1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
|
Return-Path: <tier.nolan@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 788E09EE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 6 Sep 2017 22:20:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-oi0-f49.google.com (mail-oi0-f49.google.com
[209.85.218.49])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28F68433
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 6 Sep 2017 22:20:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oi0-f49.google.com with SMTP id n18so49478606oig.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 06 Sep 2017 15:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=3p4OcAVi33bqXGdUppDeTv0YQxZSSpTnzjkEPi5TNBc=;
b=qf61MxR++xBsc92oPXGn+hUjybmGIm644GLMJFHmqVx2gIhUvEpxbpv7KYlBTRV+Ya
loR+6fwG6uUu/DnVtt1IO0WrTaPPePdxQG2U8cGGFCQs4C3YPA6h5DO92SwPe/1/b7Ax
M0poeDoMVUByJoY+exu0n9e75fyYz4pwJhGMM6dwx4aRiX99qFnjSFsR7F54YZ1ksH1/
LsSEK9z8OD68r9AFoxTQp28dblpHbMt5RhEzAR5Cj0WhjUfIQdSn2IkZ5OxBEzfbjIv6
dL4Q0lTOfcDpUQ/JCf3EH3M67nipdgIqwY7opVWw5telXuz+yIgDPS0w9ZhsHNr2b3xc
64sQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=3p4OcAVi33bqXGdUppDeTv0YQxZSSpTnzjkEPi5TNBc=;
b=YORYgxii/lsc1aZSK0VzDXWi435LfPZ8e3oOehpCiVnCHTUa8gYrlRqc27mSIOJZb7
EhgahyriylrJUrzYhaDjNvsZgGT18UoqhZ9J27uPZ6JbNx6EyeXE2FDQv1Mk9LXFM3pj
8wtsowGp0f1sQA5BnvcPCz/mTfidJi6aa6GtyDFXIFPl0r/QotTxiWMGydNf0XO4q0dA
ryHXrz5WIiEWHHC0d0UW3ik7sou3VQ6Gj+WEtjWi2HTc2LQv3N5NNEjoGQNElaXTWOZ0
eQFNUOnKPyTBJXhobp26bkk9AHAJl2mU//DIq8NHI7tM0ICll4mnT1dwwwcCNZ69qyCF
TFAg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjfx8/c3eA1ze1qb87/lBCvA3xZsJTuHlvpx0d/peO7usWowm7i
AACu+5G5/f2pyZl5Z5lfs5de0lbX8A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb7Kob0LjBthFgWpDGeAMK/tB1H1lAXbZVyFTlQ10KFX2ploWNdjZfenLhWWpV5og8X76U/OJOmX2lELgmmdTV0=
X-Received: by 10.202.208.135 with SMTP id j7mr734467oiy.146.1504736443297;
Wed, 06 Sep 2017 15:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.74.93.71 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 15:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDojDQWMhw8wW1UkRGKtdbby2+6AFFZLPuRcUb7WF_u5qQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABm2gDojDQWMhw8wW1UkRGKtdbby2+6AFFZLPuRcUb7WF_u5qQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tier Nolan <tier.nolan@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 23:20:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CAE-z3OWQZK1z7WFOSQOu15ri2cOGx9vCzyd1P=Q1t6MPDBOcLw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1146c0c62ef5a605588cc199"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] SF proposal: prohibit unspendable outputs with
amount=0
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 22:20:44 -0000
--001a1146c0c62ef5a605588cc199
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Is there any reason or use case to keep allowing spendable outputs
> with null amounts in them?
>
Someone could have created a timelocked transaction that depends on a zero
value output.
This could be protected by requiring a tx version number change. Only zero
outputs in the new version would be affected.
I am not sure how strictly people are sticking to that rule though.
--001a1146c0c62ef5a605588cc199
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On T=
ue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"=
ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D=
"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><bl=
ockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #=
ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Is there any reason or use case to keep allowing spendable outputs<br>
with null amounts in them?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Someone coul=
d have created a timelocked transaction that depends on a zero value output=
.</div><div><br></div><div>This could be protected by requiring a tx versio=
n number change.=C2=A0 Only zero outputs in the new version would be affect=
ed.</div><div><br></div><div>I am not sure how strictly people are sticking=
to that rule though.<br></div></div></div></div>
--001a1146c0c62ef5a605588cc199--
|
