1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
|
Return-Path: <patrick.strateman@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75065EA6
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 7 Feb 2016 19:02:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pf0-f181.google.com (mail-pf0-f181.google.com
[209.85.192.181])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23745E1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 7 Feb 2016 19:02:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pf0-f181.google.com with SMTP id e127so2485192pfe.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 07 Feb 2016 11:02:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:disposition-notification-to
:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=Bv/qT9YXccbhxdwY17oTRndNxlN0hlD1yHs3PzeRpcA=;
b=t73pRnsDm7VyryLE8GILLwTF41DOdbJkVlKv2rc1FgCV6e6lxAtp6hVOz11jHTpfqS
CBmqF9gmcwhQsYWZvOo2d4n62dcfZiaWLIPuYM3mQh0XELsNoKJGVIrTmT1fwehn8clJ
RX0y7oa5woYpCsFjG+uXFSqVoTdeG+zjI4KONU6lxROHAm/tkXXYZA6ks46EZIlU+e44
R0jQccqs9GLwhb1SjsP6S/BXDfXNhqFnwHEX1CR+gBa1424+jnZmtkLhPsOzrp4S6OhX
MRsdOk/U5/B2OFlw/JJlK5VDDgeIMx4dI5qvjbCbXfr1DZhSfDreAImjpQKGfOxmRPuX
9GLw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id
:disposition-notification-to:date:user-agent:mime-version
:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=Bv/qT9YXccbhxdwY17oTRndNxlN0hlD1yHs3PzeRpcA=;
b=YhOtDw2mjQa8rIwebAvAKwZhj+CsjdA5J3V/QSgBPwSeZdub08EnTpoiUarptvQx7e
uH0Wb4i8ysVZshB4ixxr+7yShYGNdx0Jp/kV6RBR245YyvXtFKcU4Lk53RAWpRR6MT5W
RLL996cx9jLIj/8vfcl+2B1s5DB6mgGnpWkNIT7TXDu2nURN/jKxIVuFQic3yLYA4fcP
D+bj8/wsqBnfxK082D8Uc5mncGyyAvSJ9lNNVNzLsK5dzDUxzO/Phzys16371WSz5wSA
03EvCmnbM/jOk8U92pt42wGr412B6BlwFGrb8c1RzTGAjrNrjIde1K+JDNxQruf01ckj
MDow==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSjE1/Y9vDowzjzvexKSSbYgA9rpsGUwXSlUCli4FStzwdWGa5Z3Q9PDC9F0jBBAg==
X-Received: by 10.98.10.149 with SMTP id 21mr36633797pfk.75.1454871755867;
Sun, 07 Feb 2016 11:02:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.45.134.131] (strateman.ninja. [66.175.221.254])
by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
z67sm37954138pfa.71.2016.02.07.11.02.34
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Sun, 07 Feb 2016 11:02:35 -0800 (PST)
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <CABsx9T1Bd0-aQg-9uRa4u3dGA5fKxaj8-mEkxVzX8mhdj4Gt2g@mail.gmail.com>
<201602060012.26728.luke@dashjr.org>
<CABm2gDrns0+eZdLyNk=tDNbnMsC1tT1MfEY93cJf1V_8TPjmLA@mail.gmail.com>
<CABsx9T2LuMZciXpMiY24+rPzhj1VT6j=HJ5STtnQmnfnA_XFUw@mail.gmail.com>
<CABeL=0i8_Ns25=OaXG86uSsQKzPA2YbTU_zRj6k6K48aYhw3wA@mail.gmail.com>
<7E723AB3-ED80-40CE-B5BD-DD5F69486C16@toom.im>
From: Patrick Strateman <patrick.strateman@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <56B7951A.2090800@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 11:03:54 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
Icedove/38.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7E723AB3-ED80-40CE-B5BD-DD5F69486C16@toom.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 19:11:16 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Increase block size limit to 2
megabytes
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 19:02:36 -0000
I would expect that custodians who fail to produce coins on both sides
of a fork in response to depositor requests will find themselves in
serious legal trouble.
Especially if the price moves against either fork.
On 02/07/2016 10:55 AM, Jonathan Toomim via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>
> On Feb 6, 2016, at 9:21 PM, Jannes Faber via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
>
>> They *must* be able to send their customers both coins as separate
>> withdrawals.
>>
> Supporting the obsolete chain is unnecessary. Such support has not
> been offered in any cryptocurrency hard fork before, as far as I know.
> I do not see why it should start now.
>>
>> If not, that amounts to theft of their customers funds.
>>
> If they announce their planned behavior before the fork, I do not see
> any ethical or legal issues.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
|
