summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/69/cdcc7ff922f6d4e8ab6f6d41f0f6d872ff5e13
blob: 1ba090903e6608ad337f449b126bd610909d4dca (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
Return-Path: <tomz@freedommail.ch>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 388BFA7B
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 12 Jul 2017 09:02:58 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mx.kolabnow.com (mx.kolabnow.com [95.128.36.41])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21C51F3
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 12 Jul 2017 09:02:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by ext-mx-out003.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0EBAB19
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:02:55 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kolabnow.com; h=
	content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version
	:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:date:subject:subject
	:from:from:received:received:received; s=dkim20160331; t=
	1499850173; x=1499850195; bh=cE8CO0IN4ElXZfdCWWySreCycjfPxDMaArc
	ZrHuIG3Y=; b=e73t6r1ppOwVV4zNk/Xz/lHcdqvP0DKBJIK34CCq623bl4bZU5O
	Jo/68Y/QDT7uiEneN+4le1/fYhBmd3E4mG/tb8pr6Qihths6w/wCv9Ejc8ynxG/8
	ieXAdc/bqoCc+Z7sCUaYrcB9v9mpIo+5/U9+EB3EiZLD7epCVShyEp76RVpDl9a8
	8kMI268bvQWSol88HGuFULZWXzRi+OM4Cb25BHAhTtVMXxCuZlKlLYVVuETSex0y
	4GzcurBIDqbAXonmvM09JUFZLi2ZNyuv1NJVO8qDlhy8DXLA7ovKxtU7s5swcjGS
	sJq8pEhkHkUMRpMEyzUBKeHBt6ST9st2b+BOIlzJetNzoaztucu3GBr6MI20waYx
	wxbq95Uy1bBdU7UfWPCCVk6RBnxKm9AOFEjFA3X0rrYz/7EbeyKB88/QvePlJEKI
	/vbRbUXQZ+8hPHTfpBEc+E7nmpvv1HGd09sfEhEBVdyCidZ0+nX4mecevqJKn8/6
	Z36LFzz0vAwP/MLfKlGjUUzNAxMmFYakmLY+VcpuqOyB1dpC4XDsveHcpdtzu3BW
	zzZqwkft+SmvTBIi2QrAbo8OxnRo/8HXE7hlVNBlHmWcwbIQzRkWQZO1UhToOCM1
	adYiQ34YvghGnA2i5A4v0nPYlie8BkFi6eBw0npeWmZaR6D8BPLXoM5g=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mykolab.com
Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (ext-mx-out003.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id QwgHld-CKPmh
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:02:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from int-mx003.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.3])
	by ext-mx-out003.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAA56397
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:02:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ext-subm002.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.6.2])
	by int-mx003.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC18529DD
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:02:53 +0200 (CEST)
From: Tom Zander <tomz@freedommail.ch>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:02:51 +0200
Message-ID: <6345529.fq5kzMBjkQ@strawberry>
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgRDVgdMYZo776iLwbm23aGNDWL85YgD=yF=M-0_vqJ5nQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <0119661e-a11a-6d4b-c9ec-fd510bd4f144@gmail.com>
	<CAAS2fgRDVgdMYZo776iLwbm23aGNDWL85YgD=yF=M-0_vqJ5nQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 12:28:15 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Updating the Scaling Roadmap
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 09:02:58 -0000

On Tuesday, 11 July 2017 23:11:38 CEST Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev=20
wrote:
> I think it's great that people want to experiment with things like
> drivechains/sidechains and what not, but their security model is very
> distinct from Bitcoin's and, given the current highly centralized
> mining ecosystem, arguably not very good.  So positioning them as a
> major solution for the Bitcoin project is the wrong way to go. Instead
> we should support people trying cool stuff, at their own risk.
>
> So, given that although the vast majority of the things in the document
> are things I've been supporting for months (Please see Note 1 way down
> at the bottom) I cannot support your document.

I=E2=80=9Dm thinking along the same lines, a industry wide roadmap makes ve=
ry little=20
sense.

Much like in Linux we have a lot of smaller groups doing their own thing,=20
all working for the good of Linux as they see it, and implicitly, as they=20
use it.
I think its safe to say that Linus would not want any say over the roadmap=
=20
of Intel or Google or any other particpant in the Linux space.

I am in agreement with Gregory that we should reject a Bitcoin-wide scaling=
=20
roadmap.

I do suggest that smalle groups publish their individual roadmaps, show wha=
t=20
they are planning to work on in a place that people will find it (a website=
,=20
not a mailinglist archive).

Those individual roadmaps then show what that group will work on, which=20
helps their communication. It helps people talking about Bitcoin to the=20
general public as well, and it helps people understand whom they would like=
=20
to support financially or otherwise.
=2D-=20
Tom Zander
Blog: https://zander.github.io
Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel