ttI9jXOQbZZWFGy4BiurNhluQg8EuvCDgZcjJt3b+ZJdD
Ljdw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
:reply-to;
bh=W9Hoy72ru2d6Ap1SzzaqCysRA8lO8m39b+WWWU4qOzw=;
b=zgGoDUf4eSIi3frljGtvmdOVhFsWXVuPf9dQVp7qqLenzDxxrmptU5UD6VtJq2mCh8
gV1EhEpYV9vr7WTYlUHK+DKS+ahAiOlJvOhNRnv+9YdKClQDBqPNum4vnsAvpjhQE0Z8
LsoX+fYADhjLrczuVF37HvmlsNfC7BlUx+nUW6zny2aEGQ4BMZiEZ3n7+ysBu28ed1FH
jUnFUrx5IVLpBqTYZPWdy5Cr7MbiBV54GcM7VF5Ja/82qvbmbrFJTJy/q1mRWynEro9u
z8wyjBRM+IyZw12/4T/awC02xNRf2nqn0E2aI+zqWTH4KDFdO4uTsr7YuauApCZk0WSv
pbLw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmZwt17kNn+bkB2ZjSA9ZK7U20nB7xX+0V8QB3jS3Mwve+kXlFv
DEEYQiXSa5+ChY4q6OstrtIhOjbs1J9KfOFY8um11HPK4kTBYQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7/U9i301rQlXWGkVBDPVj72QCJEgI84xNF2WME5WqtaUj7H1iuJgjJoDpGVoXXUamjxAz5mA4S+BBxeKaCEqE=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:6504:0:b0:3b0:b7dd:4d0a with SMTP id
z4-20020a676504000000b003b0b7dd4d0amr10186107vsb.17.1669962858859; Thu, 01
Dec 2022 22:34:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACkWPs8-rZpGSJSEyLsg9gVAuPpHztXWSZvfGscGJCn05th0DQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJowKgJDPLiJBH6bFntsvLn=auqrncqCA-D_m4H9NE_Y1OSj3w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJowKgJDPLiJBH6bFntsvLn=auqrncqCA-D_m4H9NE_Y1OSj3w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daniel Lipshitz <daniel@gap600.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 08:34:07 +0200
Message-ID: <CACkWPs99nqCDpdTdADAMnWHaEO55a6jK+-dk0=3M0BsDcveAAQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fda77105eed2861c"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 03 Dec 2022 00:19:46 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Opt-in full-RBF] Zero-conf apps in immediate
danger
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2022 06:34:21 -0000
--000000000000fda77105eed2861c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
If fullRBF would become default and this would become dominant, zero-conf
acceptance would become extremely difficult and would impact significantly
this market share because its not the everyday users who would actually
worry about it however the attackers would be all over it.
As it is today the network has brief periods of stress when trxs are
delayed but in general clears regularly and from time to time there is
stress. Today actors' wallets and merchants etc already have the option of
RBF.
________________________________
Daniel Lipshitz
GAP600| www.gap600.com
Phone: +44 113 4900 117
Skype: daniellipshitz123
Twitter: @daniellipshitz
On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 12:04 AM Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com> wrote:
> There has never been any enforcement of miner preferences. The
> convention is changing quickly, since miners are squeezed for cash and want
> to capture every nickel, plus there are bounties for full rbf being posted
> every day.
>
> I would suggest considering to continue doing business, as usual, as if
> full rbf is present.
>
> This means:
>
> - managing risk
> - waiting for confirmations if the risk is too high
> - using lightning if possible
>
> No other coin or chain offers a safer way to do business than lightning
> over bitcoin.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 7:32 AM Daniel Lipshitz via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> HI All
>>
>> I am the CEO of GAP600. We guarantee zero confirmed Bitcoin and other
>> crypto transactions, BTC is a primary part of our business. Our guarantee
>> enables our customers to recognise zero-conf deposits. We reimburse our
>> clients value of the trx should we get it wrong and a transaction we
>> confirmed gets double spent.
>>
>> Should full RBF become default enabled and significantly adopted this
>> would have a major impact on the capacity to accept zerof confs on mainnet.
>> With the end result being this use case will be forced to move to a
>> different chain, with lightning being just another option.
>>
>> I wanted to share some statistics about how significant this use case is.
>> GAP600 clients are primarily payment processors and non custodial
>> liquidity providers; you can see some of our clients on our site
>> www.gap600.com. There are also merchants who have developed their own
>> tools so GAP600 statistics are only a subset of the full use case.
>>
>> I do not know of any wallet, exchange or custodian who accepts zero conf
>> without having some sort of solution in place. The market seems to be fully
>> aware of the risks of zero-conf. The opt-RBF seems to be a solution which
>> gives a clear free choice for actors.
>>
>> Statistics for consideration as a sample of the zero conf use case -
>>
>>
>> 1. As of end of Nov 2022 - GAP600 has processed i.e responded to
>> circa 15M transactions
>> 2. These transactions have a cumulative value of 2.3B USD value.
>> 3. We currently are seeing circa 1.5M transactions queired per month.
>>
>>
>> It's a sizable amount of trxs on mainet and we are by no means the full
>> market of platforms accepting zero-conf. I realise there are other
>> considerations which BTC has, I would urge you to take into account the
>> major risk being placed on this significant market share when deciding to
>> make this feature default enabled and encouraging full adoption.
>>
>> Thank you for your consideration
>> Daniel
>> ________________________________
>>
>> Daniel Lipshitz
>> GAP600| www.gap600.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>
>
--000000000000fda77105eed2861c
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">If fullRBF would become default and this would become domi=
nant, zero-conf acceptance would become extremely difficult and would impac=
t significantly this market share because its not the everyday users who wo=
uld actually worry about it however the attackers would=C2=A0be all over it=
.<div><br></div><div>As it is today the network has brief periods of stress=
when trxs are delayed but in general clears regularly and from time to tim=
e there is stress. Today actors' wallets and merchants=C2=A0etc already=
have the option of RBF.<br clear=3D"all"><div><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gm=
ail_signature" data-smartmail=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><di=
v dir=3D"ltr"><div style=3D"font-size:12.8px">_____________________________=
___</div><div style=3D"font-size:12.8px"><br></div><div style=3D"font-size:=
12.8px"><font face=3D"tahoma, sans-serif">Daniel Lipshitz</font></div><div =
style=3D"font-size:12.8px;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><font face=3D"tahoma, sans-seri=
f">GAP600|=C2=A0<a href=3D"http://www.gap600.com/" target=3D"_blank">www.ga=
p600.com</a></font></div><div style=3D"font-size:12.8px;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><=
font face=3D"tahoma, sans-serif">Phone:=C2=A0</font><span style=3D"font-fam=
ily:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">+44 113 4900 117</span></div><div s=
tyle=3D"font-size:12.8px;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><font face=3D"tahoma, sans-serif=
">Skype: daniellipshitz123</font></div><div style=3D"font-size:12.8px;color=
:rgb(0,0,0)"><font face=3D"tahoma, sans-serif">Twitter: @daniellipshitz</fo=
nt></div></div></div></div></div></div><br></div></div><br><div class=3D"gm=
ail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 12:=
04 AM Erik Aronesty <<a href=3D"mailto:erik@q32.com">erik@q32.com</a>>=
; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px=
0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div di=
r=3D"ltr">There has never been any enforcement of miner preferences.=C2=A0 =
=C2=A0The convention is changing quickly, since miners are squeezed for cas=
h and want to capture=C2=A0every nickel, plus there are bounties for full r=
bf being posted every day.<div><br></div><div>I would suggest considering t=
o continue doing business, as usual, as if full rbf is present.</div><div><=
br></div><div>This means:<br><br>- managing risk</div><div>- waiting for co=
nfirmations if the risk is too high</div><div>- using lightning if possible=
</div><div><br></div><div>No other coin or chain offers=C2=A0a safer way to=
do business than lightning over bitcoin.</div><div><br></div><div><div><br=
></div><div><br></div></div></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=
=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 7:32 AM Daniel Lipshit=
z via bitcoin-dev <<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.o=
rg" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<=
br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8e=
x;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"=
>HI All<div><br></div><div>I am the CEO of GAP600. We guarantee zero confir=
med Bitcoin and other crypto=C2=A0 transactions, BTC is a primary part of o=
ur business. Our guarantee enables our customers to recognise zero-conf dep=
osits. We reimburse our clients value of the trx should we get it wrong and=
a transaction we confirmed gets double spent.</div><div><br></div><div>Sho=
uld full RBF become default enabled and significantly adopted this would ha=
ve a major impact on the capacity to accept zerof confs on mainnet. With th=
e end result being this use case will be forced to move to a different chai=
n, with lightning being just another=C2=A0option.</div><div><br></div><div>=
I wanted to share some statistics about how significant this use case is.=
=C2=A0</div><div>GAP600 clients are primarily payment processors and non cu=
stodial liquidity=C2=A0providers; you can see some of our clients on our si=
te <a href=3D"http://www.gap600.com" target=3D"_blank">www.gap600.com</a>. =
There are also merchants who have developed their own tools so GAP600 stati=
stics are only a subset of the full use case.=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><di=
v>I do not know of any wallet, exchange or custodian who accepts zero conf =
without having some sort of solution=C2=A0in place. The market seems to be =
fully aware of the risks of zero-conf. The opt-RBF seems to be a solution w=
hich gives a clear free choice for actors.</div><div><br></div><div>Statist=
ics for consideration as a sample of the zero conf use case -=C2=A0</div><d=
iv><br></div><div><ol><li>As of end of Nov 2022 - GAP600 has processed i.e =
responded to circa 15M transactions</li><li>These transactions have a cumul=
ative value of 2.3B USD value.=C2=A0</li><li>We currently are seeing circa =
1.5M transactions queired per month.=C2=A0</li></ol></div><div><br></div><d=
iv>It's a sizable amount of trxs on mainet and we are by no means the f=
ull market of platforms accepting zero-conf.=C2=A0=C2=A0I realise there are=
other considerations which BTC has,=C2=A0 I would urge you to take into ac=
count the major risk being placed on this significant market share when dec=
iding to make this feature default enabled and encouraging=C2=A0full adopti=
on.</div><div><br></div><div>Thank you for your consideration</div><div>Dan=
iel</div><div><div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div style=
=3D"font-size:12.8px">________________________________</div><div style=3D"f=
ont-size:12.8px"><br></div><div style=3D"font-size:12.8px"><font face=3D"ta=
homa, sans-serif">Daniel Lipshitz</font></div><div style=3D"font-size:12.8p=
x;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><font face=3D"tahoma, sans-serif">GAP600|=C2=A0<a href=
=3D"http://www.gap600.com/" target=3D"_blank">www.gap600.com</a></font></di=
v><div style=3D"font-size:12.8px;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><br></div></div></div></=
div></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">=
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>
--000000000000fda77105eed2861c--
|